Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with opening elementary! Always have. Not middle and high unless you cohort them. They are cohorted for student AND teacher safety. To minimize the number of people you come in contact with. Does no one get that?
From what I have read by epidemiologists who believe in opening, cohorting is good, but not strictly required IF you use other mitigation measures (6' distance, masks, sick people staying home).
Cohorting actually allows you to do things like drop the 6' requirement, as does low community spread.
There will be parents that send their kids to school sick. Gonna happen.
And the teachers will be fine. Once the second shot kicks in, teachers will be nearly bullet proof. Add in the backdrop that class sizes will be so low, that the odds of a classroom having an infection are also low.
"Maccabi said it has 128,600 members who have seen seven days pass since full vaccine protection kicked in — and only 20 [0.015 percent] have caught the coronavirus after they were considered immunized. Ekka Zohar also noted that she found that none of the 20 vaccinees was hospitalized or suffered from a fever higher than 38.5 degrees."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/week-after-2nd-pfizer-vaccine-shot-only-20-of-128000-israelis-get-covid/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with opening elementary! Always have. Not middle and high unless you cohort them. They are cohorted for student AND teacher safety. To minimize the number of people you come in contact with. Does no one get that?
From what I have read by epidemiologists who believe in opening, cohorting is good, but not strictly required IF you use other mitigation measures (6' distance, masks, sick people staying home).
Cohorting actually allows you to do things like drop the 6' requirement, as does low community spread.
There will be parents that send their kids to school sick. Gonna happen.
And the teachers will be fine. Once the second shot kicks in, teachers will be nearly bullet proof. Add in the backdrop that class sizes will be so low, that the odds of a classroom having an infection are also low.
"Maccabi said it has 128,600 members who have seen seven days pass since full vaccine protection kicked in — and only 20 [0.015 percent] have caught the coronavirus after they were considered immunized. Ekka Zohar also noted that she found that none of the 20 vaccinees was hospitalized or suffered from a fever higher than 38.5 degrees."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/week-after-2nd-pfizer-vaccine-shot-only-20-of-128000-israelis-get-covid/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with opening elementary! Always have. Not middle and high unless you cohort them. They are cohorted for student AND teacher safety. To minimize the number of people you come in contact with. Does no one get that?
From what I have read by epidemiologists who believe in opening, cohorting is good, but not strictly required IF you use other mitigation measures (6' distance, masks, sick people staying home).
Cohorting actually allows you to do things like drop the 6' requirement, as does low community spread.
There will be parents that send their kids to school sick. Gonna happen.
Absolutely. They also take pride in it and getting teachers sick. They’ll play party music upon return to school. It’s been said here and they’re happy to see teachers as indentured servants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CDC team reviewed data from studies in the United States and abroad and found the experience in schools different from nursing homes and high-density worksites where rapid spread has occurred.
“The preponderance of available evidence from the fall school semester has been reassuring,” wrote three CDC researchers in a viewpoint piece published online Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association. “There has been little evidence that schools have contributed meaningfully to increased community transmission.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/cdc-school-virus-spread/2021/01/26/bf949222-5fe6-11eb-9061-07abcc1f9229_story.html
The only discussion we should be having now is how fast we should be opening.
Please email this to all SB reps!!!!
Also email them today’s numbers:
874/100,000
15.1% PPR
I don’t care. I am sick of the “community spread!” crap. It’s being spreading through the community for a year. And will continue. And I still don’t care.
Go. To. School.
Give a date 1 week from today. No exemptions. Show up or get fired.
Yes, we know you don't care. You have all made that loudly, repeatedly and abundantly clear. Luckily, selfish parents have absolutely no say in when schools do or don't open, and they're sure as hell not going to "give a date 1 week from today. No exemptions. Show up or get fired."
LOL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with opening elementary! Always have. Not middle and high unless you cohort them. They are cohorted for student AND teacher safety. To minimize the number of people you come in contact with. Does no one get that?
From what I have read by epidemiologists who believe in opening, cohorting is good, but not strictly required IF you use other mitigation measures (6' distance, masks, sick people staying home).
Cohorting actually allows you to do things like drop the 6' requirement, as does low community spread.
There will be parents that send their kids to school sick. Gonna happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CDC team reviewed data from studies in the United States and abroad and found the experience in schools different from nursing homes and high-density worksites where rapid spread has occurred.
“The preponderance of available evidence from the fall school semester has been reassuring,” wrote three CDC researchers in a viewpoint piece published online Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association. “There has been little evidence that schools have contributed meaningfully to increased community transmission.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/cdc-school-virus-spread/2021/01/26/bf949222-5fe6-11eb-9061-07abcc1f9229_story.html
The only discussion we should be having now is how fast we should be opening.
Please email this to all SB reps!!!!
Also email them today’s numbers:
874/100,000
15.1% PPR
I don’t care. I am sick of the “community spread!” crap. It’s being spreading through the community for a year. And will continue. And I still don’t care.
Go. To. School.
Give a date 1 week from today. No exemptions. Show up or get fired.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with opening elementary! Always have. Not middle and high unless you cohort them. They are cohorted for student AND teacher safety. To minimize the number of people you come in contact with. Does no one get that?
From what I have read by epidemiologists who believe in opening, cohorting is good, but not strictly required IF you use other mitigation measures (6' distance, masks, sick people staying home).
Cohorting actually allows you to do things like drop the 6' requirement, as does low community spread.
There will be parents that send their kids to school sick. Gonna happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with opening elementary! Always have. Not middle and high unless you cohort them. They are cohorted for student AND teacher safety. To minimize the number of people you come in contact with. Does no one get that?
From what I have read by epidemiologists who believe in opening, cohorting is good, but not strictly required IF you use other mitigation measures (6' distance, masks, sick people staying home).
Cohorting actually allows you to do things like drop the 6' requirement, as does low community spread.
Anonymous wrote:You forgot this paragraph. Which sort of kills the APS and FCPS plan for middle and high school. Cohorts are needed: this was obvious in July.
The CDC recommends that schools require masks, allow for a distance of six feet between people and keep students in cohorts to limit the number of people who must quarantine in the case of an exposure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CDC team reviewed data from studies in the United States and abroad and found the experience in schools different from nursing homes and high-density worksites where rapid spread has occurred.
“The preponderance of available evidence from the fall school semester has been reassuring,” wrote three CDC researchers in a viewpoint piece published online Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association. “There has been little evidence that schools have contributed meaningfully to increased community transmission.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/cdc-school-virus-spread/2021/01/26/bf949222-5fe6-11eb-9061-07abcc1f9229_story.html
The only discussion we should be having now is how fast we should be opening.
Please email this to all SB reps!!!!
Also email them today’s numbers:
874/100,000
15.1% PPR
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The CDC team reviewed data from studies in the United States and abroad and found the experience in schools different from nursing homes and high-density worksites where rapid spread has occurred.
“The preponderance of available evidence from the fall school semester has been reassuring,” wrote three CDC researchers in a viewpoint piece published online Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association. “There has been little evidence that schools have contributed meaningfully to increased community transmission.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/cdc-school-virus-spread/2021/01/26/bf949222-5fe6-11eb-9061-07abcc1f9229_story.html
The only discussion we should be having now is how fast we should be opening.
Please email this to all SB reps!!!!
Also email them today’s numbers:
874/100,000
15.1% PPR
Anonymous wrote:All the northern VA systems have ignored the recommendations to cohort for middle and high. The CDC said today it is a component of safe opening, right up with masks and distancing. But they continue to ignore it