Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many colleges are exclusively online?
I may have some school’s plans wrong. I’m not looking up every plan and plans are evolving. Bit I’ve been following because I have a college freshman.
Lots of Big State Us are teaching 100% online, but inviting some or all student back to campus. I think Michigan just announced this.
Many state Us are putting large electives on line, but having recitations in person. Purdue is doing this.
Many State Us are only letting limited students who must do hands on meet in person— sciences labs and hands on fine arts. If you major in politics, you will likely be entirely online in these schools. But many of the students at these school can live online. can live on campus.
At the flagship school for RI, you only get housing if you are OOS. In state is on their own for housing. Mix of on online and in person.
Harvard is letting freshmen come on campus in the fall and Seniors in the spring, but all classes on line. I think Princeton is also all online, tuition discount given. Yale is looking at getting everyone on in person.
Last I saw, UCs are moving to all classes online except specialties like nursing practicals and some senior lab students. The parallel CA State U system is online, most kids not welcome to live on campus.
SLACs are trying hard to get kids back and in live classes, but getting creative to get kids into single room and planning to test aggressively.. But some are only inviting a limited number of kids back (e.g. freshmen, seniors and lab sciences). Some are only inviting one class of kids at a time for short periods, like Grinnell. Some, like Oberlin, are moving to a trimester system (Freshmen and seniors in fall and spring. Sophomores in fall And summer. Juniors in spring and summer), single rooms, lots of testing and 90% of classes in person or hybrid.
Since SLACs are such a small percent of students, most students will learn 100% online, even if they live on campus. Some will get a class or two in person. A few— mostly in SLACs, are scheduled to get at least one semester with the majority of teaching online. But that could change at anytime, as it did in the spring. What then, deport students partway through.
It runs the gamit. And colleges in FL, AZ, etc may be saying everyone can come back, but that may not be realistic.
But what happen if and when a student who finds a college with in person classes has to go online because COVID spikes? The kid gets deported mid semester?
Anonymous wrote:How many colleges are exclusively online?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have they provided *any* rationale for this, other than just being dickwipes?
Nope! Dickwipes indeed!
Isn't the rationale that this was essentially a pre-existing rule? That is, you can't get a visa to go to an online school. This is consistent with that approach but it is applying to high profile "good" schools, not the existing on-line only schools.
Doesn't make it any better, of course, but that seems to be the reasoning. Treat Harvard like U Phoenix.
And I don't think the quote above applies to hybrid schools that then shut down because of COVID. There, the student has the VISA and is properly enrolled then all shifts online. I don't think there is any guidance there, which is a big problem for those trying to make plans.
TO be clear, I think this sucks but I see the thought process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, we now think it’s a good idea to force a few hundred thousand international students who are now in the US, a current covid hot spot, onto airplanes to scatter their germs around the world?
There may not even be flights to their home countries. What do they do then?
DP. Eventually we'll see some of those students end up arrested by ICE and put into detention facilities where there is spread of the virus. Like the many other immigrants in those facilities whose plight we seem no longer to recognize. I can only pray that their stories get out and are highly publicized everywhere.
+1. Those students who can’t be immediately deported to their home countries will be detained indefinitely by ICE. The virus will continue to spread in those detention facilities, and some students will die. It is inevitable.
If you support this policy, you also support the utterly avoidable deaths of those students. You can’t separate the two.
Oh sweet Jesus. Stop your overdramatic speculation. They are not going to detain, jail, and mark for death all students who have no flights available as a first line response. There are flights out of the country.
DP. There are flights out but do they go to every country? No. So people sit in detention.
It is not "overdramatic" to understand that if ICE is issuing a policy that students will be removed unless they remove themselves, those students will also be subject to arrest and detention and deportation. It's not dramatic to know that detention of any kind is a perfect environment for spreading any illness, especially a highly contagious one that we now know spreads through the air. You understand the workings of neither ICE nor viruses.
I suspect you think that detention and deportation are only for the lowest of the low, impoverished, illegal border-crossers. Because they deserve it, right?
Nope, detention is an equal opportunity problem. Students can and probably will end up there and end up sick.
Does everyone need a direct flight? There may not be a flight directly from JFK to everywhere, but the student can catch a connecting flight. You are making a lot of unnecessary assumptions about me that actually just make a statement about you, seeing as how I shared no information about myself or my beliefs. I fully support international students, but if they must leave, I believe they will be able to do so safely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, we now think it’s a good idea to force a few hundred thousand international students who are now in the US, a current covid hot spot, onto airplanes to scatter their germs around the world?
There may not even be flights to their home countries. What do they do then?
DP. Eventually we'll see some of those students end up arrested by ICE and put into detention facilities where there is spread of the virus. Like the many other immigrants in those facilities whose plight we seem no longer to recognize. I can only pray that their stories get out and are highly publicized everywhere.
+1. Those students who can’t be immediately deported to their home countries will be detained indefinitely by ICE. The virus will continue to spread in those detention facilities, and some students will die. It is inevitable.
If you support this policy, you also support the utterly avoidable deaths of those students. You can’t separate the two.
Oh sweet Jesus. Stop your overdramatic speculation. They are not going to detain, jail, and mark for death all students who have no flights available as a first line response. There are flights out of the country.
DP. There are flights out but do they go to every country? No. So people sit in detention.
It is not "overdramatic" to understand that if ICE is issuing a policy that students will be removed unless they remove themselves, those students will also be subject to arrest and detention and deportation. It's not dramatic to know that detention of any kind is a perfect environment for spreading any illness, especially a highly contagious one that we now know spreads through the air. You understand the workings of neither ICE nor viruses.
I suspect you think that detention and deportation are only for the lowest of the low, impoverished, illegal border-crossers. Because they deserve it, right?
Nope, detention is an equal opportunity problem. Students can and probably will end up there and end up sick.
Does everyone need a direct flight? There may not be a flight directly from JFK to everywhere, but the student can catch a connecting flight. You are making a lot of unnecessary assumptions about me that actually just make a statement about you, seeing as how I shared no information about myself or my beliefs. I fully support international students, but if they must leave, I believe they will be able to do so safely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have they provided *any* rationale for this, other than just being dickwipes?
Yes -- the whole point of the F-1 visa is to come to the US to study in a university. If you can no longer study _in_ the university, then there is no need to come to the US.
This is about students who are already here. They are being asked to leave in the midst of a pandemic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, we now think it’s a good idea to force a few hundred thousand international students who are now in the US, a current covid hot spot, onto airplanes to scatter their germs around the world?
There may not even be flights to their home countries. What do they do then?
DP. Eventually we'll see some of those students end up arrested by ICE and put into detention facilities where there is spread of the virus. Like the many other immigrants in those facilities whose plight we seem no longer to recognize. I can only pray that their stories get out and are highly publicized everywhere.
+1. Those students who can’t be immediately deported to their home countries will be detained indefinitely by ICE. The virus will continue to spread in those detention facilities, and some students will die. It is inevitable.
If you support this policy, you also support the utterly avoidable deaths of those students. You can’t separate the two.
Oh sweet Jesus. Stop your overdramatic speculation. They are not going to detain, jail, and mark for death all students who have no flights available as a first line response. There are flights out of the country.
DP. There are flights out but do they go to every country? No. So people sit in detention.
It is not "overdramatic" to understand that if ICE is issuing a policy that students will be removed unless they remove themselves, those students will also be subject to arrest and detention and deportation. It's not dramatic to know that detention of any kind is a perfect environment for spreading any illness, especially a highly contagious one that we now know spreads through the air. You understand the workings of neither ICE nor viruses.
I suspect you think that detention and deportation are only for the lowest of the low, impoverished, illegal border-crossers. Because they deserve it, right?
Nope, detention is an equal opportunity problem. Students can and probably will end up there and end up sick.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, we now think it’s a good idea to force a few hundred thousand international students who are now in the US, a current covid hot spot, onto airplanes to scatter their germs around the world?
There may not even be flights to their home countries. What do they do then?
DP. Eventually we'll see some of those students end up arrested by ICE and put into detention facilities where there is spread of the virus. Like the many other immigrants in those facilities whose plight we seem no longer to recognize. I can only pray that their stories get out and are highly publicized everywhere.
+1. Those students who can’t be immediately deported to their home countries will be detained indefinitely by ICE. The virus will continue to spread in those detention facilities, and some students will die. It is inevitable.
If you support this policy, you also support the utterly avoidable deaths of those students. You can’t separate the two.
Oh sweet Jesus. Stop your overdramatic speculation. They are not going to detain, jail, and mark for death all students who have no flights available as a first line response. There are flights out of the country.
Anonymous wrote:The Trumpers on this thread remind me of the types who think UVa should be almost all instate kids. Those dummies fail to realize that if that happens, it won’t be nearly as coveted a University.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, we now think it’s a good idea to force a few hundred thousand international students who are now in the US, a current covid hot spot, onto airplanes to scatter their germs around the world?
There may not even be flights to their home countries. What do they do then?
DP. Eventually we'll see some of those students end up arrested by ICE and put into detention facilities where there is spread of the virus. Like the many other immigrants in those facilities whose plight we seem no longer to recognize. I can only pray that their stories get out and are highly publicized everywhere.
+1. Those students who can’t be immediately deported to their home countries will be detained indefinitely by ICE. The virus will continue to spread in those detention facilities, and some students will die. It is inevitable.
If you support this policy, you also support the utterly avoidable deaths of those students. You can’t separate the two.
Oh sweet Jesus. Stop your overdramatic speculation. They are not going to detain, jail, and mark for death all students who have no flights available as a first line response. There are flights out of the country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of internationals are “full pay” and SLACs, in particular, rely on that $. We all saw this coming. Are you living under a rock? Our American rising seniors will not have to compete with that sector, but many SLACs may go under.
That so many international students are full pay means they'll have no problem with access to internet or computers in their home county. These are not impoverished students living in a shack without running water.
Universities have already been planning for a steep drop in enrollment. US-based students are taking gap years or going to community college so they don't have to pay the high fees for a distance-learning only environment.
Just because someone is full pay doesn't mean they have access to the internet from their home country. You realize, someone could be a coal heir in West Virginia and not have internet access at home, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have they provided *any* rationale for this, other than just being dickwipes?
Nope! Dickwipes indeed!
Isn't the rationale that this was essentially a pre-existing rule? That is, you can't get a visa to go to an online school. This is consistent with that approach but it is applying to high profile "good" schools, not the existing on-line only schools.
Doesn't make it any better, of course, but that seems to be the reasoning. Treat Harvard like U Phoenix.
And I don't think the quote above applies to hybrid schools that then shut down because of COVID. There, the student has the VISA and is properly enrolled then all shifts online. I don't think there is any guidance there, which is a big problem for those trying to make plans.
TO be clear, I think this sucks but I see the thought process.
But Harvard is Phoenix U. And forcing colleges to open up when they don’t they can do so safely during a once in a century pandemic to offer something in person for foreign kids is ridiculous. Normal people see that colleges are pushing to get back to in person as fast as possible. But in some places, at some schools, it’s not possible to do this safely.
You clearly have a gripe against brilliant (way more prepared than US kids) international students.