Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This book was an easy yet painful read. Basically his and Megan's truth trumps anyone else's. 🥴....odd stance to take
Do you read many memoirs? They are told from the author's perspective. This isn't new. That's not to say there aren't other perspective or opinions out there, but that also doesn't mean the author's truth trumps anyone's else. You don't seem to understand the genre.
This.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This book was an easy yet painful read. Basically his and Megan's truth trumps anyone else's. 🥴....odd stance to take
Do you read many memoirs? They are told from the author's perspective. This isn't new. That's not to say there aren't other perspective or opinions out there, but that also doesn't mean the author's truth trumps anyone's else. You don't seem to understand the genre.
Anonymous wrote:This book was an easy yet painful read. Basically his and Megan's truth trumps anyone else's. 🥴....odd stance to take
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's condescending AF to tell someone you aren't that close with, who is as much a co-worker as anything else, that they have "baby brain". It's not some cutesy American thing women all say to each other. Especially from someone who doesn't even have kids. A friend might say it to another friend, who are both mothers, when one can't decide what to eat for dinner or some other trivial thing. Otherwise, it's rude and inappropriate.
It is reasonable to assume that your relationship with your soon-to-be SIL is on a different level than a coworker. Yet, even with co-workers, it wouldn't be unreasonable, condescending or rude to excuse a lapse by attributing it to baby-brain. Presumabley, there is some friendliness and goodwill between coworkers. What the incident highlighted is how very wrong that assumption was for the family Meghan was joining.
They weren't friends, that was well established earlier. Go on and try saying that BS to someone at work, see what happens. You're aren't going to get high five when you say that to your boss.
DP. Maybe not friends but damn, they were more than co-workers. Unless of course you think they weren’t family and they are all just working a job together. Do you consider your in-laws your co-worker. Their children are cousins.
My siblings children and my children are cousins. What’s that supposed to mean? They’re not even as close as co-workers. Relationships shouldn’t be pushed on each other.
Not the right comparison. Are you close to your SIL?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imho moving away was the right move. It opened up lots of opportunities and they no longer have to abide by royal constraints while still able to use their royal status to their advantage. Wealthy and influential people in Hollywood tripped over each other to give them favors. I think there is some truth to some powers hoping for them to run for White House.
You believe in a lot of conspiracy theories also, don't you?
This one makes some sense.
That a foreign born prince can run for president? Ok.
His wife can, he'll make a great First Princely Gentleman with lots of global connections. Power duo.
It has to be Meghan. The only people of color who have risen to national office are not fully African Americans: Obama had a black African father and a white American mother; Harris has a black Jamaican father, and a brown Indian mother; Meghan has a white American father and a black American mother. With the Hispanic population tracking to be the majority in the US by the middle of the Century, there are only a few more chances for Meghan to be elected to the presidency. During the eight years following Biden, she will continue to position herself for national office. I suspect she will win a congressional seat in two years and then spring that into a run for the presidency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's condescending AF to tell someone you aren't that close with, who is as much a co-worker as anything else, that they have "baby brain". It's not some cutesy American thing women all say to each other. Especially from someone who doesn't even have kids. A friend might say it to another friend, who are both mothers, when one can't decide what to eat for dinner or some other trivial thing. Otherwise, it's rude and inappropriate.
It is reasonable to assume that your relationship with your soon-to-be SIL is on a different level than a coworker. Yet, even with co-workers, it wouldn't be unreasonable, condescending or rude to excuse a lapse by attributing it to baby-brain. Presumabley, there is some friendliness and goodwill between coworkers. What the incident highlighted is how very wrong that assumption was for the family Meghan was joining.
They weren't friends, that was well established earlier. Go on and try saying that BS to someone at work, see what happens. You're aren't going to get high five when you say that to your boss.
DP. Maybe not friends but damn, they were more than co-workers. Unless of course you think they weren’t family and they are all just working a job together. Do you consider your in-laws your co-worker. Their children are cousins.
My siblings children and my children are cousins. What’s that supposed to mean? They’re not even as close as co-workers. Relationships shouldn’t be pushed on each other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's condescending AF to tell someone you aren't that close with, who is as much a co-worker as anything else, that they have "baby brain". It's not some cutesy American thing women all say to each other. Especially from someone who doesn't even have kids. A friend might say it to another friend, who are both mothers, when one can't decide what to eat for dinner or some other trivial thing. Otherwise, it's rude and inappropriate.
It is reasonable to assume that your relationship with your soon-to-be SIL is on a different level than a coworker. Yet, even with co-workers, it wouldn't be unreasonable, condescending or rude to excuse a lapse by attributing it to baby-brain. Presumabley, there is some friendliness and goodwill between coworkers. What the incident highlighted is how very wrong that assumption was for the family Meghan was joining.
They weren't friends, that was well established earlier. Go on and try saying that BS to someone at work, see what happens. You're aren't going to get high five when you say that to your boss.
DP. Maybe not friends but damn, they were more than co-workers. Unless of course you think they weren’t family and they are all just working a job together. Do you consider your in-laws your co-worker. Their children are cousins.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's condescending AF to tell someone you aren't that close with, who is as much a co-worker as anything else, that they have "baby brain". It's not some cutesy American thing women all say to each other. Especially from someone who doesn't even have kids. A friend might say it to another friend, who are both mothers, when one can't decide what to eat for dinner or some other trivial thing. Otherwise, it's rude and inappropriate.
It is reasonable to assume that your relationship with your soon-to-be SIL is on a different level than a coworker. Yet, even with co-workers, it wouldn't be unreasonable, condescending or rude to excuse a lapse by attributing it to baby-brain. Presumabley, there is some friendliness and goodwill between coworkers. What the incident highlighted is how very wrong that assumption was for the family Meghan was joining.
They weren't friends, that was well established earlier. Go on and try saying that BS to someone at work, see what happens. You're aren't going to get high five when you say that to your boss.
Anonymous wrote:It's condescending AF to tell someone you aren't that close with, who is as much a co-worker as anything else, that they have "baby brain". It's not some cutesy American thing women all say to each other. Especially from someone who doesn't even have kids. A friend might say it to another friend, who are both mothers, when one can't decide what to eat for dinner or some other trivial thing. Otherwise, it's rude and inappropriate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all down to Will and actually Kate. Deep seated resentment towards Meghan and it got out of hand.
The biggest reveal is their dinner where Meghan was told she was inappropriate to Kate when she said " It's fine, it is baby brain."
"We aren't close enough to talk about my hormones. "
(What?)
She didn't know how to compete with Meghan in the shared limelight. William really has a thing where he is pretty petty when it comes to Harry. He has to be in charge.
Secondly, Meghan encouraged Harry to get therapy which is really too much for this group. They accused her of brainwashing him.
Dp. What Meghan said was wrong and rude to Kate.
Different strokes for different folks. I know I e told someone “don’t worry about it. You have baby mush brain right now. Don’t be so hard on yourself.” Frankly I don’t think I was being rude, but comforting. I was making an excuse for their behavior under strenuous circumstances. Dealing with a newborn is strenuous mentally and emotionally. And IMO, we as women act differently and our brains are full of fog during this period in our lives. Meghan was too American and too open, too familiar when Kate the Brit was having none of it.
It means every interaction with Kate had to be uncomfortable. As much as people say Meghan should have known what she was getting in to, she probably never expected Kate to attack her.
Every family has disputes like this and personalities that clash. I think the crux of the problem is that Harry and Meghan chose to expose this in public, knowing that it would blow up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all down to Will and actually Kate. Deep seated resentment towards Meghan and it got out of hand.
The biggest reveal is their dinner where Meghan was told she was inappropriate to Kate when she said " It's fine, it is baby brain."
"We aren't close enough to talk about my hormones. "
(What?)
She didn't know how to compete with Meghan in the shared limelight. William really has a thing where he is pretty petty when it comes to Harry. He has to be in charge.
Secondly, Meghan encouraged Harry to get therapy which is really too much for this group. They accused her of brainwashing him.
Dp. What Meghan said was wrong and rude to Kate.
Different strokes for different folks. I know I e told someone “don’t worry about it. You have baby mush brain right now. Don’t be so hard on yourself.” Frankly I don’t think I was being rude, but comforting. I was making an excuse for their behavior under strenuous circumstances. Dealing with a newborn is strenuous mentally and emotionally. And IMO, we as women act differently and our brains are full of fog during this period in our lives. Meghan was too American and too open, too familiar when Kate the Brit was having none of it.
It means every interaction with Kate had to be uncomfortable. As much as people say Meghan should have known what she was getting in to, she probably never expected Kate to attack her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all down to Will and actually Kate. Deep seated resentment towards Meghan and it got out of hand.
The biggest reveal is their dinner where Meghan was told she was inappropriate to Kate when she said " It's fine, it is baby brain."
"We aren't close enough to talk about my hormones. "
(What?)
She didn't know how to compete with Meghan in the shared limelight. William really has a thing where he is pretty petty when it comes to Harry. He has to be in charge.
Secondly, Meghan encouraged Harry to get therapy which is really too much for this group. They accused her of brainwashing him.
Dp. What Meghan said was wrong and rude to Kate.
DDP: I disagree. I don’t think it was a rude thing to say. I do think it’s the kind of comforting thing that many Americans would say to a friend. And Kate made it clear that she didn’t view them as friends.
They weren't friends. They had just met! I would be insulted by that sexist comment. Not very liberal for Meghan to say and untrue as well
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cutting off everyone doesn't mean you are shedding your emotional burden. You sure can shed your birth family, shed your friends, shed your in-laws, shed your ex partners, leave your home but you are never free. You'll probably make similar mistakes with new partners, children and friends. Running from people only works if you become monks.
You are speaking only for yourself. Cutting off toxic family, friends and partners works wonders for most people’s health, both mentally and physically.
Except it’s a “you problem.” When it’s your father, cousins, best friend (remember her bestie maid of honor - gone), and your spouse’s family.
Not to mention the ex-husbands, boyfriend she dumped after she returned from her trip to Botswana with Harry, and the numerous palace aids (including one tough cookie who worked for Hillary Clinton) that Meghan also dumped.
Who is this alleged bestie maid of honor? Where’s the evidence for all these claims?