Anonymous wrote:14:10 is a liar.

Yep. It’s what they do. They know that most people on this site won’t check their info.

Anonymous wrote:14:10 is a liar.

DP. That's what the LAPD said, toots.

I guess you know better from your mother's basement.

14:15, the world will believe what we all saw with our own eyes, not your lies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess they could have waited until things devolved like they did during the Sum-mer of Love when rioters took over the police precinct because the inept governor there - what was his name? - waited too long to activate the National Guard. Yeah we could have just waited until these rioters took over the detention facility in LA, released all the violent criminal aliens, then burned the place to the ground. Because that is what they want.

The last time something like this happened with the national guard, it was 1965 when the feds brought them in to protect African American students from a racist southern governor. Do you really think what is happening in Los Angeles right now comes close to rising to that special circumstance and occasion?

Bringing in National Guard to enforce federal law because local Democrats were resisting.

No they weren't. The police were on site and the area was cleared before the national guard showed up.

Then who was throwing the rocks? LAPD?

No one was throwing rocks at the LAPD until they showed up with horses and started beating on people.

Why isn't Trump's clear and open call for federal law enforcement to arrest a Democratic governor based on zero lawbreaking of any kind leading every single news site right now?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess they could have waited until things devolved like they did during the Sum-mer of Love when rioters took over the police precinct because the inept governor there - what was his name? - waited too long to activate the National Guard. Yeah we could have just waited until these rioters took over the detention facility in LA, released all the violent criminal aliens, then burned the place to the ground. Because that is what they want.

The last time something like this happened with the national guard, it was 1965 when the feds brought them in to protect African American students from a racist southern governor. Do you really think what is happening in Los Angeles right now comes close to rising to that special circumstance and occasion?

Bringing in National Guard to enforce federal law because local Democrats were resisting.

No they weren't. The police were on site and the area was cleared before the national guard showed up.

Then who was throwing the rocks? LAPD?

Musk gets his talking points from his father.

Anonymous wrote:14:10 is a liar.

I will believe my own eyes over propaganda platforms. And the facts matter. The events of Saturday were over and cleared out and no national guard was on site at that point. So no, not a liar.


Also, you all understand, this all took place at a Home Depot that takes up a portion of a city block. there was no other negative activity anywhere else. All of the fires and whatever else were in the area in front of the Home Depot - a portion of a block on a street in a city of millions of people. But this is trump's Reichtag, so y'all gonna believe what you want.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Libs want the baby rapists to stay here!!!

Are you sure you want to bring this up? Elon had some thoughts about that

14:10 is a liar.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess they could have waited until things devolved like they did during the Sum-mer of Love when rioters took over the police precinct because the inept governor there - what was his name? - waited too long to activate the National Guard. Yeah we could have just waited until these rioters took over the detention facility in LA, released all the violent criminal aliens, then burned the place to the ground. Because that is what they want.

The last time something like this happened with the national guard, it was 1965 when the feds brought them in to protect African American students from a racist southern governor. Do you really think what is happening in Los Angeles right now comes close to rising to that special circumstance and occasion?

Bringing in National Guard to enforce federal law because local Democrats were resisting.

No they weren't. The police were on site and the area was cleared before the national guard showed up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People waving Mexican flags to not de deported to Mexico lol spin for the spin doctors!

Showing once again that Democrats are bad at messaging. These images would have power if they had featured American flags instead of Mexican, but instead it's like 'f 'em'.

This is what loses the argument and the sympathy of most Americans. If their country is so great, why are they fighting to stay in America? Is it because they want to take over America? Those images tell the story of our police and National Guard fighting to capture foreign invaders.

Whatever, just make some noise, throws some rocks, act like feral animals!

OMFG - the democrats in 2025 are both insane and dangerous!

Now democrats in other cities are rioting too.

Why do Democrats want war?
Barack and Joe failed to completely destroy our country?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess they could have waited until things devolved like they did during the Sum-mer of Love when rioters took over the police precinct because the inept governor there - what was his name? - waited too long to activate the National Guard. Yeah we could have just waited until these rioters took over the detention facility in LA, released all the violent criminal aliens, then burned the place to the ground. Because that is what they want.

The last time something like this happened with the national guard, it was 1965 when the feds brought them in to protect African American students from a racist southern governor. Do you really think what is happening in Los Angeles right now comes close to rising to that special circumstance and occasion?

Bringing in National Guard to enforce federal law because local Democrats were resisting.

Anonymous wrote:Federal law enforcement was unable to enforce the law due to violence, so Trump called in the National Guard.

That's not what the LAPD said.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess they could have waited until things devolved like they did during the Sum-mer of Love when rioters took over the police precinct because the inept governor there - what was his name? - waited too long to activate the National Guard. Yeah we could have just waited until these rioters took over the detention facility in LA, released all the violent criminal aliens, then burned the place to the ground. Because that is what they want.

The last time something like this happened with the national guard, it was 1965 when the feds brought them in to protect African American students from a racist southern governor. Do you really think what is happening in Los Angeles right now comes close to rising to that special circumstance and occasion?

Bringing in National Guard to enforce federal law because local Democrats were resisting.