Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is a disgrace. All the models have been completely wrong. To call them "science" is laughable. They are nothing more than spitballs. To blow up families' livelihoods over these guesses is shameful. We need to get back to work.
Disgrace! You know whose favorite word that is!
I'm no Trumper. I went door to door for Obama endlessly thanks. Calling anyone a Trumper who has a different take on information is not helpful to our society right now. It is disgraceful to destroy livelihoods based on numbers that are just totally random guesses (the "models"). If you owned a restaurant, your family would be losing everything right now. I don't own a restaurant, but I'm a compassionate person capable of empathy, unlike you, I guess.
You can't possibly not understand that the models and the blowing up families livelihoods are the REASON the curve looks the way it does now, right? The models weren't wrong, they got us to do what we needed to do to arrive at the model we're in now, which is flatter, but still not flat enough.
We are close.
Yes, I agree. We should continue waiting two weeks until all that is left of our society is charred rubble. I'm sure you are a government employee enjoying the downtime. For others, this is a terrifying end to their families livlihoods.
“Don’t speculate what I am!” [Stamps foot.] “But I can speculate what YOU are!”
Hypocrite.
Np. I'd like to see what your opinion would be if you were one of those whose livelihood has been affected. Dh and I have both had pay cuts and he's an essential worker who still has to risk his (and our family's) health every day. Assuming the pay cuts are the worst financial blow and we don't get sick, we can continue to pay our bills for maybe 6 months. There is no way we can do this much longer.
It's not like the choice is between social distancing and a robust economy. If we "open up" too early, the drastic increase in illness and deaths will have an even WORSE effect on the economy. And consumers aren't going to go out to spend money at restaurants/bowling alleys if they don't have confidence in our public health systems -- that means a strong national testing/tracing infrastructure, hospitals with the capacity to treat all the patients as necessary, and data that shows a sustained decline in spread. We don't have any of those yet. Focus your energy on getting that in place, if you really want to speed things up.
So there *is* currently no option that allows us to restart the economy. Anyone telling you different is lying.
You don't know anything more than anyone else, including the government and the "experts". I have been 2 weeked to death.
Right - no one knows. This is a brand new virus. We have no previous data. So models and predictions are going to change as we get more data. Of COURSE we're being "two weeked". That's how it's supposed to work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the emphasis has been only on testing people showing symptoms. We need to start testing everybody, and it's up to Bowser to make that happen. If she can make a big push to make sure everyone votes absentee in the primary this year -- I just got my ballot in the mail yesterday -- she can come up with a system in which more people get tested. Go door to door. Create some sort of social-media campaign advertising all the free testing sites. Assign people a day and tell them to go then. Something, anything other than "stay home and hope for the best," which seems to be her plan now.
Bowser is a clown and a lightweight but I really don't see how this is any of her fault. We don't have any senators or congressmen to grease the wheels, governors are more powerful and more savvy than our mayors, and DC got shafted like it always does in the coronavirus stimulus spending for states.
The testing issue is really dependent on a functioning federal government (i.e. White House) that really cares about a massive rollout and increase in testing to get accomplished. Of course the White House is interfering with this at every opportunity so no surprise it isn't happening.
Anonymous wrote:
We would be so much better if DC just rejoined Maryland or at least followed everything Gov Hogan does. Bowser is a bozo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the emphasis has been only on testing people showing symptoms. We need to start testing everybody, and it's up to Bowser to make that happen. If she can make a big push to make sure everyone votes absentee in the primary this year -- I just got my ballot in the mail yesterday -- she can come up with a system in which more people get tested. Go door to door. Create some sort of social-media campaign advertising all the free testing sites. Assign people a day and tell them to go then. Something, anything other than "stay home and hope for the best," which seems to be her plan now.
Bowser is a clown and a lightweight but I really don't see how this is any of her fault. We don't have any senators or congressmen to grease the wheels, governors are more powerful and more savvy than our mayors, and DC got shafted like it always does in the coronavirus stimulus spending for states.
The testing issue is really dependent on a functioning federal government (i.e. White House) that really cares about a massive rollout and increase in testing to get accomplished. Of course the White House is interfering with this at every opportunity so no surprise it isn't happening.
Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous
I would not be surprised to see stay at home enacted for the rest of the summer. We're still expecting the peak in early June and based on being out and about on 14th St today, the spine of the DC's #1 hotspot, no one is taking this seriously. Proper mask usage by 30% of the people on the street.
Anonymous wrote:
Why do we need to test? Almost all of us will catch the virus.
Anonymous wrote:Because the emphasis has been only on testing people showing symptoms. We need to start testing everybody, and it's up to Bowser to make that happen. If she can make a big push to make sure everyone votes absentee in the primary this year -- I just got my ballot in the mail yesterday -- she can come up with a system in which more people get tested. Go door to door. Create some sort of social-media campaign advertising all the free testing sites. Assign people a day and tell them to go then. Something, anything other than "stay home and hope for the best," which seems to be her plan now.
Anonymous wrote:So do we think the order is going to be extended past May 15th or not?
Anonymous wrote:Quotes below indicate that UDC alone has the ability to process 500 tests a day. How is it possible that this city is only processing 500 to 700 a day?
Both Nadeau and Ward 4 Councilmember Brandon Todd, who represents 16th Street Heights, say it’s still too early to reopen the city fully and ease social-distancing guidance, given the current prevalence of COVID-19. Todd notes that the District is increasing its free testing capacity, which could help officials get a better handle on the scale of the outbreak.
“We have a testing site just at the line of Ward 4 at [UDC’s] Bertie Backus [campus] and they have the ability to test up to 500 people a day,” he says.
Anonymous wrote:Quotes below indicate that UDC alone has the ability to process 500 tests a day. How is it possible that this city is only processing 500 to 700 a day?
Both Nadeau and Ward 4 Councilmember Brandon Todd, who represents 16th Street Heights, say it’s still too early to reopen the city fully and ease social-distancing guidance, given the current prevalence of COVID-19. Todd notes that the District is increasing its free testing capacity, which could help officials get a better handle on the scale of the outbreak.
“We have a testing site just at the line of Ward 4 at [UDC’s] Bertie Backus [campus] and they have the ability to test up to 500 people a day,” he says.
Both Nadeau and Ward 4 Councilmember Brandon Todd, who represents 16th Street Heights, say it’s still too early to reopen the city fully and ease social-distancing guidance, given the current prevalence of COVID-19. Todd notes that the District is increasing its free testing capacity, which could help officials get a better handle on the scale of the outbreak.
“We have a testing site just at the line of Ward 4 at [UDC’s] Bertie Backus [campus] and they have the ability to test up to 500 people a day,” he says.