What happened with the DCE coaches that were assistants at Bullis? Was there a connection to Bellestri's termination? Did the school decide that the DCE connection was so important that it had to move this way? I understand that DCE has a lot of money tied up in the renovation of the Bullis fields and that it is a long term relationship.
[Report Post]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s coming from the DCE guys in particular a father who happens to be on the board.
On the Bullis board or on the DCE board?
DCE doesn't have a Board. Bet its a dad whose son isnt that good and is mad his kid isnt playing. Typical entitled DC type who uses his money to buy his way.
+1
Don’t be a fool, they are not making a change because of a kid not getting playing time...Bullis historically plays the best kids regardless of age or how long they have been in the program...and it has been successful. This move is about long term direction of the program. Whether this proves a good move or a bad one is open to debate. Time will tell.
Not trolling but successful in what way? Bullis et al have been very successful in winning games on the field but at the cost of putting full tuition students on the bench. The 1 or 2 year transfers play and win and then those families disappear from the school, meaning no future donations. The kids on the bench grow up being bitter and they don't give either.
IMO, the strategy has showed increased downside as tuitions have risen dramatically to support the athletic transfers. But maybe it's all been for the good since the facilities at the schools are fantastic. Bullis has the STEM center and incredible fields and the other privates have all done fantastic renovations.
Let's see if Bullis doubles down by hiring an even more aggressive coach or if they go in a different direction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s coming from the DCE guys in particular a father who happens to be on the board.
On the Bullis board or on the DCE board?
DCE doesn't have a Board. Bet its a dad whose son isnt that good and is mad his kid isnt playing. Typical entitled DC type who uses his money to buy his way.
+1
Don’t be a fool, they are not making a change because of a kid not getting playing time...Bullis historically plays the best kids regardless of age or how long they have been in the program...and it has been successful. This move is about long term direction of the program. Whether this proves a good move or a bad one is open to debate. Time will tell.
This move is about long term direction of the program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s coming from the DCE guys in particular a father who happens to be on the board.
On the Bullis board or on the DCE board?
DCE doesn't have a Board. Bet its a dad whose son isnt that good and is mad his kid isnt playing. Typical entitled DC type who uses his money to buy his way.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't necessarily need to be a '21. Could be another year of DCE.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s coming from the DCE guys in particular a father who happens to be on the board.
On the Bullis board or on the DCE board?
DCE doesn't have a Board. Bet its a dad whose son isnt that good and is mad his kid isnt playing. Typical entitled DC type who uses his money to buy his way.
+1