Anonymous wrote:Engagement isn't marriage. Even marriage can be broken up. People even divorce after having kids.
This is purely about settling the difference between you two. You maybe 100% correct in this but if you are unable to compromise, that makes a terrible partner. Women needsa cheerleader in a marriage, not a thought police.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm your GF (not literally obviously). My BF just bought a place, he's renovating it, this will be done in the fall. He asked me to move in once his renovations are done.
1. Logistically, this is a nightmare. I know renovations, I've lived though them, they often go longer than we expect.
2. I live in a condo that I bought 5 years ago. If I leave I either have to sell or rent, which brings me to point 3.
3. I don't want to sell my home unless I'm engaged. Yes, engagements can be broken. However, asking me to move in is asking for a sacrifice on my end. I'm not willing to do it unless he wants to marry me.
Good for you
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t know 1 person that lived together that didn’t get married.
She sounds high maintenance. Hard pass. Move on.
Oh my goodness, I know so many people who either had long drawn out breakups after living together, or got engaged after 5 years of living together and then got divorced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Neither of you are wrong, but a man wanting to live together or vice versa doesn’t automatically mean they won’t marry you. Usually there are many red flags besides apprehension to get engaged that women ignore. Moving in together doesn’t mean you man won’t propose to you.
This. The red flag that OP should be looking at right now is the issuing of ultimatums and the refusal to come to an agreement that works for them as a couple.
No one issued any ultimatums here. They had a difference of opinion on moving in together before they’re engaged.
And only one person handled it somewhat maturely. I agree with the pp who suggested OP should insist on premarital counseling.
-1 What exactly did OP's girlfriend do that was immature?
I have no regrets about insisting on a ring before moving in. I knew what I wanted, and wasn't willing to play house without a commitment. Knowing what you want and speaking up for yourself, even when your view isn't fashionable, is the definition of maturity.
Married 17 years.
The immaturity comes in insisting things must be entirely your way in a relationship.
That is not immaturity. Acknowledging that there are some differences that are insurmountable in a relationship is part of being an adult. Better to figure out that a man isn't committed before moving in than after.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Neither of you are wrong, but a man wanting to live together or vice versa doesn’t automatically mean they won’t marry you. Usually there are many red flags besides apprehension to get engaged that women ignore. Moving in together doesn’t mean you man won’t propose to you.
This. The red flag that OP should be looking at right now is the issuing of ultimatums and the refusal to come to an agreement that works for them as a couple.
No one issued any ultimatums here. They had a difference of opinion on moving in together before they’re engaged.
And only one person handled it somewhat maturely. I agree with the pp who suggested OP should insist on premarital counseling.
-1 What exactly did OP's girlfriend do that was immature?
I have no regrets about insisting on a ring before moving in. I knew what I wanted, and wasn't willing to play house without a commitment. Knowing what you want and speaking up for yourself, even when your view isn't fashionable, is the definition of maturity.
Married 17 years.
The immaturity comes in insisting things must be entirely your way in a relationship.
That is not immaturity. Acknowledging that there are some differences that are insurmountable in a relationship is part of being an adult. Better to figure out that a man isn't committed before moving in than after.
It's immaturity. A hallmark of immaturity is all or nothing thinking. All my way or not at all. Another mark of immaturity is pinning the success of a relationship only on one person, in this case, the man or OP. My girlfriend is immature, and despite your 17 years of marriage so are you.
Another way to look at this is that she has standards and enough self esteem not to compromise on those standards. If her boyfriend fundamentally disagrees on a future together, then they will BOTH be better off if she doesn’t compromise her standards. Most people who end up bitterly divorced have stayed together hoping the other would change and the only change is increased bitterness and resentment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Neither of you are wrong, but a man wanting to live together or vice versa doesn’t automatically mean they won’t marry you. Usually there are many red flags besides apprehension to get engaged that women ignore. Moving in together doesn’t mean you man won’t propose to you.
This. The red flag that OP should be looking at right now is the issuing of ultimatums and the refusal to come to an agreement that works for them as a couple.
No one issued any ultimatums here. They had a difference of opinion on moving in together before they’re engaged.
And only one person handled it somewhat maturely. I agree with the pp who suggested OP should insist on premarital counseling.
-1 What exactly did OP's girlfriend do that was immature?
I have no regrets about insisting on a ring before moving in. I knew what I wanted, and wasn't willing to play house without a commitment. Knowing what you want and speaking up for yourself, even when your view isn't fashionable, is the definition of maturity.
Married 17 years.
The immaturity comes in insisting things must be entirely your way in a relationship.
That is not immaturity. Acknowledging that there are some differences that are insurmountable in a relationship is part of being an adult. Better to figure out that a man isn't committed before moving in than after.
It's immaturity. A hallmark of immaturity is all or nothing thinking. All my way or not at all. Another mark of immaturity is pinning the success of a relationship only on one person, in this case, the man or OP. My girlfriend is immature, and despite your 17 years of marriage so are you.
Anonymous wrote:OP living together before marriage was a thing long ago — in the 1970-80s. Women figured out it didn’t work out well for them. It was a social experiment. Today’s women not so eager to repeat that.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you’re basics asking her to make all the compromises and you want your parents opinions to carry equal weight as hers. You sound like a nightmare. She should dump you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm your GF (not literally obviously). My BF just bought a place, he's renovating it, this will be done in the fall. He asked me to move in once his renovations are done.
1. Logistically, this is a nightmare. I know renovations, I've lived though them, they often go longer than we expect.
2. I live in a condo that I bought 5 years ago. If I leave I either have to sell or rent, which brings me to point 3.
3. I don't want to sell my home unless I'm engaged. Yes, engagements can be broken. However, asking me to move in is asking for a sacrifice on my end. I'm not willing to do it unless he wants to marry me.
Good for you