Anonymous wrote:I’m 38 and have two kids ( an almost 3 year old and and an almost 1.5 year old). They are amazing! I’m a nurse and have been thinking of going back to school for my MSN for NP. It’s always something I wanted to do but I went to nursing school later in life ( finished at 35) and didn’t want to put off having kids. My husband and I are contemplating having a third. We will start trying at the end of the year if we decide to. We are not 100% sure we want a third as our boys are a handful and we are 38 and 42. My MSN will take 3 years ( PT) and I will be working PT too. We don’t need the extra money but there are many advantages to getting my masters. Would you have a third child first or get an advanced degree first?
Anonymous wrote:Go to grad school, a lot of advance nursing degrees are online anyhow.
If you want have the kid while in school. After school, your options are limitless.
Anonymous wrote:I’m 38 and have two kids ( an almost 3 year old and and an almost 1.5 year old). They are amazing! I’m a nurse and have been thinking of going back to school for my MSN for NP. It’s always something I wanted to do but I went to nursing school later in life ( finished at 35) and didn’t want to put off having kids. My husband and I are contemplating having a third. We will start trying at the end of the year if we decide to. We are not 100% sure we want a third as our boys are a handful and we are 38 and 42. My MSN will take 3 years ( PT) and I will be working PT too. We don’t need the extra money but there are many advantages to getting my masters. Would you have a third child first or get an advanced degree first?
Anonymous wrote:I recognize OP and her story; the late in life nurse, former nanny, with rich DH. Her DHs income always manages to come up in her "questions" or "problems" and they are usually non issues or ridiculous.
But anyhow, since you asked..
You already make a good amount of money as an RN and could make more. From a schedule stand point, you can find a job as an RN with 9-5 hrs or PRN hrs to fit your family's schedule. Being an NP isn't going to give you much of an income boost. NPs aren't exactly rolling in dough. I don't see it as something that will change your financial standing or quality of life at all. If you really want to pursue it, have the third child ASAP and do it once all three children are in school- or don't have the third child and still wait until youngest is in school. Don't use up your non-work hrs that you have with your little children now doing school work.
Anonymous wrote:I always think it’s a little odd when a couple with very mismatched salaries tries to give each career equal weight. It makes the lower earning spouse seem insecure and competitive.
You were a nanny and you married a high earning guy. So you went back to school and got an RN, and now you want to be an NP. Why? All through your twenties, your career wasn’t a priority. When you were dating, you weren’t super into your career. And now that you are 38 and you have all of these other responsibilities as wife and mother your career is suddenly important to you? What is that about?
Anonymous wrote:I’m 38 and have two kids ( an almost 3 year old and and an almost 1.5 year old). They are amazing! I’m a nurse and have been thinking of going back to school for my MSN for NP. It’s always something I wanted to do but I went to nursing school later in life ( finished at 35) and didn’t want to put off having kids. My husband and I are contemplating having a third. We will start trying at the end of the year if we decide to. We are not 100% sure we want a third as our boys are a handful and we are 38 and 42. My MSN will take 3 years ( PT) and I will be working PT too. We don’t need the extra money but there are many advantages to getting my masters. Would you have a third child first or get an advanced degree first?
Anonymous wrote:I find your perspective troubling. There’s nothing wrong with having money but have some perspective about your privilege. You sound really tone deaf. The median HHI in the US is 61k. Your family makes more than 7 times that! The top 1 percent of earners in the US make over 350K. That means your household, and yes, this makes you wealthy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. We don’t have separate finances but I like to be realistic that anything can happen and I will be the sole provider. I do not want to quit my job ( I did go PT for 1 year with each kid) because anything can happen and I want to be able to contribute financially. My husband is not comfortable with a SAHM and wants me to work.
Do you really want to go to school or is it your husband pushing you to go? He won’t let you be a SAHM? He sounds like a jerk. He makes more than enough to allow you to stay home. I wouldn’t quit my job because I can see divorce in your future.
She needs to make her own money. Of course he doesn't want her to be dependent on him.
Ok. But she really isn’t contributing much to their finances. She makes $80k/yr. He makes enough that everything she makes is taxed at 35%. Plus state and local taxes and social security. So she brings home maybe $45k/yr. And then she pays for childcare while she is working. Let’s say she only has her nanny part time and pays $20/hr for 25 hours/wk. That’s $500/wk x 52 weeks/yr = $26k/yr. So after taxes and childcare, she brings home roughly $1500/month. Meanwhile he brings home roughly $20-25k/month.
I just don’t see how it’s really even worth it for her to work. Particularly if she doesn’t like her job.
NP. This thread is odd. I make $30k/yr and DH makes $120k/yr. Is this a point of contention for couples ?!?
It would be for me.
I think it’s odd to expect your spouse to work full time if they want to be at home with the kids and it doesn’t make any difference to your finances.
Does your DH have a thing about you not being dependent on him too?
I think it's odd that you assume OP WANTS to be at home with the kids. She has a job that she wants to get an advanced degree in. Most people who don't want to work would take that path. So it sounds like she doesn't want to stay home with her kids. It's also not demonic that her husband doesn't want a SAHM. I know men like that and they're not jerks, they just don't like the SAH dynamic. I wouldn't want a SAHD, to be honest. It's one thing if you're talking when the kids are young, but she said she stayed home with each of them for the first year. There's more to working than the paycheck, which some people can't seem to comprehend.
I don’t know. If you don’t want to married to a SAHM, then don’t marry a nanny when you make $350k/yr.
PP here. Fair enough.
Although it's possible she was on the nursing by the time they got married.