Anonymous wrote:McConnell supported him too. Many did.
Anonymous wrote:A man whose sentence for sexual assault was commuted by outgoing Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin (R) last year was arrested on Tuesday on charges of producing child pornography, federal officials said.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/491745-kentucky-man-whose-sexual-assault-sentence-was-commuted-arrested-on?amp&__twitter_impression=true
https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdky/pr/dayton-jones-charged-us-attorney-production-child-porn
Anonymous wrote:Quelle surprise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fBi is reportedly investigating the Bevin pardons to see whether he was unduly influenced by political motivations and donations.
Why isn't Trump pressuring the AG the to announce an investigation into this? He can do it for an investigation into the Bidens, why not this? It's far more corrupt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fBi is reportedly investigating the Bevin pardons to see whether he was unduly influenced by political motivations and donations.
Why isn't Trump pressuring the AG the to announce an investigation into this? He can do it for an investigation into the Bidens, why not this? It's far more corrupt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fBi is reportedly investigating the Bevin pardons to see whether he was unduly influenced by political motivations and donations.
Why isn't Trump pressuring the AG the to announce an investigation into this? He can do it for an investigation into the Bidens, why not this? It's far more corrupt.
Anonymous wrote:The fBi is reportedly investigating the Bevin pardons to see whether he was unduly influenced by political motivations and donations.
Anonymous wrote:The fBi is reportedly investigating the Bevin pardons to see whether he was unduly influenced by political motivations and donations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did the guy have multiple occasions to assault the girl? That’s not in the article I can access.
He was a relative of the girl. I don’t know why idiots like Bevin decide they know better than a judge and jury who listened to the trial.
Because there was no forensic evidence at all? Just her word?
So what? Forensic evidence isn’t a requirement if you have other types of evidence. But sure, you seem think it’s fine to let out a predator of young girls on a whim. I hope he moves to your neighborhood.
Forensic evidence is very important if you plan to put someone away. Without it, you don’t actually know if he is a predator of young girls.
How was rape prosecuted before DNA testing?
It pretty much wasn't, and still isn't way more than half the time that it's reported. We all know it's often not reported.
According to FBI statistics, out of 127,258 rapes reported to police departments in 2018, 33.4 percent resulted in an arrest.
The question you should be asking is how many were put away who were innocent prior to DNA?
No, that is ONE question. Justice is denied both when men are falsely convicted of rape and when rapists are not convicted. Anyone claiming to care about justice should care about both. Please go redpill somewhere else.
The problem is, without evidence, it’s just accusations, i.e. someone’s word. How on earth did their mother not know?