Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course school is childcare. Suggesting otherwise is ridiculous.
No. School serves as childcare for a lot of families (including mine, back when my kids needed supervision), but that is a lucky accident. It happens to be the case that for most kids, education works better when kids are in school away from home, being educated by professionals, without the parents around. That frees parents to do whatever they want with their time during school hours.
But there are times when school can't safely open, because of power outages or snowstorms or pandemics. And in those cases, the school system is not obligated to figure out your childcare for you.
If your kid attends, say, therapy once a week, and the therapist says you should leave for the duration so you usually run errands or get a pedicure, that doesn't mean the therapist has to find you a sitter on weeks when there's no therapy. Having someone else supervise your kid for that hour is a thing that happens because of therapy, not the purpose of therapy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course school is childcare. Suggesting otherwise is ridiculous.
No. School serves as childcare for a lot of families (including mine, back when my kids needed supervision), but that is a lucky accident. It happens to be the case that for most kids, education works better when kids are in school away from home, being educated by professionals, without the parents around. That frees parents to do whatever they want with their time during school hours.
But there are times when school can't safely open, because of power outages or snowstorms or pandemics. And in those cases, the school system is not obligated to figure out your childcare for you.
If your kid attends, say, therapy once a week, and the therapist says you should leave for the duration so you usually run errands or get a pedicure, that doesn't mean the therapist has to find you a sitter on weeks when there's no therapy. Having someone else supervise your kid for that hour is a thing that happens because of therapy, not the purpose of therapy. [/quote
This is the best explanation I've read on this thread. Agree 100%.
Anonymous wrote:Of course school is childcare. Suggesting otherwise is ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers aren't nannies and schools aren't daycares, but millions of working parents structured their work and family planning and lots of other aspects of their lives around the fact that we have mandatory education and that children go to school during the day. And they aren't calling for the schools to reopen because they hate their kids, or because they see teachers as nannies, but because they work to pay their bills and they are worried about being able to keep the jobs that feed and house and clothe their children.
And none of this has anything to do with OP's situation anyway.
Thank you. The whole discussion is madness.
Here’s the crux of it for me: do you think teachers should have to bear the health risks of being around large groups of children if it means getting the rest of society back to work?
Anonymous wrote:Here’s what I think people are really saying with “school is not childcare”:
I as a teacher should not be forced into a dangerous environment just because you have to go to work, when we can still accomplish learning online instead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers aren't nannies and schools aren't daycares, but millions of working parents structured their work and family planning and lots of other aspects of their lives around the fact that we have mandatory education and that children go to school during the day. And they aren't calling for the schools to reopen because they hate their kids, or because they see teachers as nannies, but because they work to pay their bills and they are worried about being able to keep the jobs that feed and house and clothe their children.
And none of this has anything to do with OP's situation anyway.
No, it's because people live beyond their means in this country.
Anonymous wrote:Op here.
I guess I owe my sister an apology.
Our society is constructed that way.
I was just offended that I'm a good enough free babysitter but I'm somehow not a good enough teacher even though I am the one with them ALL day (she is working from home so could have them but doesn't) and AM teaching them everything right now. My kids are not less educated than her kids but that is the implication. Bill completely said today when I dropped them off (I also often pick up and drop off because my kids are old enough to be at home by themselves for the few minutes), that now they needed to read and get in some education as if I'm not working with them all day. It was unnecessarily mean.
And I'm jealous that my parents are now stepping in to help her at her demand for FREE as well even though they never helped me, exposing themselves to almost certain death at this rate or at least a real risk.
So she basically doesn't have to pay a penny and does whatever she wants and insults people who take care of their own children.
And I'm just mostly stressed and tired and sensitive so I'm sure I was snippy but who makes their husband write their sister an email instead of talking to me herself?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:School is, of course, childcare, and our entire economy is built around that assumption. I have no idea why DCUM is obsessed with this fiction.
EXACTLY. Of course one of the functions that school serves is to take care of children. I, too, think DCUM is weirdly obsessed with thinking this isn't the case and there is something wrong with a parent who took a job assuming their kids would be in school during certain hours M-F.
Schools do not exist to be childcare. It is a fact. Insisting that schools start up again to be childcare is outrageously selfish and entitled.
I do not personally need schools for childcare because I’m rich. But I can look around and see we as a society need school as childcare.
Childcare and schools should be distinct from one another. Just because school conveniently coincides with many working hours does not make it child care.
It’s like blurring the line between patient and customer in a physicians office. If you’re a customer, then you decide what prescriptions a doctor writes for you. If you’re a patient, you collaborate with the doc, who doesn’t just write you scripts as you demand.
You are splitting hairs and you know it.
I am not splitting hairs. The way you perceive the relationship has a big effect on the relationship.
Anonymous wrote:Op here.
I guess I owe my sister an apology.
Our society is constructed that way.
I was just offended that I'm a good enough free babysitter but I'm somehow not a good enough teacher even though I am the one with them ALL day (she is working from home so could have them but doesn't) and AM teaching them everything right now. My kids are not less educated than her kids but that is the implication. Bill completely said today when I dropped them off (I also often pick up and drop off because my kids are old enough to be at home by themselves for the few minutes), that now they needed to read and get in some education as if I'm not working with them all day. It was unnecessarily mean.
And I'm jealous that my parents are now stepping in to help her at her demand for FREE as well even though they never helped me, exposing themselves to almost certain death at this rate or at least a real risk.
So she basically doesn't have to pay a penny and does whatever she wants and insults people who take care of their own children.
And I'm just mostly stressed and tired and sensitive so I'm sure I was snippy but who makes their husband write their sister an email instead of talking to me herself?