Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't pay her in cash anymore. No more confusion.
If my employer overpaid me it would come off my next cheque. What makes people think a nanny should be different?
Does anybody here get a "Thanksgiving bonus"?
Are you a household employee who gets paid under the table in cash? If not, the comparison is irrelevant. Sit down.
Why do you think the Nanny should get to keep money she isn't entitled to? Because she chooses to be paid under the table? (Op wasn't smart to agree to that)
What about a minimum wage worker... maybe a waitress. Should they get to keep money paid in error? They don't make much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't pay her in cash anymore. No more confusion.
If my employer overpaid me it would come off my next cheque. What makes people think a nanny should be different?
Does anybody here get a "Thanksgiving bonus"?
Are you a household employee who gets paid under the table in cash? If not, the comparison is irrelevant. Sit down.
Anonymous wrote:Don't pay her in cash anymore. No more confusion.
If my employer overpaid me it would come off my next cheque. What makes people think a nanny should be different?
Does anybody here get a "Thanksgiving bonus"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder how many of these holier-than-thou posters are paying under the table IRL.
You’re a moron to do this.
My friend did and it cost her a pretty penny. The nanny fell down the stairs and broke her wrist in two places and required surgery. She had paid her under the table to avoid taxes and all the “messy” things that come with hiring help. The nanny had to go to the ER by ambulance, which was called by my friend’s son. The ER worked it up as an employer compensation case and then learned she had none. Because of the way she was classified when she came in, the nanny’s insurance wouldn’t pay for her care since her injury happened at work. My friend ended up having to pay out of pocket plus got investigated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People are being harsh and frankly none of them could afford a nanny in the first place.
This is a very awkward situation. You are a generous employer and she hasn’t worked there long. That she “forgot” you overpaid her is a bit concerning. I would be firm and explain but I don’t know the future of this relationship.
Oh, please. You are as ridiculous as OP. I, and other posters, employ nannies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would have just let her keep the $60 and never mentioned it.
+1
It was your error. Be more careful next time.
Anonymous wrote:People are being harsh and frankly none of them could afford a nanny in the first place.
This is a very awkward situation. You are a generous employer and she hasn’t worked there long. That she “forgot” you overpaid her is a bit concerning. I would be firm and explain but I don’t know the future of this relationship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am the PP who overpaid my nanny about $200 (a day's pay). I'm curious what they would say about my situation. Is $200 enough to NOT overlook? (And two weeks into employment to boot.) How much is too much to overlook? $60 may be a lot to the OP.
I would say you are fairly ignorant as you cannot count. There is a huge difference in overpaying $60 to $200! I also hope all of you who cheat your nanny by paying in cash/hiring undocumented person get caught and pay a huge price.
Anonymous wrote:I am the PP who overpaid my nanny about $200 (a day's pay). I'm curious what they would say about my situation. Is $200 enough to NOT overlook? (And two weeks into employment to boot.) How much is too much to overlook? $60 may be a lot to the OP.