Anonymous wrote:Most parents do NOT want schools to open. They are well aware of the risks! Many parents are voicing sadness and frustration that their children's lives are still upended for the upcoming school year, but it doesn't mean they WANT schools to reopen with the pandemic uncontrolled as it is.
Anonymous wrote:I do think you are onto something, OP. My husband normally works full time out of the house and he is loving working from home. When we talk about his office reopening at some point, we kind of dread it. And we've already agreed that if they try to reopen the office anytime soon, he will say he doesn't feel comfortable in an office with Covid still so prevalent and ask to continue at home. It is partly that fear (he would have to commute via public transportation and his office has an ancient and notoriously terrible HVAC system), but it's also a good excuse to just keep working at home, get to spend more time with our kid, and skip his awful commute.
Surely there are teachers in the same position. Like you, I don't fault them -- there is so much more flexibility to working from home, especially if you have kids or normally have a tough commute. I've worked from home for years and have always loved it.
Meanwhile, I think parents want schools open because they are struggling to handle childcare and work. Which is also understandable! I don't think parents want to put teachers (or themselves) at risk of Covid. I just think they are in a tough situation and engaging in some optimistic thinking about how in-person schooling would go.
I don't understand all the vitriol towards teachers who want to stay home or parents who want their kids in school. These seem like understandable positions to me. I mostly blame all the public officials who have botched the whole decision making process and also have done so little to control the virus, making everything harder than it should be. Everyone else is just trying their best.
Anonymous wrote:^^Umm... that WaPo poll had the plurality of parents supporting hybrid! So you are further proving, not refuting, OP’s point...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yeah, but the problem is that the old restaurant that gave us food poisoning still has our credit card and keeps charging us for meals that they don't even deliver any more! They just keep sending us hastily scribbled recipes and say it's our responsibility to cook for ourselves now.
I like this analogy,
I honestly think the teachers on here taking hard line stances are trolls or otherwise not serious. Any teacher, particularly of young elementary, who says with a straight face that they have a telework job is being obtuse.
Despite how much chaos it has caused for me, I do support schools being closed. Just don't gaslight me to tell me that this is an acceptable situation, rather than the best of all of the terrible options that exist right now.
Anonymous wrote:
Yeah, but the problem is that the old restaurant that gave us food poisoning still has our credit card and keeps charging us for meals that they don't even deliver any more! They just keep sending us hastily scribbled recipes and say it's our responsibility to cook for ourselves now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the teachers don't want to die while the parents just want childcare.
C'mon, man, read any of the 29034723 threads on this topic that exist already.
Plus a million. You’re an idiot, op.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You guys,
My boss expects me to drive to work. I don't want to die. What should I do? I don't want to die. It is not like I can take safety precautions like driving the speed limit, not driving distracted, wearing a seatbelt.
You see the rate of traffic fatalities. He is such a jerk expecting me to do the job I get paid to do.
Not my fault your job doesn’t allow you to telework.
Teachers can.
Buckle up and drive safe.
This is such a myth. DL is pretense for teachers. DL is not effective for the majority of students. If a restaurant cooks nothing but spoiled food, can they really still say they're "serving meals"?
We have had subpar take out since March. Everyone keeps saying that we need to continue to support local restaurants and should understand that there will be a difference from our prepandemic experience.
Find new restaurants- I've had many good meals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You guys,
My boss expects me to drive to work. I don't want to die. What should I do? I don't want to die. It is not like I can take safety precautions like driving the speed limit, not driving distracted, wearing a seatbelt.
You see the rate of traffic fatalities. He is such a jerk expecting me to do the job I get paid to do.
Not my fault your job doesn’t allow you to telework.
Teachers can.
Buckle up and drive safe.
But it's not safe- have you been out there lately? People have been driving like maniacs. Maybe I should advocate for my employer to allow telework, even though I can only be about 50% effective at home. That's cool, right?
Nothing wrong with advocating for yourself.
Good luck.
But you'd be cool with me only performing 50% of my cybersecurity job from home, right? What could go wrong?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You guys,
My boss expects me to drive to work. I don't want to die. What should I do? I don't want to die. It is not like I can take safety precautions like driving the speed limit, not driving distracted, wearing a seatbelt.
You see the rate of traffic fatalities. He is such a jerk expecting me to do the job I get paid to do.
Not my fault your job doesn’t allow you to telework.
Teachers can.
Buckle up and drive safe.
This is such a myth. DL is pretense for teachers. DL is not effective for the majority of students. If a restaurant cooks nothing but spoiled food, can they really still say they're "serving meals"?
We have had subpar take out since March. Everyone keeps saying that we need to continue to support local restaurants and should understand that there will be a difference from our prepandemic experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You guys,
My boss expects me to drive to work. I don't want to die. What should I do? I don't want to die. It is not like I can take safety precautions like driving the speed limit, not driving distracted, wearing a seatbelt.
You see the rate of traffic fatalities. He is such a jerk expecting me to do the job I get paid to do.
Not my fault your job doesn’t allow you to telework.
Teachers can.
Buckle up and drive safe.
But it's not safe- have you been out there lately? People have been driving like maniacs. Maybe I should advocate for my employer to allow telework, even though I can only be about 50% effective at home. That's cool, right?
Nothing wrong with advocating for yourself.
Good luck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You guys,
My boss expects me to drive to work. I don't want to die. What should I do? I don't want to die. It is not like I can take safety precautions like driving the speed limit, not driving distracted, wearing a seatbelt.
You see the rate of traffic fatalities. He is such a jerk expecting me to do the job I get paid to do.
Not my fault your job doesn’t allow you to telework.
Teachers can.
Buckle up and drive safe.
This is such a myth. DL is pretense for teachers. DL is not effective for the majority of students. If a restaurant cooks nothing but spoiled food, can they really still say they're "serving meals"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So just a question- why is 1 or 2 cases per 100k acceptable to you? Not arguing with your post really, and I guess that number is not all that different than what Gayles came up with, but he pointed to cdc guidance that does not really exist. Other states like NY have set different metrics. It frustrates me that there’s isn’t a credible, national effort.
I got the number by reading news reports of countries in Europe and Asia that successfully reopened schools in the spring. They would close a school if even one case was found in the school. I looked at the European CDC data on spread in those countries that seemed to be able to keep schools open, with a few having to close when there was a case, and their community spread was listed at 1 new case per 100,000 per day or less (I think they measured 10 new cases per 1 million but it's the same thing.)
So that's just the number I was thinking of, but I found that experts think the same thing. It's the level considered to be the "green" zone by experts at the Harvard Global Health Institute:
https://globalepidemics.org/key-metrics-for-covid-suppression/
![]()
It's the level the CDC has designated as "minimal community spread".
It's the level Dr Osterholm (director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota) has chosen as the level of spread at which we could safely reopen things:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/07/opinion/coronavirus-lockdown-unemployment-death.html
We believe the choice is clear. We can continue to allow the coronavirus to spread rapidly throughout the country or we can commit to a more restrictive lockdown, state by state, for up to six weeks to crush the spread of the virus to less than one new case per 100,000 people per day.
That’s the point at which we will be able to limit the increase in new cases through aggressive public health measures, just as other countries have done. But we’re a long way from there right now.