Getting back to SB 1303 - is there any update on this bill?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SR lost credibility when it kept moving goal posts. It came off as dishonesty. I was on their side but couldn't when they started that.

What we knew in the fall was much different than what we know now.

NO. The guidance is the exact same from the Fall as it is now.

What you know now is how dumb it was to keep schools closed.

What SR “knew” in the fall is different from what SR “knows” now, but that’s not the same thing as what experts knew in the fall vs. what experts know now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SR lost credibility when it kept moving goal posts. It came off as dishonesty. I was on their side but couldn't when they started that.

What we knew in the fall was much different than what we know now.

NO. The guidance is the exact same from the Fall as it is now.

What you know now is how dumb it was to keep schools closed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the APE crowd is too stupid to thank the safety folks for getting what schools need to open.

The SR crowd is too arrogant to appreciate how little value they’ve contributed to the discussion.

Stop being so childish by continuing to deny that SR made a positive contribution to our schools openly safely.

They pushed for the data.
They pushed for the analysis.
They pushed for the air cleaners.

I don’t get why you are denying this.

Okay, here’s your participation trophy.

Why deny their contributions?

FWIW I’m not even a member of SR. I just detest irrational jerks trying to crap on other people who are making a difference.

Aw, did you want a cookie instead? The pandemic is causing some people to stress eat, but it’s really not good for you.

I don’t want anything for myself.

But if you can’t muster an ounce of intellectual honesty and give a sincere “thanks” to SR then at least shut up already. Your pettiness is getting old.

If that’s the standard you’re going by, you should be thanking me as well because I did email Duran and board with my concerns about the masking policy, which has since changed. You’re welcome.

But I still think SR has been more of a hindrance than a help.

What were your concerns about the masking policy?

Oh, so now you think there should be room for debate over whether someone’s safety advocacy was constructive or not?

Were they in line with Harvard Chan’s recommendations?

LOL, such a hypocrite.

SR has been pushing concerns about how APS measures up to expert recommendations.

And you? Were your concerns based on expert recommendations?

Let me guess, you wanted masks to be optional.

You couldn't be more wrong. About many things.

How am I wrong?

SR has been pushing for recommendations from Harvard Chan. I’m grateful they’ve been doing that.

If you were also pushing recommendations from respected experts (not the MyPillowGuy), I’d say thank you to you too.

Go back, read the discussion again, and figure out why you are making a fool of yourself right now. It might take a little critical thinking, but I certainly hope you're capable of that.

SR helped our community by advocating for important safety measures that were recommended by experts. They pushed APS to do this. The only debate here is why is tough for people people to stop being petty and recognize that.

Read the bolded, and then try to understand how you are showing your ass all over the place when you accuse the pp of advocating for masks being optional and policies recommended by the MyPillow Guy. If this is the level of critical thinking that goes into SR's analysis, that's one more reason not to trust their conclusions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the APE crowd is too stupid to thank the safety folks for getting what schools need to open.

The SR crowd is too arrogant to appreciate how little value they’ve contributed to the discussion.

Stop being so childish by continuing to deny that SR made a positive contribution to our schools openly safely.

They pushed for the data.
They pushed for the analysis.
They pushed for the air cleaners.

I don’t get why you are denying this.

Okay, here’s your participation trophy.

Why deny their contributions?

FWIW I’m not even a member of SR. I just detest irrational jerks trying to crap on other people who are making a difference.

Aw, did you want a cookie instead? The pandemic is causing some people to stress eat, but it’s really not good for you.

I don’t want anything for myself.

But if you can’t muster an ounce of intellectual honesty and give a sincere “thanks” to SR then at least shut up already. Your pettiness is getting old.

If that’s the standard you’re going by, you should be thanking me as well because I did email Duran and board with my concerns about the masking policy, which has since changed. You’re welcome.

But I still think SR has been more of a hindrance than a help.

What were your concerns about the masking policy?

Oh, so now you think there should be room for debate over whether someone’s safety advocacy was constructive or not?

Were they in line with Harvard Chan’s recommendations?

LOL, such a hypocrite.

SR has been pushing concerns about how APS measures up to expert recommendations.

And you? Were your concerns based on expert recommendations?

Let me guess, you wanted masks to be optional.

You couldn't be more wrong. About many things.

How am I wrong?

SR has been pushing for recommendations from Harvard Chan. I’m grateful they’ve been doing that.

If you were also pushing recommendations from respected experts (not the MyPillowGuy), I’d say thank you to you too.

Go back, read the discussion again, and figure out why you are making a fool of yourself right now. It might take a little critical thinking, but I certainly hope you're capable of that.

SR helped our community by advocating for important safety measures that were recommended by experts. They pushed APS to do this. The only debate here is why is tough for people people to stop being petty and recognize that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the APE crowd is too stupid to thank the safety folks for getting what schools need to open.

The SR crowd is too arrogant to appreciate how little value they’ve contributed to the discussion.

Stop being so childish by continuing to deny that SR made a positive contribution to our schools openly safely.

They pushed for the data.
They pushed for the analysis.
They pushed for the air cleaners.

I don’t get why you are denying this.

Okay, here’s your participation trophy.

Why deny their contributions?

FWIW I’m not even a member of SR. I just detest irrational jerks trying to crap on other people who are making a difference.

Aw, did you want a cookie instead? The pandemic is causing some people to stress eat, but it’s really not good for you.

I don’t want anything for myself.

But if you can’t muster an ounce of intellectual honesty and give a sincere “thanks” to SR then at least shut up already. Your pettiness is getting old.

If that’s the standard you’re going by, you should be thanking me as well because I did email Duran and board with my concerns about the masking policy, which has since changed. You’re welcome.

But I still think SR has been more of a hindrance than a help.

What were your concerns about the masking policy?

Oh, so now you think there should be room for debate over whether someone’s safety advocacy was constructive or not?

Were they in line with Harvard Chan’s recommendations?

LOL, such a hypocrite.

SR has been pushing concerns about how APS measures up to expert recommendations.

And you? Were your concerns based on expert recommendations?

Let me guess, you wanted masks to be optional.

You couldn't be more wrong. About many things.

How am I wrong?

SR has been pushing for recommendations from Harvard Chan. I’m grateful they’ve been doing that.

If you were also pushing recommendations from respected experts (not the MyPillowGuy), I’d say thank you to you too.

Go back, read the discussion again, and figure out why you are making a fool of yourself right now. It might take a little critical thinking, but I certainly hope you're capable of that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the APE crowd is too stupid to thank the safety folks for getting what schools need to open.

The SR crowd is too arrogant to appreciate how little value they’ve contributed to the discussion.

Stop being so childish by continuing to deny that SR made a positive contribution to our schools openly safely.

They pushed for the data.
They pushed for the analysis.
They pushed for the air cleaners.

I don’t get why you are denying this.

Okay, here’s your participation trophy.

Why deny their contributions?

FWIW I’m not even a member of SR. I just detest irrational jerks trying to crap on other people who are making a difference.

Aw, did you want a cookie instead? The pandemic is causing some people to stress eat, but it’s really not good for you.

I don’t want anything for myself.

But if you can’t muster an ounce of intellectual honesty and give a sincere “thanks” to SR then at least shut up already. Your pettiness is getting old.

If that’s the standard you’re going by, you should be thanking me as well because I did email Duran and board with my concerns about the masking policy, which has since changed. You’re welcome.

But I still think SR has been more of a hindrance than a help.

What were your concerns about the masking policy?

Oh, so now you think there should be room for debate over whether someone’s safety advocacy was constructive or not?

Were they in line with Harvard Chan’s recommendations?

LOL, such a hypocrite.

SR has been pushing concerns about how APS measures up to expert recommendations.

And you? Were your concerns based on expert recommendations?

Let me guess, you wanted masks to be optional.

You couldn't be more wrong. About many things.

How am I wrong?

SR has been pushing for recommendations from Harvard Chan. I’m grateful they’ve been doing that.

If you were also pushing recommendations from respected experts (not the MyPillowGuy), I’d say thank you to you too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the APE crowd is too stupid to thank the safety folks for getting what schools need to open.

The SR crowd is too arrogant to appreciate how little value they’ve contributed to the discussion.

Stop being so childish by continuing to deny that SR made a positive contribution to our schools openly safely.

They pushed for the data.
They pushed for the analysis.
They pushed for the air cleaners.

I don’t get why you are denying this.

Okay, here’s your participation trophy.

Why deny their contributions?

FWIW I’m not even a member of SR. I just detest irrational jerks trying to crap on other people who are making a difference.

Aw, did you want a cookie instead? The pandemic is causing some people to stress eat, but it’s really not good for you.

I don’t want anything for myself.

But if you can’t muster an ounce of intellectual honesty and give a sincere “thanks” to SR then at least shut up already. Your pettiness is getting old.

If that’s the standard you’re going by, you should be thanking me as well because I did email Duran and board with my concerns about the masking policy, which has since changed. You’re welcome.

But I still think SR has been more of a hindrance than a help.

What were your concerns about the masking policy?

Oh, so now you think there should be room for debate over whether someone’s safety advocacy was constructive or not?

Were they in line with Harvard Chan’s recommendations?

LOL, such a hypocrite.

SR has been pushing concerns about how APS measures up to expert recommendations.

And you? Were your concerns based on expert recommendations?

Let me guess, you wanted masks to be optional.

Did Duran make masks optional? If not, this was a truly stupid comment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the APE crowd is too stupid to thank the safety folks for getting what schools need to open.

The SR crowd is too arrogant to appreciate how little value they’ve contributed to the discussion.

Stop being so childish by continuing to deny that SR made a positive contribution to our schools openly safely.

They pushed for the data.
They pushed for the analysis.
They pushed for the air cleaners.

I don’t get why you are denying this.

Okay, here’s your participation trophy.

Why deny their contributions?

FWIW I’m not even a member of SR. I just detest irrational jerks trying to crap on other people who are making a difference.

Aw, did you want a cookie instead? The pandemic is causing some people to stress eat, but it’s really not good for you.

I don’t want anything for myself.

But if you can’t muster an ounce of intellectual honesty and give a sincere “thanks” to SR then at least shut up already. Your pettiness is getting old.

If that’s the standard you’re going by, you should be thanking me as well because I did email Duran and board with my concerns about the masking policy, which has since changed. You’re welcome.

But I still think SR has been more of a hindrance than a help.

What were your concerns about the masking policy?

Oh, so now you think there should be room for debate over whether someone’s safety advocacy was constructive or not?

Were they in line with Harvard Chan’s recommendations?

LOL, such a hypocrite.

SR has been pushing concerns about how APS measures up to expert recommendations.

And you? Were your concerns based on expert recommendations?

Let me guess, you wanted masks to be optional.

You couldn't be more wrong. About many things.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the APE crowd is too stupid to thank the safety folks for getting what schools need to open.

The SR crowd is too arrogant to appreciate how little value they’ve contributed to the discussion.

Stop being so childish by continuing to deny that SR made a positive contribution to our schools openly safely.

They pushed for the data.
They pushed for the analysis.
They pushed for the air cleaners.

I don’t get why you are denying this.

Okay, here’s your participation trophy.

Why deny their contributions?

FWIW I’m not even a member of SR. I just detest irrational jerks trying to crap on other people who are making a difference.

Aw, did you want a cookie instead? The pandemic is causing some people to stress eat, but it’s really not good for you.

I don’t want anything for myself.

But if you can’t muster an ounce of intellectual honesty and give a sincere “thanks” to SR then at least shut up already. Your pettiness is getting old.

If that’s the standard you’re going by, you should be thanking me as well because I did email Duran and board with my concerns about the masking policy, which has since changed. You’re welcome.

But I still think SR has been more of a hindrance than a help.

What were your concerns about the masking policy?

Oh, so now you think there should be room for debate over whether someone’s safety advocacy was constructive or not?

Were they in line with Harvard Chan’s recommendations?

LOL, such a hypocrite.

SR has been pushing concerns about how APS measures up to expert recommendations.

And you? Were your concerns based on expert recommendations?

Let me guess, you wanted masks to be optional.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the APE crowd is too stupid to thank the safety folks for getting what schools need to open.

The SR crowd is too arrogant to appreciate how little value they’ve contributed to the discussion.

Stop being so childish by continuing to deny that SR made a positive contribution to our schools openly safely.

They pushed for the data.
They pushed for the analysis.
They pushed for the air cleaners.

I don’t get why you are denying this.

Okay, here’s your participation trophy.

Why deny their contributions?

FWIW I’m not even a member of SR. I just detest irrational jerks trying to crap on other people who are making a difference.

Aw, did you want a cookie instead? The pandemic is causing some people to stress eat, but it’s really not good for you.

I don’t want anything for myself.

But if you can’t muster an ounce of intellectual honesty and give a sincere “thanks” to SR then at least shut up already. Your pettiness is getting old.

If that’s the standard you’re going by, you should be thanking me as well because I did email Duran and board with my concerns about the masking policy, which has since changed. You’re welcome.

But I still think SR has been more of a hindrance than a help.

What were your concerns about the masking policy?

Oh, so now you think there should be room for debate over whether someone’s safety advocacy was constructive or not?

Were they in line with Harvard Chan’s recommendations?

LOL, such a hypocrite.

Anonymous wrote:SR lost credibility when it kept moving goal posts. It came off as dishonesty. I was on their side but couldn't when they started that.

What we knew in the fall was much different than what we know now.

SR lost credibility when it kept moving goal posts. It came off as dishonesty. I was on their side but couldn't when they started that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the APE crowd is too stupid to thank the safety folks for getting what schools need to open.

The SR crowd is too arrogant to appreciate how little value they’ve contributed to the discussion.

Stop being so childish by continuing to deny that SR made a positive contribution to our schools openly safely.

They pushed for the data.
They pushed for the analysis.
They pushed for the air cleaners.

I don’t get why you are denying this.

Okay, here’s your participation trophy.

Why deny their contributions?

FWIW I’m not even a member of SR. I just detest irrational jerks trying to crap on other people who are making a difference.

Aw, did you want a cookie instead? The pandemic is causing some people to stress eat, but it’s really not good for you.

I don’t want anything for myself.

But if you can’t muster an ounce of intellectual honesty and give a sincere “thanks” to SR then at least shut up already. Your pettiness is getting old.

If that’s the standard you’re going by, you should be thanking me as well because I did email Duran and board with my concerns about the masking policy, which has since changed. You’re welcome.

But I still think SR has been more of a hindrance than a help.

What were your concerns about the masking policy?

Oh, so now you think there should be room for debate over whether someone’s safety advocacy was constructive or not?

Were they in line with Harvard Chan’s recommendations?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the APE crowd is too stupid to thank the safety folks for getting what schools need to open.

The SR crowd is too arrogant to appreciate how little value they’ve contributed to the discussion.

Stop being so childish by continuing to deny that SR made a positive contribution to our schools openly safely.

They pushed for the data.
They pushed for the analysis.
They pushed for the air cleaners.

I don’t get why you are denying this.

Okay, here’s your participation trophy.

Why deny their contributions?

FWIW I’m not even a member of SR. I just detest irrational jerks trying to crap on other people who are making a difference.

Aw, did you want a cookie instead? The pandemic is causing some people to stress eat, but it’s really not good for you.

I don’t want anything for myself.

But if you can’t muster an ounce of intellectual honesty and give a sincere “thanks” to SR then at least shut up already. Your pettiness is getting old.

If that’s the standard you’re going by, you should be thanking me as well because I did email Duran and board with my concerns about the masking policy, which has since changed. You’re welcome.

But I still think SR has been more of a hindrance than a help.

What were your concerns about the masking policy?

Oh, so now you think there should be room for debate over whether someone’s safety advocacy was constructive or not?