Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not an expert of plastic surgery or other interventions and I am not going to speculate on that.
But the argument that she is "unrecognizable" or that her appearance is ONLY explicable by fillers or botox or other interventions? I don't get it. Here is what she looked like in Twister in 1996. She currently looks like this woman, exactly, but 30 years later:
![]()
I feel like maybe some folks are simply not familiar with what she has always looked like, to argue she looks so different now. She looks like herself. She may have had some work done, I don't know, but she's also aged. But I would recognize her instantly on the street. She has a number of very striking features and the way her face is composed is distinctive. I think a lot of her popularity as an actress probably owes more to the fact that she had a distinctive face with a strong jaw and a lot of broad planes that came together at sharp angles. That's very camera-friendly bone structure, even if it's not classically feminine or beautiful.
+1 perfect description
Anonymous wrote:My sister has those and has never smoked. Sometimes it is just genes.Anonymous wrote:Ugh, smoking. Look at those upper lip lines.
Anonymous wrote:I am not an expert of plastic surgery or other interventions and I am not going to speculate on that.
But the argument that she is "unrecognizable" or that her appearance is ONLY explicable by fillers or botox or other interventions? I don't get it. Here is what she looked like in Twister in 1996. She currently looks like this woman, exactly, but 30 years later:
![]()
I feel like maybe some folks are simply not familiar with what she has always looked like, to argue she looks so different now. She looks like herself. She may have had some work done, I don't know, but she's also aged. But I would recognize her instantly on the street. She has a number of very striking features and the way her face is composed is distinctive. I think a lot of her popularity as an actress probably owes more to the fact that she had a distinctive face with a strong jaw and a lot of broad planes that came together at sharp angles. That's very camera-friendly bone structure, even if it's not classically feminine or beautiful.
Anonymous wrote:Helen Hunt had no beauty to lose. A BIPOC actress of such mediocre appearance would never have been considered appealing. What people like is her thinness and whiteness.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My sister has those and has never smoked. Sometimes it is just genes.Anonymous wrote:Ugh, smoking. Look at those upper lip lines.
Straws too
Anonymous wrote:My sister has those and has never smoked. Sometimes it is just genes.Anonymous wrote:Ugh, smoking. Look at those upper lip lines.
My sister has those and has never smoked. Sometimes it is just genes.Anonymous wrote:Ugh, smoking. Look at those upper lip lines.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That seems very old looking for 58. I know real life 58 yo people who don't look like that. Has she been sick?
OMG. People age differently.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her skin is awfully smooth. I would say she hasn't had surgery but she has had botox at least.
I agree. Botox or some other kind of injectible?
I really don't think so. Look at the linked photo above- deep expression lines across the forehead wouldn't happen with Botox.
Aftermath of injections/fillers.
Fillers just age super, super poorly.
Not seeing that at all. I think she just looks like she "needs" a lower facelift by standards we expect of Hollywood actresses.
She clearly had fillers. Never, ever get fillers - they will age poorly.
![]()