Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read all posts, very helpful discussion. So the argument is basically about the money, right? If money is not an issue, people will always choose CMU, am I right?
The cost savings is one factor. Another is this: do you want your kid to have a normal college experience? If so, choose UVA.
So you define a "normal" college experience as UVA's? And experiences at other colleges like CMU are abnormal?
This is my question too, several posts seem having concern about the experience in CMU. What is exactly the concern?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read all posts, very helpful discussion. So the argument is basically about the money, right? If money is not an issue, people will always choose CMU, am I right?
The cost savings is one factor. Another is this: do you want your kid to have a normal college experience? If so, choose UVA.
So you define a "normal" college experience as UVA's? And experiences at other colleges like CMU are abnormal?
This is my question too, several posts seem having concern about the experience in CMU. What is exactly the concern?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read all posts, very helpful discussion. So the argument is basically about the money, right? If money is not an issue, people will always choose CMU, am I right?
The cost savings is one factor. Another is this: do you want your kid to have a normal college experience? If so, choose UVA.
So you define a "normal" college experience as UVA's? And experiences at other colleges like CMU are abnormal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read all posts, very helpful discussion. So the argument is basically about the money, right? If money is not an issue, people will always choose CMU, am I right?
The cost savings is one factor. Another is this: do you want your kid to have a normal college experience? If so, choose UVA.
So you define a "normal" college experience as UVA's? And experiences at other colleges like CMU are abnormal?
I'm not saying this is good or bad, but at UVA, most of the students will have spent their lives in VA - a different story at CMU.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read all posts, very helpful discussion. So the argument is basically about the money, right? If money is not an issue, people will always choose CMU, am I right?
The cost savings is one factor. Another is this: do you want your kid to have a normal college experience? If so, choose UVA.
So you define a "normal" college experience as UVA's? And experiences at other colleges like CMU are abnormal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read all posts, very helpful discussion. So the argument is basically about the money, right? If money is not an issue, people will always choose CMU, am I right?
The cost savings is one factor. Another is this: do you want your kid to have a normal college experience? If so, choose UVA.
Anonymous wrote:This isn't even close--UVA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When considering colleges, it's always useful to attempt to project a college's reputation 20 or 30 years hence.
Here's a potential problem with CMU. Currently it occupies a position of approximately 25th among national research unis.
But what's gonna happen if the Asians' lawsuit against Harvard succeeds, and the unstated (but rigid) quota system at the Ivies is ruled illegal?
As you know, the Ivies all somehow mysteriously/coincidentally limit Asian enrollment to 20%. This means that a school like CMU, which does not discriminate against Asians, is a beneficiary of the Ivy quota system.
If that quota system is eliminated, the demand for spots at CMU will decline. CMU will quite possibly fall in the rankings. Perhaps precipitously.
Just something to consider. (Especially if you're contemplating an additional spend of $40K/year over a degree from UVA.)
Your flaw in logic is that you think that CMU’s reputation is tied to the ivies, and that it is a second choice for Asian students. CMU is a very different type of school.
Your second major flaw is that you think the number of science and math grads we will need will decrease.
Are you also arguing that MIT and Hopkins will decrease in value? CMU is much more closely aligned with these schools than the ivies.
The schools whose fortunes might be tied to Obie’s would be places like UMich and GA Tech
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read all posts, very helpful discussion. So the argument is basically about the money, right? If money is not an issue, people will always choose CMU, am I right?
It depends, but mostly yes, it's a money issue for a lot of people that get admitted. Though even if I would have HHI 250k, I would still think about 50k more per year vs in-state UVA. Also, I want my DC near by.
Anonymous wrote:Read all posts, very helpful discussion. So the argument is basically about the money, right? If money is not an issue, people will always choose CMU, am I right?
Anonymous wrote:When considering colleges, it's always useful to attempt to project a college's reputation 20 or 30 years hence.
Here's a potential problem with CMU. Currently it occupies a position of approximately 25th among national research unis.
But what's gonna happen if the Asians' lawsuit against Harvard succeeds, and the unstated (but rigid) quota system at the Ivies is ruled illegal?
As you know, the Ivies all somehow mysteriously/coincidentally limit Asian enrollment to 20%. This means that a school like CMU, which does not discriminate against Asians, is a beneficiary of the Ivy quota system.
If that quota system is eliminated, the demand for spots at CMU will decline. CMU will quite possibly fall in the rankings. Perhaps precipitously.
Just something to consider. (Especially if you're contemplating an additional spend of $40K/year over a degree from UVA.)
Anonymous wrote:To the PP who thinks that only rah rah kids, versus math/science kids, would choose UVA over CMU, that is just false. Our DC (TJ grad) chose UVA, other grads the same year chose CMU. The difference was not based on who was / was not interested in math or science - they all were. The difference for our DC was just that UVA felt more welcoming and more in line with what DC was hoping for from a college --- and from what I have seen, UVA seems more flexible with other courses (DC will have a dual Engineering and Arts major at the end) and possibly less stressful/more like a traditional university campus experience. Both seem very rigorous for the engineering degree.