Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am actually shocked at the number of no answers. I think people are either downplaying their activities, lying about what "seeing friends" means (i.e. it's not the same way they used to do it so the answer is no), or...I don't know. So many of my friends have kids who are actually going to school, whether in-person or hybrid, and while I don't think engaging in one risky activity justifies engaging in another, I just can't believe that there are so many whose kids aren't seeing others.
If your kids are not doing school in person, would you send them if (1) no one took buses or the buses were totally spaced out (like 1/4 the capacity) and everyone was masked, (2) the classrooms had a limited number of kids per room such that no desk was closer than 6 feet away from any other, (3) the school did testing two days before school and every two weeks once it started, plus random tests in addition to that, (4) there was lots of outdoor time and classes and lunches could be done outside, and (5) kids were grouped into cohorts so that they remained effectively isolated to the 15 or so kids plus teacher that was in their homeroom? If the answer would be yes, then why wouldn't you let your kids play outside with their friends more, especially if they were masked?
No to both, because our doctor told us not to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes! Masked, playing outside. Sheesh, what are we doing to our kids? Let them see their friends, it's been 6 months. Have them sanitize their hands before and after playing.
"Sanitize their hands?" Have you been asleep since April? The predominant transmission risk has nothing to do with their hands.
NP, yes, this is true AND the time "fomite" transmission does come into play is when they touch their faces or eat something right after. With younger kids, especially, there's risk of them touching their faces (eyes/nose/mouths) more and not thoroughly washing hands before eating with them, etc. In terms of sanitizing or thoroughly washing before play-- lots of kids might have just eaten something or picked their noses or whatever before leaving the house.
Sanitizing hands really couldn't hurt, and could help *in a global pandemic*.
Like... there's a difference between thinking you need to treat all of your groceries to a bleach bath (we now understand this is overkill) and making sure your young child's hands are very clean before/after a visit to a playground with friends.
Hey, that's all well and good. Sanitize their hands to your heart's content. Just don't try to convince yourself (or others) that their playdates are So Very Safe because your kid wears a thin, fallible mask and you erroneously believe they fully distance 100% of the time. Take the risks you want to take, but don't lie to yourself or others about it.
Anonymous wrote:Yes but outdoors only. Once Winter hits, they won’t be able to see their friends for a few months until spring. We will not allow indoor play/hanging out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course. We’re not loony martyrs
+1. Where are these people in real life? Driving alone in their cars and wearing masks and gloves?
Anonymous wrote:Of course. We’re not loony martyrs
Anonymous wrote:I am actually shocked at the number of no answers. I think people are either downplaying their activities, lying about what "seeing friends" means (i.e. it's not the same way they used to do it so the answer is no), or...I don't know. So many of my friends have kids who are actually going to school, whether in-person or hybrid, and while I don't think engaging in one risky activity justifies engaging in another, I just can't believe that there are so many whose kids aren't seeing others.
If your kids are not doing school in person, would you send them if (1) no one took buses or the buses were totally spaced out (like 1/4 the capacity) and everyone was masked, (2) the classrooms had a limited number of kids per room such that no desk was closer than 6 feet away from any other, (3) the school did testing two days before school and every two weeks once it started, plus random tests in addition to that, (4) there was lots of outdoor time and classes and lunches could be done outside, and (5) kids were grouped into cohorts so that they remained effectively isolated to the 15 or so kids plus teacher that was in their homeroom? If the answer would be yes, then why wouldn't you let your kids play outside with their friends more, especially if they were masked?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, kids need to play and socialise. All science speaks for this and against children suffering from Covid. Risk benefit analysis done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes! Masked, playing outside. Sheesh, what are we doing to our kids? Let them see their friends, it's been 6 months. Have them sanitize their hands before and after playing.
"Sanitize their hands?" Have you been asleep since April? The predominant transmission risk has nothing to do with their hands.
NP, yes, this is true AND the time "fomite" transmission does come into play is when they touch their faces or eat something right after. With younger kids, especially, there's risk of them touching their faces (eyes/nose/mouths) more and not thoroughly washing hands before eating with them, etc. In terms of sanitizing or thoroughly washing before play-- lots of kids might have just eaten something or picked their noses or whatever before leaving the house.
Sanitizing hands really couldn't hurt, and could help *in a global pandemic*.
Like... there's a difference between thinking you need to treat all of your groceries to a bleach bath (we now understand this is overkill) and making sure your young child's hands are very clean before/after a visit to a playground with friends.
Anonymous wrote: Nope.
Anonymous wrote:No. We’re in Los Angeles and our numbers are still way too high. Might be different in DC.
It’s hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course. We’re not loony martyrs
+1. Where are these people in real life? Driving alone in their cars and wearing masks and gloves?
Anonymous wrote:Of course. We’re not loony martyrs