Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s irrelevant and embarrassing. Any port in a storm I guess .

Do you understand why the GOP is so incredibly unpopular with women? Do you know why we all call you misogynists? Do you even know that you are a misogynist?

How many times can pronounce that word in a minute?

Would you like some help diagramming sentences? Would that help?

Anonymous wrote:^^^I guarantee you - nothing will come of this. Nothing.

HAHAHAHA nope

Federal Judge Denies Trump’s Request to Further Delay E. Jean Carroll’s Lawsuit Pending Appeal.

Wrong Judge this time. Trump has a problem. His lawyers are clown cars.

Anonymous wrote:^^^I guarantee you - nothing will come of this. Nothing.

You are right because SDNY is on the take, but if they get new blood next year which they are. Well...

This is not the only case against trump, but he usually gets a slap on the wrist for his same crimes.
Dt Univeristy, foundation, Teen modeling (outrage conservatives they were illegal teens) Children's cancer charities, Dog rescues. and his most recent credit card fraud.

^^^I guarantee you - nothing will come of this. Nothing.

Time’s up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s irrelevant and embarrassing. Any port in a storm I guess .

Do you understand why the GOP is so incredibly unpopular with women? Do you know why we all call you misogynists? Do you even know that you are a misogynist?

How many times can pronounce that word in a minute?

+100
Ridiculous people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s irrelevant and embarrassing. Any port in a storm I guess .

Do you understand why the GOP is so incredibly unpopular with women? Do you know why we all call you misogynists? Do you even know that you are a misogynist?

How many times can pronounce that word in a minute?

A SDNY federal judge just removed the DOJ from E. Jean Carroll's defamation lawsuit and ordered his high priced legal team back on the job at his expense.
https://lawandcrime.com/awkward/federal-judge-strikes-doj-from-the-docket-in-e-jean-carrolls-case-against-donald-trump/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s irrelevant and embarrassing. Any port in a storm I guess .

Do you understand why the GOP is so incredibly unpopular with women? Do you know why we all call you misogynists? Do you even know that you are a misogynist?

And do you understand why the Democratic party is unpopular with conservative women? Do you know why you are called hysterical harridans, foaming-at-the-mouth feministas for making baseless claims without evidence such as Christine Ford? Do you even know you are a misandrist?

Lord the stupidity of some conservatives is tough to take.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s irrelevant and embarrassing. Any port in a storm I guess .

Do you understand why the GOP is so incredibly unpopular with women? Do you know why we all call you misogynists? Do you even know that you are a misogynist?

And do you understand why the Democratic party is unpopular with conservative women? Do you know why you are called hysterical harridans, foaming-at-the-mouth feministas for making baseless claims without evidence such as Christine Ford? Do you even know you are a misandrist?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s irrelevant and embarrassing. Any port in a storm I guess .

A port in a storm WITH DNA EVIDENCE.

The report notes that “acid phosphatase activity, a presumptive indication of the presence of semen,” was not detected on either the dress or the shoes. Male DNA was detected on the dress, the report says, mostly on the right sleeve, as well as on the left sleeve, the left and right front shoulder area and outside and inside the garment’s front skirt area.

Testing eliminated several of the people whose DNA was submitted by Ms. Kaplan as potential contributors to the genetic material found on the left and right sleeves of the dress, the report says.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/01/30/nyregion/e-jean-carroll-trump-dna.amp.html

Anonymous wrote:She’s irrelevant and embarrassing. Any port in a storm I guess .

Do you understand why the GOP is so incredibly unpopular with women? Do you know why we all call you misogynists? Do you even know that you are a misogynist?

Anonymous wrote:She’s irrelevant and embarrassing. Any port in a storm I guess .

The DOJ taking the unprecedented step of defending the President in a civil suit is very relevant.

Anonymous wrote:She’s irrelevant and embarrassing. Any port in a storm I guess .

A port in a storm WITH DNA EVIDENCE.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Legal eagles: how next will the skink in chief wiggle out of this? He has seemingly endless chances.

Our country is the Banana Republic. Even if the Judge orders Trump to provide the DNA, how can this be implemented?

I can’t remember if it was on this thread or elsewhere that I saw it speculated that perhaps Mary Trump is a close enough relative to provide a DNA sample.

She should.

GREAT IDEA!