Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So we incentivize people not to work hard and rather just to be lazy and crap out more kids they can't afford. Great.
+1000. If the culture in these families is not to work and save, then the moment they can get their hands on the money most will blow it on short-term gratification.
African Americans have been “working hard” while being hated and abused for over 400 years! If anyone in the States deserves additional support it’s AAs.
All these people spewing hate and ignorance wouldn’t last a month living as an AA, before wanting to end it all!
ITA on the additional support. I’ve said above I’d be willing to pay $800b for lasting policies, ten times the $80b you’re talking about for reparations.
I just don’t agree that cash handouts are the way to do it. Cash handouts aren’t going to address all the systemic problems like poor education opportunities, prison reform, discrimination, bad health care, and the rest. Cash handouts aren’t going to help everybody move to good school districts—they’re going to raise house prices in the better school districts out of reach, and they won’t support a 30-year mortgage there anyway. At the end of the day, the next generation will still be stuck with bad school districts and bad healthcare.
Several people have raised these points, in various ways. You need to stop talking about “400 years” and start addressing all the concerns about implementation and lasting systemic change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a physician and would have blown this entire account on partying in college.
Ok. But how do you think your Medicaid patients would have spent it?
I work in Medicaid case management and love my patients and my job. I spend my days connecting people with resources (which are many in this city including free childcare for everyone under a certain income).
But 95% of them would blow through a 50K one time payment within a few months.
5-10% would probably use it for long term goals and/or education.
I honestly think this would be worth it---we could change the trajectory of 5-10% at the cost of losing 90% of the money.
I think the idea is that you get it when you are born, but don’t have access to it for twenty years. I think less people would blow through it if they had time to think about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So we incentivize people not to work hard and rather just to be lazy and crap out more kids they can't afford. Great.
+1000. If the culture in these families is not to work and save, then the moment they can get their hands on the money most will blow it on short-term gratification.
African Americans have been “working hard” while being hated and abused for over 400 years! If anyone in the States deserves additional support it’s AAs.
All these people spewing hate and ignorance wouldn’t last a month living as an AA, before wanting to end it all!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a physician and would have blown this entire account on partying in college.
Ok. But how do you think your Medicaid patients would have spent it?
I work in Medicaid case management and love my patients and my job. I spend my days connecting people with resources (which are many in this city including free childcare for everyone under a certain income).
But 95% of them would blow through a 50K one time payment within a few months.
5-10% would probably use it for long term goals and/or education.
I honestly think this would be worth it---we could change the trajectory of 5-10% at the cost of losing 90% of the money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So we incentivize people not to work hard and rather just to be lazy and crap out more kids they can't afford. Great.
+1000. If the culture in these families is not to work and save, then the moment they can get their hands on the money most will blow it on short-term gratification.
African Americans have been “working hard” while being hated and abused for over 400 years! If anyone in the States deserves additional support it’s AAs.
All these people spewing hate and ignorance wouldn’t last a month living as an AA, before wanting to end it all!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazing how people don't want to give $50K to poor people because they're afraid they'll act irresponsibly, but have no problem giving billion dollar bailouts to corporations who have a proven track record of behaving irresponsibly.
huh. has one person on here said they're in favor of bailing out corporations with billions? I must have missed that.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So we incentivize people not to work hard and rather just to be lazy and crap out more kids they can't afford. Great.
+1000. If the culture in these families is not to work and save, then the moment they can get their hands on the money most will blow it on short-term gratification.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazing how people don't want to give $50K to poor people because they're afraid they'll act irresponsibly, but have no problem giving billion dollar bailouts to corporations who have a proven track record of behaving irresponsibly.
huh. has one person on here said they're in favor of bailing out corporations with billions? I must have missed that.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazing how people don't want to give $50K to poor people because they're afraid they'll act irresponsibly, but have no problem giving billion dollar bailouts to corporations who have a proven track record of behaving irresponsibly.
Bingo.
Because these companies employ tens of thousands, and support entire network of supply chains and consulting companies that employ tens of thousands more people. That's why.
It's not bailing out the companies so that the CEO can buy a new Cadillac.
Anonymous wrote:Amazing how people don't want to give $50K to poor people because they're afraid they'll act irresponsibly, but have no problem giving billion dollar bailouts to corporations who have a proven track record of behaving irresponsibly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazing how people don't want to give $50K to poor people because they're afraid they'll act irresponsibly, but have no problem giving billion dollar bailouts to corporations who have a proven track record of behaving irresponsibly.
Bingo.
Because these companies employ tens of thousands, and support entire network of supply chains and consulting companies that employ tens of thousands more people. That's why.
It's not bailing out the companies so that the CEO can buy a new Cadillac.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazing how people don't want to give $50K to poor people because they're afraid they'll act irresponsibly, but have no problem giving billion dollar bailouts to corporations who have a proven track record of behaving irresponsibly.
Bingo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Or we could have free quality childcare for the under 5 set. Classes with 20 kids max for everyone with reading and math support. Pretty much scaffold and I do as many community issues (if they exist) as we can and lift all those kids up and up and give them portions beyond getting pregnant at 16 etc. and yes tracking. Talented people are needed for all sorts of trades and jobs that don't need college but can lead to a successful life and independence from the govt. Teach budgeting and proper shop and intro to nursing along with college prep.
This is basically the “Nordic Model.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So we incentivize people not to work hard and rather just to be lazy and crap out more kids they can't afford. Great.
+1000. If the culture in these families is not to work and save, then the moment they can get their hands on the money most will blow it on short-term gratification.
Anonymous wrote:So we incentivize people not to work hard and rather just to be lazy and crap out more kids they can't afford. Great.