Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um. He paid it off to protect his credit.
He also paid off the subsidized loans that were only in student’s name.
Ok, let's say that that's true. It's still NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS. It's his money, not yours.
This. Why do you care OP? He isn’t obligated to pay for any or all grandchildren’s loans. It really doesn’t matter and it isn’t any of your concern.
He didn't say he was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um. He paid it off to protect his credit.
He also paid off the subsidized loans that were only in student’s name.
Ok, let's say that that's true. It's still NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS. It's his money, not yours.
This. Why do you care OP? He isn’t obligated to pay for any or all grandchildren’s loans. It really doesn’t matter and it isn’t any of your concern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP what you should be posting is "No good deed goes unpunished. My FIL was nice enough to co-sign for his grandson, and now he's stuck with the bill and the grandson is an ingrate."
Why do so so so many DCUMers hate their in laws???
I agree..
OP, you sound so jealous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He paid off thousands of dollars of loans for grandson who dropped out of college after one semester but owed a lot of money. FIL was co-signor on loan bc son had bad credit. FIL has not offered to pay for my kid’s educations. We can afford it but it seems unfair that my kids get a $20 bill for birthday and Christmas, but nothing substantial like college tuition (and other big expenses). My kids have worked hard to earn substantial scholarships and wouldn’t require much assistance. It seems the squeaky wheel gets the grease.
Do you really not understand this? He was on the hook for the loan. So he paid it off. Ugh, you sound super entitled and dramatic. Give it a rest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um. He paid it off to protect his credit.
He also paid off the subsidized loans that were only in student’s name.
Ok, let's say that that's true. It's still NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS. It's his money, not yours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read the parable about the prodigal son
Alternatively, look at the story of Jacob giving Joseph a special coat and his brothers selling him into slavery. The lesson that Judaism derives from this is that it's forbidden to favor one child over another because it leads to jealousy and resentment. As it has here. OP's feelings are normal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op do you understand a co-signer's responsibility?
I understand the FIL getting right with the bank, but shouldn't the kid make some effort to him back as opposed to "walking"? I wonder if there's an understanding btw FIL and granson?
Anonymous wrote:He paid off thousands of dollars of loans for grandson who dropped out of college after one semester but owed a lot of money. FIL was co-signor on loan bc son had bad credit. FIL has not offered to pay for my kid’s educations. We can afford it but it seems unfair that my kids get a $20 bill for birthday and Christmas, but nothing substantial like college tuition (and other big expenses). My kids have worked hard to earn substantial scholarships and wouldn’t require much assistance. It seems the squeaky wheel gets the grease.
Anonymous wrote:Read the parable about the prodigal son
Anonymous wrote:He paid off thousands of dollars of loans for grandson who dropped out of college after one semester but owed a lot of money. FIL was co-signor on loan bc son had bad credit. FIL has not offered to pay for my kid’s educations. We can afford it but it seems unfair that my kids get a $20 bill for birthday and Christmas, but nothing substantial like college tuition (and other big expenses). My kids have worked hard to earn substantial scholarships and wouldn’t require much assistance. It seems the squeaky wheel gets the grease.