Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lee is in no hurry. I wish they had some plan. They arent even at the first step yet. This worries me. Our child will not get a turn yet, but hard to believe that they (like so many other schools) think that there are ZERO kids in the school need this. I believe that they too are pandering to the teacher's wants more than the kid's needs.
This is what every school is doing, and it's starting to be too much. I think the tipping point is here, parents. We need to speak out loudly now, particularly if DCPS fudges their reopen next week.
At the VERY LEAST every school needs to be open by early March when teachers are vaccinated. Ideally fully open, with just a few kids staying home (keep an option but emphasize it's not recommended).
Anonymous wrote:Why should parents who are happy with the status quo have to ask the school to talk to the parents and have a plan? I'm not really sure I understand what that means. Sounds like you're not happy. Have you asked the school for a plan? Why is it on other parents to do that for you?
Anonymous wrote:Why should parents who are happy with the status quo have to ask the school to talk to the parents and have a plan? I'm not really sure I understand what that means. Sounds like you're not happy. Have you asked the school for a plan? Why is it on other parents to do that for you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lee is in no hurry. I wish they had some plan. They arent even at the first step yet. This worries me. Our child will not get a turn yet, but hard to believe that they (like so many other schools) think that there are ZERO kids in the school need this. I believe that they too are pandering to the teacher's wants more than the kid's needs.
This is what every school is doing, and it's starting to be too much. I think the tipping point is here, parents. We need to speak out loudly now, particularly if DCPS fudges their reopen next week.
At the VERY LEAST every school needs to be open by early March when teachers are vaccinated. Ideally fully open, with just a few kids staying home (keep an option but emphasize it's not recommended).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any stokes parents here? It seems most kids will not be going back at all this year (except for nwea testing). Did I read that correctly?
Sisters kids go to stokes. She said they called it early and made it clear early on that they would not see a classroom this year (although there are kids with IEPs etc on site)
Stokes parent here. Just clarify because pp makes it sound like a they have a CARES type classroom open the school just announced 36 kids total (at risk) will return to the building at the start of the third trimester. This overdue and I’m glad they are finally helping a few at risk kids. The rest of scholars will remain DL. They have devised a plan to bring kids in to do testing (not sure why there is so much emphasis on this and not a real reopening plan). At the presentation to the board in January there was discussion of a plan to bring back pk-k which makes zero sense since PK is not mandatory. No idea why they wouldn’t start with K and work up to 5 first but there has been little transparency about anything. I think DL for fall 2021 - maybe the whole year. There doesn’t seem to be any energy or desire by the administration to go back to in person 😔.
Did they really say they expect DL for fall too? Wow. I don’t see how they could already make that call... most adults should be vaccinated by summer
NP - they haven‘t said anything about fall 2021. I believe that is just PP’s speculation and in my opinion wouldn’t align with what was said during the board meeting about looking to bring back PK-K students in some form this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lee is in no hurry. I wish they had some plan. They arent even at the first step yet. This worries me. Our child will not get a turn yet, but hard to believe that they (like so many other schools) think that there are ZERO kids in the school need this. I believe that they too are pandering to the teacher's wants more than the kid's needs.
Charter school teachers cannot be vaccinated unless they are in person and don’t want to be in person until they’re vaccinated. We have a real chicken and egg situation here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any stokes parents here? It seems most kids will not be going back at all this year (except for nwea testing). Did I read that correctly?
Sisters kids go to stokes. She said they called it early and made it clear early on that they would not see a classroom this year (although there are kids with IEPs etc on site)
Stokes parent here. Just clarify because pp makes it sound like a they have a CARES type classroom open the school just announced 36 kids total (at risk) will return to the building at the start of the third trimester. This overdue and I’m glad they are finally helping a few at risk kids. The rest of scholars will remain DL. They have devised a plan to bring kids in to do testing (not sure why there is so much emphasis on this and not a real reopening plan). At the presentation to the board in January there was discussion of a plan to bring back pk-k which makes zero sense since PK is not mandatory. No idea why they wouldn’t start with K and work up to 5 first but there has been little transparency about anything. I think DL for fall 2021 - maybe the whole year. There doesn’t seem to be any energy or desire by the administration to go back to in person 😔.
Did they really say they expect DL for fall too? Wow. I don’t see how they could already make that call... most adults should be vaccinated by summer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lee is in no hurry. I wish they had some plan. They arent even at the first step yet. This worries me. Our child will not get a turn yet, but hard to believe that they (like so many other schools) think that there are ZERO kids in the school need this. I believe that they too are pandering to the teacher's wants more than the kid's needs.
Charter school teachers cannot be vaccinated unless they are in person and don’t want to be in person until they’re vaccinated. We have a real chicken and egg situation here.
Anonymous wrote:Lee is in no hurry. I wish they had some plan. They arent even at the first step yet. This worries me. Our child will not get a turn yet, but hard to believe that they (like so many other schools) think that there are ZERO kids in the school need this. I believe that they too are pandering to the teacher's wants more than the kid's needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any stokes parents here? It seems most kids will not be going back at all this year (except for nwea testing). Did I read that correctly?
Sisters kids go to stokes. She said they called it early and made it clear early on that they would not see a classroom this year (although there are kids with IEPs etc on site)
Stokes parent here. Just clarify because pp makes it sound like a they have a CARES type classroom open the school just announced 36 kids total (at risk) will return to the building at the start of the third trimester. This overdue and I’m glad they are finally helping a few at risk kids. The rest of scholars will remain DL. They have devised a plan to bring kids in to do testing (not sure why there is so much emphasis on this and not a real reopening plan). At the presentation to the board in January there was discussion of a plan to bring back pk-k which makes zero sense since PK is not mandatory. No idea why they wouldn’t start with K and work up to 5 first but there has been little transparency about anything. I think DL for fall 2021 - maybe the whole year. There doesn’t seem to be any energy or desire by the administration to go back to in person 😔.
Did they really say they expect DL for fall too? Wow. I don’t see how they could already make that call... most adults should be vaccinated by summer
NP - they haven‘t said anything about fall 2021. I believe that is just PP’s speculation and in my opinion wouldn’t align with what was said during the board meeting about looking to bring back PK-K students in some form this year.
Anonymous wrote:Lee is in no hurry. I wish they had some plan. They arent even at the first step yet. This worries me. Our child will not get a turn yet, but hard to believe that they (like so many other schools) think that there are ZERO kids in the school need this. I believe that they too are pandering to the teacher's wants more than the kid's needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any stokes parents here? It seems most kids will not be going back at all this year (except for nwea testing). Did I read that correctly?
Sisters kids go to stokes. She said they called it early and made it clear early on that they would not see a classroom this year (although there are kids with IEPs etc on site)
Stokes parent here. Just clarify because pp makes it sound like a they have a CARES type classroom open the school just announced 36 kids total (at risk) will return to the building at the start of the third trimester. This overdue and I’m glad they are finally helping a few at risk kids. The rest of scholars will remain DL. They have devised a plan to bring kids in to do testing (not sure why there is so much emphasis on this and not a real reopening plan). At the presentation to the board in January there was discussion of a plan to bring back pk-k which makes zero sense since PK is not mandatory. No idea why they wouldn’t start with K and work up to 5 first but there has been little transparency about anything. I think DL for fall 2021 - maybe the whole year. There doesn’t seem to be any energy or desire by the administration to go back to in person 😔.
Did they really say they expect DL for fall too? Wow. I don’t see how they could already make that call... most adults should be vaccinated by summer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any stokes parents here? It seems most kids will not be going back at all this year (except for nwea testing). Did I read that correctly?
Sisters kids go to stokes. She said they called it early and made it clear early on that they would not see a classroom this year (although there are kids with IEPs etc on site)
Stokes parent here. Just clarify because pp makes it sound like a they have a CARES type classroom open the school just announced 36 kids total (at risk) will return to the building at the start of the third trimester. This overdue and I’m glad they are finally helping a few at risk kids. The rest of scholars will remain DL. They have devised a plan to bring kids in to do testing (not sure why there is so much emphasis on this and not a real reopening plan). At the presentation to the board in January there was discussion of a plan to bring back pk-k which makes zero sense since PK is not mandatory. No idea why they wouldn’t start with K and work up to 5 first but there has been little transparency about anything. I think DL for fall 2021 - maybe the whole year. There doesn’t seem to be any energy or desire by the administration to go back to in person 😔.