Anonymous wrote:OK - here's what I would do if I was running the school.
a) If your kid tests positive....he/she must quarantine for 14 days AT HOME if within 3-4 hrs drive. All others must quarantine on campus, hotel, etc.
b) If your kid has Covid symptoms and tests positive...he/she MUST GO HOME for treatment at home.
ALL STUDENTS MUST BE DIRECTED TO GET TESTED -- ON THEIR OWN/PARENTS DIME!!
ALL STUDENTS CAUGHT VIOLATING COVID PROTOCOLS -- Suspended and Sent home! Violating COVID protocol should be treated same as violating the honor code/cheating on test.
Is this perfect? No....but this way...the students who test negative and follow protocol get to stay on campus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-30/colleges-with-covid-outbreaks-advised-to-keep-students-on-campus
They should keep students on campus and try to keep infection rate down; not send them home to infect the community
You remember back in late February when that one hospital in Italy discovered they had a couple cases, so they evacuated the entire hospital instead of locking it down? Remember how that literally destroyed their nation? That’s exactly what colleges are doing.
Yes, they are. But, what else are they supposed to do? Do they have the facilities, hospitals to take care of the students? No. Did they make any field hospitals? No. So, what? Lock them up and see who survives? Make two daily phone calls to quarantined ill students? Who can't tell if they have no oxygen? While all of us at home are mature adults and know to go to the hospital and we all know that young adults have very little common sense or a sense of how bad things are? When our kids might need to be in a hospital but are scared and told to stay in, lest they infect someone? Is that the price you are ok to pay? Young people die from it too. I am sure that without meds and care some of them need, many more will die than would happen otherwise.
I will be taking my kid home if she falls sick. How callous can you get?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech, GMU, William and Mary, VCU, UVA... all of these schools set up testing as a requirement. They all seems to be doing okay.
I was going to have my sophomore JMU student get tested before returning, and it looked like he need to have symptoms, underlying conditions or a known exposure in order to even qualify for a test, so I'll admit that we skipped it. Maybe I misunderstood how widely available testing is in Northern VA. I know that students at some schools received tests in the mail to self-administer - did any VA schools do that?
He's off campus and plans to stay. If I had a freshman at JMU or just about any campus this year, I don't think I would have moved them in and probably would have pushed a deferral.
For the record, he actually applied to the school - excellent faculty in his major (there were no other reasonable options for the major in VA and he wants to save $$$ for grad school).
This is what VCU did.
VCU, GMU and W&M all did pre-testing via self-administration (though there's some worry about that because it is self-administered and some critique that it's not appropriate). Looking at these school's stats they all have really low positives. I'm concerned the tests weren't sensitive enough but I'm not an expert.
My DC1 is at a SLAC where the nurse did the swab up the nose far enough to touch his brain. They administered about 2500 tests to faculty, staff and students and got 6 positives— .2% positivity. They are now doing asymptomatic surveillance testing and reported 600 tests with no cases. I think affluent white kids of the type that go to WM or a SLAC just aren’t in the communities being hardest hit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech, GMU, William and Mary, VCU, UVA... all of these schools set up testing as a requirement. They all seems to be doing okay.
I was going to have my sophomore JMU student get tested before returning, and it looked like he need to have symptoms, underlying conditions or a known exposure in order to even qualify for a test, so I'll admit that we skipped it. Maybe I misunderstood how widely available testing is in Northern VA. I know that students at some schools received tests in the mail to self-administer - did any VA schools do that?
He's off campus and plans to stay. If I had a freshman at JMU or just about any campus this year, I don't think I would have moved them in and probably would have pushed a deferral.
For the record, he actually applied to the school - excellent faculty in his major (there were no other reasonable options for the major in VA and he wants to save $$$ for grad school).
This is what VCU did.
VCU, GMU and W&M all did pre-testing via self-administration (though there's some worry about that because it is self-administered and some critique that it's not appropriate). Looking at these school's stats they all have really low positives. I'm concerned the tests weren't sensitive enough but I'm not an expert.
Anonymous wrote:UVA students received test kits in the mail prior to returning to grounds.
Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech, GMU, William and Mary, VCU, UVA... all of these schools set up testing as a requirement. They all seems to be doing okay.
I was going to have my sophomore JMU student get tested before returning, and it looked like he need to have symptoms, underlying conditions or a known exposure in order to even qualify for a test, so I'll admit that we skipped it. Maybe I misunderstood how widely available testing is in Northern VA. I know that students at some schools received tests in the mail to self-administer - did any VA schools do that?
He's off campus and plans to stay. If I had a freshman at JMU or just about any campus this year, I don't think I would have moved them in and probably would have pushed a deferral.
For the record, he actually applied to the school - excellent faculty in his major (there were no other reasonable options for the major in VA and he wants to save $$$ for grad school).
Anonymous wrote:
This is a mistake.
By the end of the month, cases will be trending downward at the open colleges and most will be in good shape by November
No matter what, colleges will have an uptick of cases when they open, it's inevitable.
Absolutely agree. Why is no one talking about this? Once a school gets this number of cases, the best thing to do is leave everyone there and let it run its course. In a month, they'll have herd immunity, no one will die or even get that sick, and they'll be back in class. Until then, just do online learning. Send kids with immune deficiency and who are obese home. By sending everyone home now, you're re-seeding the virus back in small communities. This is literally the worst thing you could do. We'll now have another "wave" in NOVA due to returning JMU kids, which actually *will* kill people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-30/colleges-with-covid-outbreaks-advised-to-keep-students-on-campus
They should keep students on campus and try to keep infection rate down; not send them home to infect the community
You remember back in late February when that one hospital in Italy discovered they had a couple cases, so they evacuated the entire hospital instead of locking it down? Remember how that literally destroyed their nation? That’s exactly what colleges are doing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech, GMU, William and Mary, VCU, UVA... all of these schools set up testing as a requirement. They all seems to be doing okay.
I was going to have my sophomore JMU student get tested before returning, and it looked like he need to have symptoms, underlying conditions or a known exposure in order to even qualify for a test, so I'll admit that we skipped it. Maybe I misunderstood how widely available testing is in Northern VA. I know that students at some schools received tests in the mail to self-administer - did any VA schools do that?
He's off campus and plans to stay. If I had a freshman at JMU or just about any campus this year, I don't think I would have moved them in and probably would have pushed a deferral.
For the record, he actually applied to the school - excellent faculty in his major (there were no other reasonable options for the major in VA and he wants to save $$$ for grad school).
This is what VCU did.
If you administer the test yourself you’re not going to put the stick as high in your nose than if someone else administered it; therefore, a lot of false negatives.
VCU, GMU and W&M all did pre-testing via self-administration (though there's some worry about that because it is self-administered and some critique that it's not appropriate). Looking at these school's stats they all have really low positives. I'm concerned the tests weren't sensitive enough but I'm not an expert.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech, GMU, William and Mary, VCU, UVA... all of these schools set up testing as a requirement. They all seems to be doing okay.
I was going to have my sophomore JMU student get tested before returning, and it looked like he need to have symptoms, underlying conditions or a known exposure in order to even qualify for a test, so I'll admit that we skipped it. Maybe I misunderstood how widely available testing is in Northern VA. I know that students at some schools received tests in the mail to self-administer - did any VA schools do that?
He's off campus and plans to stay. If I had a freshman at JMU or just about any campus this year, I don't think I would have moved them in and probably would have pushed a deferral.
For the record, he actually applied to the school - excellent faculty in his major (there were no other reasonable options for the major in VA and he wants to save $$$ for grad school).
This is what VCU did.
If you administer the test yourself you’re not going to put the stick as high in your nose than if someone else administered it; therefore, a lot of false negatives.
VCU, GMU and W&M all did pre-testing via self-administration (though there's some worry about that because it is self-administered and some critique that it's not appropriate). Looking at these school's stats they all have really low positives. I'm concerned the tests weren't sensitive enough but I'm not an expert.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-30/colleges-with-covid-outbreaks-advised-to-keep-students-on-campus
They should keep students on campus and try to keep infection rate down; not send them home to infect the community