Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Total BS. I drive on Beach Drive and Rock Creek Parkway daily and there are multiple douchebags in their idiotic outfits who think they are just too special for the perfectly good bike path right next to it. I bike a lot as well and when I have to be on the road, and there are 10 cars respectfully trailing along behind me, I move to the side and let them pass. Why is this so difficult?

Bikers who commute wear their outfits because it helps with comfort, not style. ( for the most part) I tried wearing regular pants and after a long ride it physically chafed and hurt my inner thighs like you wouldn't believe. Bikes are allowed on those roads and you will be better off if you just relax and leave earlier. Less stress.

Also, if you wear regular clothes and a driver hits you, then the police put "wearing dark clothing" in the crash report. Drivers already somehow manage to not see me when I'm wearing day-glo colors in the middle of the day right in front of them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Total BS. I drive on Beach Drive and Rock Creek Parkway daily and there are multiple douchebags in their idiotic outfits who think they are just too special for the perfectly good bike path right next to it. I bike a lot as well and when I have to be on the road, and there are 10 cars respectfully trailing along behind me, I move to the side and let them pass. Why is this so difficult?

Bikers who commute wear their outfits because it helps with comfort, not style. ( for the most part) I tried wearing regular pants and after a long ride it physically chafed and hurt my inner thighs like you wouldn't believe. Bikes are allowed on those roads and you will be better off if you just relax and leave earlier. Less stress.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you you think going to the front of the line in waiting traffic is a better idea? So even more people are stuck behind you again?

You should give that some more thought.

When I'm on a bike, I make the choices that increase my safety.

When I'm driving, I make the choices that protect bicyclists and other vulnerable road users (for example, pedestrians). Because I'm not a jerk.

How does not stopping and waiting in line like everyone else increase your safety? Sounds more like it flatters your vanity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cyclists-why do you think it's ok to take up a hobby that will inconvenience numerous people you've never met? What's wrong with the bike trails? Also keep in mind that not only do I have to safely pass you but seven other idiots within the next quarter mile. I can't just jump onto the bike path to get away from you. I don't want to hit you I just want to get where I'm going (just like you!!!!!!!). Simply put the amount of peds and bikes on places like Beach Drive ARE creating a safety hazard. Please exercise some common sense. This isn't Holland.

It’s not a hobby. It’s how I get around. It’s transportation.

Then get around on the f$cking bike path.

I sincerely hope the people telling bicyclists to get on a bike path are working really hard to get a connected and protected network of bike arterials throughout the city.

Trust me, if there was a better option we'd be on it. No one likes being around you when you're driving.

Total BS. I drive on Beach Drive and Rock Creek Parkway daily and there are multiple douchebags in their idiotic outfits who think they are just too special for the perfectly good bike path right next to it. I bike a lot as well and when I have to be on the road, and there are 10 cars respectfully trailing along behind me, I move to the side and let them pass. Why is this so difficult?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just wish that bikers wouldn’t roll past all the cars and go to the head of the line at red lights. We all just crossed over the double yellow to get around the cyclist, then the cyclist weaves past all of us at the light, and we have to pass him again.

This.

I’ve (and everyone else) have had to pass the same cyclist a half dozen times. We idle along behind them at 11 mph waiting for a chance to pass them safely. We do, and then when sitting at the next red light, the cyclist goes around all the cars waiting at the light, pedals through the red light, and everyone is back behind them again. Rinse and repeat. So 10-15 cars are all reduced to the speed of a single person on a bicycle, instead of doing the posted 30 mph speed limit.

If you can’t see why this would irritate people, then you are a sociopath.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are so angry. They slow everyone down by going up to 25 miles per hour under the speed limit.

So go around. What's the big deal?

Right, all 700 cars should have to take turns waiting and going around on a-hole who can't be bothered to take a bike path. All because he thinks he's a car.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just wish that bikers wouldn’t roll past all the cars and go to the head of the line at red lights. We all just crossed over the double yellow to get around the cyclist, then the cyclist weaves past all of us at the light, and we have to pass him again.

This.

I’ve (and everyone else) have had to pass the same cyclist a half dozen times. We idle along behind them at 11 mph waiting for a chance to pass them safely. We do, and then when sitting at the next red light, the cyclist goes around all the cars waiting at the light, pedals through the red light, and everyone is back behind them again. Rinse and repeat. So 10-15 cars are all reduced to the speed of a single person on a bicycle, instead of doing the posted 30 mph speed limit.

If you can’t see why this would irritate people, then you are a sociopath.

You aren't the brightest bulb on the string but that just makes you an average driver.

You realize that all that this means is that your angst about the passing the cyclist just means that he is travelling the same average speed as you?

If you didn't keep passing the cyclist only to race up to the next red light and sit there and instead traveled at the cyclists speed you would get there just as quickly, the cyclist would be safer (as would you and everyone else on the road) you would safe gas (and reduce your global warming footprint) and wear and tear on your car.

But hey your SUV is engineered to go fast so damn it you are going to gun it in between traffic queues and pass that cyclists.

Only to have him laugh at you as he putters past you 20 seconds later at the next light.

Relax - being uptight and acting entitled doesn't get you home any faster and when you post about it on here you just reveal how dumb you are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just wish that bikers wouldn’t roll past all the cars and go to the head of the line at red lights. We all just crossed over the double yellow to get around the cyclist, then the cyclist weaves past all of us at the light, and we have to pass him again.

This.

I’ve (and everyone else) have had to pass the same cyclist a half dozen times. We idle along behind them at 11 mph waiting for a chance to pass them safely. We do, and then when sitting at the next red light, the cyclist goes around all the cars waiting at the light, pedals through the red light, and everyone is back behind them again. Rinse and repeat. So 10-15 cars are all reduced to the speed of a single person on a bicycle, instead of doing the posted 30 mph speed limit.

If you can’t see why this would irritate people, then you are a sociopath.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you you think going to the front of the line in waiting traffic is a better idea? So even more people are stuck behind you again?

You should give that some more thought.

When I'm on a bike, I make the choices that increase my safety.

When I'm driving, I make the choices that protect bicyclists and other vulnerable road users (for example, pedestrians). Because I'm not a jerk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. The PP is explaining why people ride their bikes in the road.

Ok well I was just explaining why people drive their cars in the road. The sidewalk is off limits.

No one has suggested you drive your car anywhere other than the road. Straw man.

Anonymous wrote:So you you think going to the front of the line in waiting traffic is a better idea? So even more people are stuck behind you again?

You should give that some more thought.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just wish that bikers wouldn’t roll past all the cars and go to the head of the line at red lights. We all just crossed over the double yellow to get around the cyclist, then the cyclist weaves past all of us at the light, and we have to pass him again.

This.

I’ve (and everyone else) have had to pass the same cyclist a half dozen times. We idle along behind them at 11 mph waiting for a chance to pass them safely. We do, and then when sitting at the next red light, the cyclist goes around all the cars waiting at the light, pedals through the red light, and everyone is back behind them again. Rinse and repeat. So 10-15 cars are all reduced to the speed of a single person on a bicycle, instead of doing the posted 30 mph speed limit.

If you can’t see why this would irritate people, then you are a sociopath.