Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Churchill is two for two -
Monday: a fight between two students before home room. And yes, students took videos instead of getting an adult.
Tuesday: the COVID community letter came home with no specifics if the infected person was staff or a student. With no covered outdoor areas and rain forecasted for the next 3 days, containing the spread will be difficult.
What’s going to happen on Wednesday?
It's going to rain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For all of you going on aout needing SROs obviously don't understand
1. The fight was broken up and handled (didn't require a police officer)
2. Schools had security guards before SROs and still have them now
Like the post above stated SROs were put in as community approach to policing. They have now decided not to do that anymore. Now they will spend those funds elsewhere.
Fights will happen regardless of who is responding. If you think for one second having an SRO there would have prevented a fight you are an idiot.
Do you have a source for this? I want to believe you because I'd like to think that MCPS wasn't so stupid as to remove SRO without replacing them with anything.
A source? Ask any high school student or parent. Everyone has security guards and like i said they had them before SROs. Also just FYI middle schools and elementary schools have security as well. Not all day at one location like high schools but they have security officers responsible for each school. Look it up
I would love to look it up. Do you have a source?
Looking it up would mean finding a source yourself. Go to each schools website and see the staff directory. Go to the MCPS site and read about security.
Thanks. Do you have a link?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For all of you going on aout needing SROs obviously don't understand
1. The fight was broken up and handled (didn't require a police officer)
2. Schools had security guards before SROs and still have them now
Like the post above stated SROs were put in as community approach to policing. They have now decided not to do that anymore. Now they will spend those funds elsewhere.
Fights will happen regardless of who is responding. If you think for one second having an SRO there would have prevented a fight you are an idiot.
Do you have a source for this? I want to believe you because I'd like to think that MCPS wasn't so stupid as to remove SRO without replacing them with anything.
A source? Ask any high school student or parent. Everyone has security guards and like i said they had them before SROs. Also just FYI middle schools and elementary schools have security as well. Not all day at one location like high schools but they have security officers responsible for each school. Look it up
NP — my experience is HS and they all have security. Go to the staff directory at any MoCo HS website and look under the “security” section.
I would love to look it up. Do you have a source?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All the G schools are bad! Germantown! Gaithersburg! Glair! Gleinstin!
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Churchill is two for two -
Monday: a fight between two students before home room. And yes, students took videos instead of getting an adult.
Tuesday: the COVID community letter came home with no specifics if the infected person was staff or a student. With no covered outdoor areas and rain forecasted for the next 3 days, containing the spread will be difficult.
What’s going to happen on Wednesday?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since SROs are no longer in schools, then what is MCPS doing to keep schools safe?
Restorative justice practices and more emphasis on mental health support.
Which is great. And absolutely needs to happen.
I just wish they hadn’t removed the SROs too. MoCo is the only county that removed them in Maryland, even though several others examined the issue in the wake of George Floyd’s murder.
What exactly would an SRO done? Pulled a gun?
Presence is deterrence. Nobody ever has to touch a gun. There is far more to the spectrum of police work than an arrest/use of force.
So we agree we don’t need police with guns in the schools.
No. What is needed is a zero tolerance policy for violence in school. Years ago people were expelled for violence. Now they're given a cookie and told to write a note to themselves telling them why they're awesome.
There is a lot of truth to this.
I must admit I didn't feel this way until the Damascus broom incident. Some students are a danger to others and should be in a facility that can both educate them and ensure their behavior doesn't injure others. A high school with 1 or 2 thousand kids isn't the place for a student who is violent.
Broom incident? That makes it sound too benign. Just like the Rockvill HS case. Let’s call it what it was - Rape.
Except the latter was proven to be a false accusation
LMAO. Not quite. The victim was a minor.
I guess you would also appreciate how MCPS is saying that the Damascus case also shouldn’t count as rape.
Nobody was a victim.
Exactly! Except for those falsely accused and the Rockville High school community as whole.
What was the false accusation at Rockville?
The whole thing was made up and right wing nuts made Rockville their anti immigration poster child.
Wait, what?
Nothing ever happened? There were not two adult males having sex with a minor female in the bathroom? That didn’t happen?
Read the article
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For all of you going on aout needing SROs obviously don't understand
1. The fight was broken up and handled (didn't require a police officer)
2. Schools had security guards before SROs and still have them now
Like the post above stated SROs were put in as community approach to policing. They have now decided not to do that anymore. Now they will spend those funds elsewhere.
Fights will happen regardless of who is responding. If you think for one second having an SRO there would have prevented a fight you are an idiot.
Do you have a source for this? I want to believe you because I'd like to think that MCPS wasn't so stupid as to remove SRO without replacing them with anything.
A source? Ask any high school student or parent. Everyone has security guards and like i said they had them before SROs. Also just FYI middle schools and elementary schools have security as well. Not all day at one location like high schools but they have security officers responsible for each school. Look it up
I would love to look it up. Do you have a source?
Looking it up would mean finding a source yourself. Go to each schools website and see the staff directory. Go to the MCPS site and read about security.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For all of you going on aout needing SROs obviously don't understand
1. The fight was broken up and handled (didn't require a police officer)
2. Schools had security guards before SROs and still have them now
Like the post above stated SROs were put in as community approach to policing. They have now decided not to do that anymore. Now they will spend those funds elsewhere.
Fights will happen regardless of who is responding. If you think for one second having an SRO there would have prevented a fight you are an idiot.
Do you have a source for this? I want to believe you because I'd like to think that MCPS wasn't so stupid as to remove SRO without replacing them with anything.
A source? Ask any high school student or parent. Everyone has security guards and like i said they had them before SROs. Also just FYI middle schools and elementary schools have security as well. Not all day at one location like high schools but they have security officers responsible for each school. Look it up
I would love to look it up. Do you have a source?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since SROs are no longer in schools, then what is MCPS doing to keep schools safe?
Restorative justice practices and more emphasis on mental health support.
Which is great. And absolutely needs to happen.
I just wish they hadn’t removed the SROs too. MoCo is the only county that removed them in Maryland, even though several others examined the issue in the wake of George Floyd’s murder.
What exactly would an SRO done? Pulled a gun?
Presence is deterrence. Nobody ever has to touch a gun. There is far more to the spectrum of police work than an arrest/use of force.
So we agree we don’t need police with guns in the schools.
No. What is needed is a zero tolerance policy for violence in school. Years ago people were expelled for violence. Now they're given a cookie and told to write a note to themselves telling them why they're awesome.
There is a lot of truth to this.
I must admit I didn't feel this way until the Damascus broom incident. Some students are a danger to others and should be in a facility that can both educate them and ensure their behavior doesn't injure others. A high school with 1 or 2 thousand kids isn't the place for a student who is violent.
Broom incident? That makes it sound too benign. Just like the Rockvill HS case. Let’s call it what it was - Rape.
Except the latter was proven to be a false accusation
LMAO. Not quite. The victim was a minor.
I guess you would also appreciate how MCPS is saying that the Damascus case also shouldn’t count as rape.
Nobody was a victim.
Exactly! Except for those falsely accused and the Rockville High school community as whole.
What was the false accusation at Rockville?
The whole thing was made up and right wing nuts made Rockville their anti immigration poster child.
Wait, what?
Nothing ever happened? There were not two adult males having sex with a minor female in the bathroom? That didn’t happen?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Officer Amy at WCHS was a real asset to the community. If you were ever at the school you would have seen how she interacted with the kids and engaged with them. She wasn't some Robocop marching around the school. She was terrific and will be missed.
She should get a masters in social work and come back actually trained to help kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For all of you going on aout needing SROs obviously don't understand
1. The fight was broken up and handled (didn't require a police officer)
2. Schools had security guards before SROs and still have them now
Like the post above stated SROs were put in as community approach to policing. They have now decided not to do that anymore. Now they will spend those funds elsewhere.
Fights will happen regardless of who is responding. If you think for one second having an SRO there would have prevented a fight you are an idiot.
Do you have a source for this? I want to believe you because I'd like to think that MCPS wasn't so stupid as to remove SRO without replacing them with anything.
A source? Ask any high school student or parent. Everyone has security guards and like i said they had them before SROs. Also just FYI middle schools and elementary schools have security as well. Not all day at one location like high schools but they have security officers responsible for each school. Look it up
Anonymous wrote:Officer Amy at WCHS was a real asset to the community. If you were ever at the school you would have seen how she interacted with the kids and engaged with them. She wasn't some Robocop marching around the school. She was terrific and will be missed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since SROs are no longer in schools, then what is MCPS doing to keep schools safe?
Restorative justice practices and more emphasis on mental health support.
Which is great. And absolutely needs to happen.
I just wish they hadn’t removed the SROs too. MoCo is the only county that removed them in Maryland, even though several others examined the issue in the wake of George Floyd’s murder.
What exactly would an SRO done? Pulled a gun?
Presence is deterrence. Nobody ever has to touch a gun. There is far more to the spectrum of police work than an arrest/use of force.
So we agree we don’t need police with guns in the schools.
No. What is needed is a zero tolerance policy for violence in school. Years ago people were expelled for violence. Now they're given a cookie and told to write a note to themselves telling them why they're awesome.
There is a lot of truth to this.
I must admit I didn't feel this way until the Damascus broom incident. Some students are a danger to others and should be in a facility that can both educate them and ensure their behavior doesn't injure others. A high school with 1 or 2 thousand kids isn't the place for a student who is violent.
Broom incident? That makes it sound too benign. Just like the Rockvill HS case. Let’s call it what it was - Rape.
Except the latter was proven to be a false accusation
LMAO. Not quite. The victim was a minor.
I guess you would also appreciate how MCPS is saying that the Damascus case also shouldn’t count as rape.
Nobody was a victim.
Exactly! Except for those falsely accused and the Rockville High school community as whole.
What was the false accusation at Rockville?
The whole thing was made up and right wing nuts made Rockville their anti immigration poster child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since SROs are no longer in schools, then what is MCPS doing to keep schools safe?
Restorative justice practices and more emphasis on mental health support.
Which is great. And absolutely needs to happen.
I just wish they hadn’t removed the SROs too. MoCo is the only county that removed them in Maryland, even though several others examined the issue in the wake of George Floyd’s murder.
What exactly would an SRO done? Pulled a gun?
Presence is deterrence. Nobody ever has to touch a gun. There is far more to the spectrum of police work than an arrest/use of force.
So we agree we don’t need police with guns in the schools.
No. What is needed is a zero tolerance policy for violence in school. Years ago people were expelled for violence. Now they're given a cookie and told to write a note to themselves telling them why they're awesome.
There is a lot of truth to this.
I must admit I didn't feel this way until the Damascus broom incident. Some students are a danger to others and should be in a facility that can both educate them and ensure their behavior doesn't injure others. A high school with 1 or 2 thousand kids isn't the place for a student who is violent.
Broom incident? That makes it sound too benign. Just like the Rockvill HS case. Let’s call it what it was - Rape.
Except the latter was proven to be a false accusation
LMAO. Not quite. The victim was a minor.
I guess you would also appreciate how MCPS is saying that the Damascus case also shouldn’t count as rape.
Please don't spread false information. https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/crime/bs-md-rockville-rape-charges-20170505-story.html