Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think as more young women and girls are raised playing soccer around the world, the traditional dominance that the US women’s team enjoyed for so many years will end. It makes for great competition and more enjoyable games, though!
That is what everyone is missing. This was one game. Even though the team looked terrible, it's exciting to see another team play so well. Better soccer for women all over the world is better than the US smashing the competition every match.
The more competition, the more exciting the women’s soccer games will be. This leads to more audience, fans and revenue to fund bigger and better soccer clubs, leagues, etc. for youth to professional women’s soccer. I’m all for it.
Same here. Time for the USWNT dynasty to be challenged on the pitch. With the entry of Chelsea and Man City and other big-ticket clubs abroad into the women’s soccer world, my college player DD and her friends see Europe specifically England as a really desirable post-college destination if they’re lucky enough to continue to play.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think as more young women and girls are raised playing soccer around the world, the traditional dominance that the US women’s team enjoyed for so many years will end. It makes for great competition and more enjoyable games, though!
That is what everyone is missing. This was one game. Even though the team looked terrible, it's exciting to see another team play so well. Better soccer for women all over the world is better than the US smashing the competition every match.
The more competition, the more exciting the women’s soccer games will be. This leads to more audience, fans and revenue to fund bigger and better soccer clubs, leagues, etc. for youth to professional women’s soccer. I’m all for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to Paris for last World Cup and had thought this would happen then. A bunch of players on our team had trouble controlling the ball in tight spaces and they were missing passes with poor weighting. Hopefully it is corrected in the next game but there is no fear factor of the US team anymore.
Yeah, because you just correct bad technical play in 3 days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think as more young women and girls are raised playing soccer around the world, the traditional dominance that the US women’s team enjoyed for so many years will end. It makes for great competition and more enjoyable games, though!
That is what everyone is missing. This was one game. Even though the team looked terrible, it's exciting to see another team play so well. Better soccer for women all over the world is better than the US smashing the competition every match.
Anonymous wrote:No need for the snark. I meant I hope they get better result in next game but agree you can’t fix the technical issues in that tome
Anonymous wrote:I went to Paris for last World Cup and had thought this would happen then. A bunch of players on our team had trouble controlling the ball in tight spaces and they were missing passes with poor weighting. Hopefully it is corrected in the next game but there is no fear factor of the US team anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think as more young women and girls are raised playing soccer around the world, the traditional dominance that the US women’s team enjoyed for so many years will end. It makes for great competition and more enjoyable games, though!
That is what everyone is missing. This was one game. Even though the team looked terrible, it's exciting to see another team play so well. Better soccer for women all over the world is better than the US smashing the competition every match.
Watch the super league or the women’s champions league. That soccer blows away NWSL. They also paid more, have world class facilities and better coaches because those teams are part of a big European club.
The last sentence is the key point. They are part of a “big” European club. For soccer, the US doesn’t have big clubs to begin with much less one that will pay for women to play. Hence, the best women here should go play for the best clubs in Europe. There they will play against the best competition and learn how to play the best brand of soccer. In the meantime, the team will bounce back against NZ, but may lose to or tie Australia. This will trigger a roster rebuild with only Horan and Lavelle (and maybe Press and Dunn) remaining with the new, young crew.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think as more young women and girls are raised playing soccer around the world, the traditional dominance that the US women’s team enjoyed for so many years will end. It makes for great competition and more enjoyable games, though!
That is what everyone is missing. This was one game. Even though the team looked terrible, it's exciting to see another team play so well. Better soccer for women all over the world is better than the US smashing the competition every match.
Watch the super league or the women’s champions league. That soccer blows away NWSL. They also paid more, have world class facilities and better coaches because those teams are part of a big European club.
The last sentence is the key point. They are part of a “big” European club. For soccer, the US doesn’t have big clubs to begin with much less one that will pay for women to play. Hence, the best women here should go play for the best clubs in Europe. There they will play against the best competition and learn how to play the best brand of soccer. In the meantime, the team will bounce back against NZ, but may lose to or tie Australia. This will trigger a roster rebuild with only Horan and Lavelle (and maybe Press and Dunn) remaining with the new, young crew.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think as more young women and girls are raised playing soccer around the world, the traditional dominance that the US women’s team enjoyed for so many years will end. It makes for great competition and more enjoyable games, though!
That is what everyone is missing. This was one game. Even though the team looked terrible, it's exciting to see another team play so well. Better soccer for women all over the world is better than the US smashing the competition every match.
Watch the super league or the women’s champions league. That soccer blows away NWSL. They also paid more, have world class facilities and better coaches because those teams are part of a big European club.
The last sentence is the key point. They are part of a “big” European club. For soccer, the US doesn’t have big clubs to begin with much less one that will pay for women to play. Hence, the best women here should go play for the best clubs in Europe. There they will play against the best competition and learn how to play the best brand of soccer. In the meantime, the team will bounce back against NZ, but may lose to or tie Australia. This will trigger a roster rebuild with only Horan and Lavelle (and maybe Press and Dunn) remaining with the new, young crew.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think as more young women and girls are raised playing soccer around the world, the traditional dominance that the US women’s team enjoyed for so many years will end. It makes for great competition and more enjoyable games, though!
That is what everyone is missing. This was one game. Even though the team looked terrible, it's exciting to see another team play so well. Better soccer for women all over the world is better than the US smashing the competition every match.
Watch the super league or the women’s champions league. That soccer blows away NWSL. They also paid more, have world class facilities and better coaches because those teams are part of a big European club.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think as more young women and girls are raised playing soccer around the world, the traditional dominance that the US women’s team enjoyed for so many years will end. It makes for great competition and more enjoyable games, though!
That is what everyone is missing. This was one game. Even though the team looked terrible, it's exciting to see another team play so well. Better soccer for women all over the world is better than the US smashing the competition every match.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And these observations undercut those who argue, on the men's side, that the US would dominate in soccer if our best athletes played soccer instead of other sports. There's much more to the game than athleticism.
Of course not dominate but competitive, yes. All the other countries are starting with their best athletes as the player pool, then among those best athletes the process finds those with the best non-athletic attributes. The result is great athletes + other attributes. In the US, the starting pool is missing many of the best athletes because they play other sports, so when you take the ones with the best other attributes, it's some good athletes but not the best + other attributes.
No, you have it backwards. They start with the best soccer players. From those, the ones with the necessary athletic attributes progress.
You don't know at 15 who the best athlete is, that is what our problem is. We think we can pick soccer players like we can football or basketball. You can't wait until they grow in soccer before you pick them. You have to develop all who show promise and then let nature take its course.
Anonymous wrote:I think as more young women and girls are raised playing soccer around the world, the traditional dominance that the US women’s team enjoyed for so many years will end. It makes for great competition and more enjoyable games, though!