Anonymous wrote:
No - I'm not aware because that isn't accurate.
Just last week a long range study of the impact of full reopening of in person instruction in Texas found that the reopening “gradually but substantially accelerated” the spread of coronavirus leading to at least 43,000 additional cases and 800 additional deaths statewide. The study was done by University of Kentucky researchers for the nonpartisan National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and tracked weekly average COVID-19 cases in the eight weeks before and eight weeks after the state’s school districts sent students back to school in the fall.
Thankful that APS and Duran kept our community safe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unbelievable. But honestly OP where is the outrage? Why are people just accepting this, with an occasional “can you believe it” and shake of the head?
Where is the national media? Where are the parents rallying and make the lives of school board members hell? Where are the pro-kid candidates stepping up to replace them?
Answer to your question: the Democratic school board caucus starts today and this is exactly why I'm voting for Miranda Turner, who is the person you are seeking above.
In effect, the Democrats' caucus is the election. Anyone who isn't a Democrat is disenfranchised here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APS is doing a reasonable job trying to protect students in the way the CDC recommends given that almost all students are not fully vaccinated and both masks and distancing are still needed. I don't think they could move to 4 days a week without dumping some of the mitigation measures that the CDC still recommends in schools.
I don't agree with the crowd that has been on the open schools now bandwagon for months even before staff were vaccinated, cases were down, and kids started getting vaccinated. If Miranda Turner is on that bandwagon than I am definitely not for her.
+1000
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APS is doing a reasonable job trying to protect students in the way the CDC recommends given that almost all students are not fully vaccinated and both masks and distancing are still needed. I don't think they could move to 4 days a week without dumping some of the mitigation measures that the CDC still recommends in schools.
I don't agree with the crowd that has been on the open schools now bandwagon for months even before staff were vaccinated, cases were down, and kids started getting vaccinated. If Miranda Turner is on that bandwagon than I am definitely not for her.
+1000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:APS is doing a reasonable job trying to protect students in the way the CDC recommends given that almost all students are not fully vaccinated and both masks and distancing are still needed. I don't think they could move to 4 days a week without dumping some of the mitigation measures that the CDC still recommends in schools.
I don't agree with the crowd that has been on the open schools now bandwagon for months even before staff were vaccinated, cases were down, and kids started getting vaccinated. If Miranda Turner is on that bandwagon than I am definitely not for her.
+1000
Anonymous wrote:APS is doing a reasonable job trying to protect students in the way the CDC recommends given that almost all students are not fully vaccinated and both masks and distancing are still needed. I don't think they could move to 4 days a week without dumping some of the mitigation measures that the CDC still recommends in schools.
I don't agree with the crowd that has been on the open schools now bandwagon for months even before staff were vaccinated, cases were down, and kids started getting vaccinated. If Miranda Turner is on that bandwagon than I am definitely not for her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unbelievable. But honestly OP where is the outrage? Why are people just accepting this, with an occasional “can you believe it” and shake of the head?
Where is the national media? Where are the parents rallying and make the lives of school board members hell? Where are the pro-kid candidates stepping up to replace them?
Answer to your question: the Democratic school board caucus starts today and this is exactly why I'm voting for Miranda Turner, who is the person you are seeking above.
Anonymous wrote:Unbelievable. But honestly OP where is the outrage? Why are people just accepting this, with an occasional “can you believe it” and shake of the head?
Where is the national media? Where are the parents rallying and make the lives of school board members hell? Where are the pro-kid candidates stepping up to replace them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly this is what happens. They beat you down for so long and so hard that you just say forget it, what's even the point. And everyone submits to a new normal. Unless there's a loud and opposing group voicing concerns months ago, this was not going to change. Remember this and remember to vote for school choice so you are not stuck with bare minimum options in the future.
GMAFB. APS handled the pandemic in a reasonable manner. Get over it.
You GMAFB, how is every other school system back 4/5 days a week? APS is not reasonable, not even close. And don't get me started about this summer school fiasco
Not true. MANY other school systems are still hybrid or only have a fraction of kids in school 4 days.
More than 29% are hybrid (doesn't include kids who select virtual hybrid over fulltime)
https://info.burbio.com/school-tracker-update-may-10/
FCPS only offered 4 days to some kids who were already hybrid. Not systemwide.
FCPS, like many schools districts, gave parents several attempts to choose hybrid or virtual. They were clear you couldn’t move between the two after you made your most recent choice. The point is that FCPS saw that there were changes coming and planned for that possibility.They could not implement a plan immediately, because they didn’t know what the change might be but they communicated right after the 6 to 3 feet announcement that FCPS was looking at how to implement that change.
It wasn’t smooth but the vast majority of the kids who were attending 2 days had the option of attending 4 days. And while no one is thrilled with concurrent, there is far less whining and complaining, at least among the ES crowd, now that the kids are back 4 days a week. I am surprised that the parents of kids in virtual are not revolting because concurrent seems to have meant far less virtual instruction.
All of the recent CDC changes were projected weeks in advance, there was no good reason for schools to prepare for what was being discussed ahead of the announcements. You didn’t need a crystal ball to see these things coming.
FCPS isn’t back 4 days. Some kids at some schools in FCPS but not FCPS.
Again, it was a reasonable response - similar to many other school systems.
And APS will be back 5 days in the fall. Get over it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sadly this is what happens. They beat you down for so long and so hard that you just say forget it, what's even the point. And everyone submits to a new normal. Unless there's a loud and opposing group voicing concerns months ago, this was not going to change. Remember this and remember to vote for school choice so you are not stuck with bare minimum options in the future.
GMAFB. APS handled the pandemic in a reasonable manner. Get over it.
You GMAFB, how is every other school system back 4/5 days a week? APS is not reasonable, not even close. And don't get me started about this summer school fiasco
Not true. MANY other school systems are still hybrid or only have a fraction of kids in school 4 days.
More than 29% are hybrid (doesn't include kids who select virtual hybrid over fulltime)
https://info.burbio.com/school-tracker-update-may-10/
FCPS only offered 4 days to some kids who were already hybrid. Not systemwide.
FCPS, like many schools districts, gave parents several attempts to choose hybrid or virtual. They were clear you couldn’t move between the two after you made your most recent choice. The point is that FCPS saw that there were changes coming and planned for that possibility.They could not implement a plan immediately, because they didn’t know what the change might be but they communicated right after the 6 to 3 feet announcement that FCPS was looking at how to implement that change.
It wasn’t smooth but the vast majority of the kids who were attending 2 days had the option of attending 4 days. And while no one is thrilled with concurrent, there is far less whining and complaining, at least among the ES crowd, now that the kids are back 4 days a week. I am surprised that the parents of kids in virtual are not revolting because concurrent seems to have meant far less virtual instruction.
All of the recent CDC changes were projected weeks in advance, there was no good reason for schools to prepare for what was being discussed ahead of the announcements. You didn’t need a crystal ball to see these things coming.