Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
Clearly you have never stood in a line for 7+ hours to vote.
Others have. Understand, people are put through hardships just to be able to exercise their unaleinable right to vote.
7 hrs where?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
Clearly you have never stood in a line for 7+ hours to vote.
Others have. Understand, people are put through hardships just to be able to exercise their unaleinable right to vote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
Clearly you have never stood in a line for 7+ hours to vote.
Others have. Understand, people are put through hardships just to be able to exercise their unaleinable right to vote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
Make the voting easy and accessible so the lines are short enough for people not to need food and water. Duh. If that’s what they are really concerned about. But they just don’t want people to vote. Making it hard and arduous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
There's plenty of things people don't "need." Is that the new standard did making something illegal? I thought I lived in a free country.
DP.
Please. Other states have similar laws. It is all about preventing electioneering. They can set up water stations if they so desire...... perfectly legal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
There's plenty of things people don't "need." Is that the new standard did making something illegal? I thought I lived in a free country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
Make the voting easy and accessible so the lines are short enough for people not to need food and water. Duh. If that’s what they are really concerned about. But they just don’t want people to vote. Making it hard and arduous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.
Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What this is really about is Stacey Abrams needs mail in ballots without signature verification to win.
Thus, anyone opposing this must be a Jimmy eagle racist.
The only reason she didn't win last time is because the former Secretary of State, who also happened to be the GOP Gubinatorial candidate, rigged the election in his favor. Fact is, she can win in a fair election. Play by the 2018 or 2020 rules, she will win. With these new rules in place, where the state can subsume county officials, the GOP will simply run roughshod over the process.