Anonymous wrote:Let’s critic Anderson Coopers hair next.
Oh wait. Men only get evaluated based on the quality of their actual work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s critic Anderson Coopers hair next.
Oh wait. Men only get evaluated based on the quality of their actual work.
Ok. Start a new thread. Bye.
Anonymous wrote:Let’s critic Anderson Coopers hair next.
Oh wait. Men only get evaluated based on the quality of their actual work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her natural coloring is dark brown/ black hair and light blue eyes. The fake tan and brassy light brown are an affront to her natural coloring. She looks terrible with a tan ( which is surely fake because Irish skin goes straight to sunburn).
The permanent frown she always has just makes it worse. She makes a million dollars a year and can feign interest for a few hours without scowling.
I have blue eyes and her naturally dark hair. It’s how I look best. I’m Irish/Italian and I tan very, very easily (don’t burn), but I can get more fair in the winter.
Now that I’m 50- the dark hair is even more important than that brassy in between color a lot of women go to with age because somebody told them you need to go lighter older. It’s not true for everyone. Sandra Bullock and Angelina look awful lighter- as blondes.
DP. Completely agree. I'm a very fair-skinned brunette - dark brown hair, almost black - and would look terrible if I went lighter. I did consider it a few times, but keep coming back to the fact that I just look better with very dark hair. My skin tone is "cool" and any warmth around my face makes me look sick and sallow. I honestly can't think of one naturally brunette actress who looked better after going lighter.
Yep. Jennifer Connelly is another one that looks awful blonde.
+1
Rose Byrne, Megan Fox, Dua Lipa, Eiza Gonzalez, Selena Gomez, Lucy Hale... all look so much better with their natural brunette hair.