Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is Visi still down a bunch to injuries?
their top players were on the field. Cubs couldn’t generate many shots.
That makes more sense. No way GC is that much better than Visi.
Ummm, that makes no sense. Visi was unable to generate any shots because GC defense was fire. And Visi couldn’t stop their offense. So yes, GC was that much better.
They were missing 3 players, what does not make sense?
Which players were they missing? ND and VT seniors were back. They were really the only offense they had.
And GC is that much better than Visi. Their defense held Visi in check all game and if not for the goalies the game would have been an even wider margin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Visi play same goalie whole game? Bucknell commit?
Switched at half. Senior player first half and junior player second. Both are Bucknell commits.
Anonymous wrote:Did Visi play same goalie whole game? Bucknell commit?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is Visi still down a bunch to injuries?
their top players were on the field. Cubs couldn’t generate many shots.
That makes more sense. No way GC is that much better than Visi.
Ummm, that makes no sense. Visi was unable to generate any shots because GC defense was fire. And Visi couldn’t stop their offense. So yes, GC was that much better.
They were missing 3 players, what does not make sense?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is Visi still down a bunch to injuries?
their top players were on the field. Cubs couldn’t generate many shots.
That makes more sense. No way GC is that much better than Visi.
Ummm, that makes no sense. Visi was unable to generate any shots because GC defense was fire. And Visi couldn’t stop their offense. So yes, GC was that much better.
They were missing 3 players, what does not make sense?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is Visi still down a bunch to injuries?
their top players were on the field. Cubs couldn’t generate many shots.
That makes more sense. No way GC is that much better than Visi.
Ummm, that makes no sense. Visi was unable to generate any shots because GC defense was fire. And Visi couldn’t stop their offense. So yes, GC was that much better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Saints has like 20 college commits and KJ has been coaching the 26 class since they were in Stars. Prohibitive favorites. All other ISL and WCAC teams are just trying to keep up.
No one in the WCAC nor the ISL has beaten GC since Visi beat them in 2023 and until they do GC stays on top and everyone else including KJ and her 20 D1 commits are just chasing....
GC has terrible college recruiting history. I don’t think the school produces players who have the academics to play at top D1 schools or Ivy’s. Great lax players but but you have to be the full package
Girls are recruited from club, not HS teams. And I know it might be shocking, but not everyone wants to attend an Ivy.
Always chuckle when posters say the decision to go ivy is up to them …
it actually is. No school is guaranteed to get the players they recruit. MANY have past on that tuition.
Why would anyone pass on the small most liberal schools in America?
Trump, Vance, Cruz, Hawley, Desantis, Cotton to name a few thought going to most elite schools in the world was a good idea. I guess they were able to handle it without wilting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Saints has like 20 college commits and KJ has been coaching the 26 class since they were in Stars. Prohibitive favorites. All other ISL and WCAC teams are just trying to keep up.
No one in the WCAC nor the ISL has beaten GC since Visi beat them in 2023 and until they do GC stays on top and everyone else including KJ and her 20 D1 commits are just chasing....
GC has terrible college recruiting history. I don’t think the school produces players who have the academics to play at top D1 schools or Ivy’s. Great lax players but but you have to be the full package
Girls are recruited from club, not HS teams. And I know it might be shocking, but not everyone wants to attend an Ivy.
Always chuckle when posters say the decision to go ivy is up to them …
it actually is. No school is guaranteed to get the players they recruit. MANY have past on that tuition.
Why would anyone pass on the small most liberal schools in America?
The ones who couldn’t get in anyway and hate making six figures after graduation (probably).
Six figures? please tell me you don't think that you need an Ivy Lesgue degree to earn six figures.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GC just better. Dominated the draw until late when they started putting more subs in. Visi couldn't crack the GC defense.
With this result and SR taking the big loss at Penn Charter (5 goals larger spread than Potomac), looks like it’s GC and SSSAS as the clear top two in the DC area.
Early season mixed rankings (WCAC/ISL):
1. GC
2. SSSAS
Big gap
3. SR
4. Visi
5. SJC
6. Potomac
Gap
7. HC
8. PVI
SR belongs with GC and Saints. And not a SR parent
Why wouldn’t Potomac be ranked higher than SR, even just based on the Penn Charter games?
Penn charter beat St Paul 10-4. By the same logic Potomac would rank higher than SPSG… (obviously not)
Keep in mind Penn Charter played a double header on the day they played Potomac so they probably pulled their starters early to be ready for the next game.
GC and SSSAS are in a league of their own. SSSAS is the team to beat in ISL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is Visi still down a bunch to injuries?
their top players were on the field. Cubs couldn’t generate many shots.
That makes more sense. No way GC is that much better than Visi.
Ummm, that makes no sense. Visi was unable to generate any shots because GC defense was fire. And Visi couldn’t stop their offense. So yes, GC was that much better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GC just better. Dominated the draw until late when they started putting more subs in. Visi couldn't crack the GC defense.
With this result and SR taking the big loss at Penn Charter (5 goals larger spread than Potomac), looks like it’s GC and SSSAS as the clear top two in the DC area.
Early season mixed rankings (WCAC/ISL):
1. GC
2. SSSAS
Big gap
3. SR
4. Visi
5. SJC
6. Potomac
Gap
7. HC
8. PVI
SR belongs with GC and Saints. And not a SR parent
Why wouldn’t Potomac be ranked higher than SR, even just based on the Penn Charter games?
Penn charter beat St Paul 10-4. By the same logic Potomac would rank higher than SPSG… (obviously not)
Keep in mind Penn Charter played a double header on the day they played Potomac so they probably pulled their starters early to be ready for the next game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is Visi still down a bunch to injuries?
their top players were on the field. Cubs couldn’t generate many shots.
That makes more sense. No way GC is that much better than Visi.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GC just better. Dominated the draw until late when they started putting more subs in. Visi couldn't crack the GC defense.
With this result and SR taking the big loss at Penn Charter (5 goals larger spread than Potomac), looks like it’s GC and SSSAS as the clear top two in the DC area.
Early season mixed rankings (WCAC/ISL):
1. GC
2. SSSAS
Big gap
3. SR
4. Visi
5. SJC
6. Potomac
Gap
7. HC
8. PVI
SR belongs with GC and Saints. And not a SR parent
Why wouldn’t Potomac be ranked higher than SR, even just based on the Penn Charter games?