Anonymous wrote:No, not at all. Zero help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP’s kid’s looking only at top 25 schools simply because she’s looking for top 25 most eligible bachelors. Is that so wrong? If the poor bastard is number 26, just drop him. Go girl!
You are a sexist idiot, from another era, who belongs back there.
Can't imagine you would say this to a male with those credentials.
We have a long way to go as long as there are people like you in this world.
Everyone’s trying to figure out this OP. I’m doing my part to explain OP’s thinking. OP is probably thinking the kid can fall in love with top 25 just as well as she can with number 100. This is not my thinking. This is what OP thinks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP’s kid’s looking only at top 25 schools simply because she’s looking for top 25 most eligible bachelors. Is that so wrong? If the poor bastard is number 26, just drop him. Go girl!
You are a sexist idiot, from another era, who belongs back there.
Can't imagine you would say this to a male with those credentials.
We have a long way to go as long as there are people like you in this world.
Anonymous wrote:My DC had similar stats and excellent ec's but was not an athlete or URM or legacy. Guess what- he did not get into a "top" school. He is at a great state school and extremely happy and doing exceptionally well. Our experience is that if you have a top student, it is not so easy to get into Michigan or Emory because they think you will get in to a better school and go elsewhere. They all want a high yield. I would really think long and hard about making sure your child will be happy at every school on their list because they may end up at a school they never dreamed of attending. It is a total crapshoot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP’s kid’s looking only at top 25 schools simply because she’s looking for top 25 most eligible bachelors. Is that so wrong? If the poor bastard is number 26, just drop him. Go girl!
You are a sexist idiot, from another era, who belongs back there.
Anonymous wrote:OP’s kid’s looking only at top 25 schools simply because she’s looking for top 25 most eligible bachelors. Is that so wrong? If the poor bastard is number 26, just drop him. Go girl!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To clarify for everyone replying to the chat - DD has a 1560 SAT (800 verbal, 760 math) and 4.8 weighted GPA, and yes she is applying to all 25 top schools except UCLA, UCB, MIT, Caltech. ECs are nothing too noteworthy, but she is a prolific writer and has won many writing contests and has published poems for a close to mainstream publication. She plans on majoring in English.
What safety schools are on the list? A lot of kids have stats like your kids.
Like I was saying in the original post - we view Michigan, Emory, USC as the safe schools. The naviance data at our HS supports this.
Others on this thread are trying to tell you...take every kid with 1560 and higher, just in the US. That is over 100,000 kids. Add to it the varsity athletes, the theater award winners, the full pay legacies who are "good enough" and the economic and racial diversity with stories too good to pass up and you have well over 200,000 kids. Those 200,000 are vying for, call it, 25,000 slots. Add to it all the kids who have great stories or other hooks and you start to get to 500,000 kids. Now add the international students, who are full pay for the most part. All of the sudden, you can see where 4% of applicants gain admission to these top 25 schools, including Emory, USC and Michigan, that you seem to think are safeties.
The math just isn't with your kid...or ANY kid. Assume a 4% chance at ANY of these schools (maybe Michigan is a little higher just because they have a bigger Freshman class)
Find some actual safeties that your DD will be happy with.