Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She's an intimidating bad ass. Of all the words to use to describe her, joke is last on the list.
She is simply covering for the corruption in government. Everyone knows the dossier was horsecrap and the FISA warrants were gotten illegally.
Just like everyone knows Trump is a corrupt pos. And the Russians worked to get him into office.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She's an intimidating bad ass. Of all the words to use to describe her, joke is last on the list.
She is simply covering for the corruption in government. Everyone knows the dossier was horsecrap and the FISA warrants were gotten illegally.
Anonymous wrote:Why is Twitter valuable if it is controlled by Elon musk? Wouldn't users choose to use a different platform if Twitter got involved in trying to support Russia in the war?
Anonymous wrote:Why is Twitter valuable if it is controlled by Elon musk? Wouldn't users choose to use a different platform if Twitter got involved in trying to support Russia in the war?
Anonymous wrote:The US government is considering a national security review of Elon Musk's $44 billion Twitter acquisition, report says.
https://www.businessinsider.com/biden-elon-musk-twitter-deal-government-national-security-review-report-2022-10?utmSource=twitter&utmContent=referral&utmTerm=topbar&referrer=twitter
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So let's get this straight. Musk talks to Putin. Starlink goes down, and simultaeanously, Musk is spouting pro-Russian rhetoric.
All while having his hands out to get money to cover his stupid Twitter offer.
Sure, this all seems on the up and up.
The timing is awfully suspicious at the very least.
US Gov should take interest in Elon's businesses. He is shady as f***!