Anonymous wrote:Hi, OP—we also have a very high HHI and had our third child earlier this year. We had a night nurse for anywhere from 3 to 6 nights a week. The baby would do amazing with the night nurse—wake just once a night. Then on nights where he slept next to my bed he would wake multiple times and I’d be exhausted. So personally I think if you can afford it you should do a night nurse every night. A good night’s sleep is worth it. I also had childcare Monday-Thursday (already arranged as I work) but think I was fairly present with my older kids. I don’t really see a problem with your desired arrangement as long as you are really spending a lot of time with your kids one-on-one rather than just going out to get your nails done and such. My husband was all for my being well-rested and also refused to get up at all for the baby—he’s an awesome dad but his thought was waking up at night would mean he’d be less productive the next day and lose way more $$$ of productivity than the cost of a night nurse. I guess that’s not how your husband feels though ...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a breadwinner mom. Like your DH I have to work long hours to earn the money that affords us a nice lifestyle. Like your DH, I earn good money (though less than your DH), but not quit my job type wealth. I imagine your DH has no choice but to work, and you clearly have no interest in leading a frugal lifestyle to allow him to retire earlier. If my DH stayed home and demanded 24/7 help with two healthy children (plus weekly paid housecleaning), I would have no respect for him, and would wonder what exactly he was contributing to our household. I have 4 kids, and have experienced having a baby + toddler (plus older kids!). It is not always easy, but it does not require 24/7 help - you are not caring for someone with cancer. And your DH does not do “nothing” - he pays for every single thing you have. Talk to a single mom if you want to understand what it means to have a dad who does “nothing”. Some help is reasonable, but that level of help is not fair, given that your DH has to work to earn that money. If he was a billionaire who works for fun, sure, hire someone to wipe your butt. But you are not that rich. And LOL that people on DCUM are so out of touch they consider caring for two kids “being a martyr”. In most of the USA and world, not having to work outside the home and caring for only 2 kids while having a weekly housecleaner (plus a $750k lifestyle) would be considered living in the lap of luxury.
This.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a breadwinner mom. Like your DH I have to work long hours to earn the money that affords us a nice lifestyle. Like your DH, I earn good money (though less than your DH), but not quit my job type wealth. I imagine your DH has no choice but to work, and you clearly have no interest in leading a frugal lifestyle to allow him to retire earlier. If my DH stayed home and demanded 24/7 help with two healthy children (plus weekly paid housecleaning), I would have no respect for him, and would wonder what exactly he was contributing to our household. I have 4 kids, and have experienced having a baby + toddler (plus older kids!). It is not always easy, but it does not require 24/7 help - you are not caring for someone with cancer. And your DH does not do “nothing” - he pays for every single thing you have. Talk to a single mom if you want to understand what it means to have a dad who does “nothing”. Some help is reasonable, but that level of help is not fair, given that your DH has to work to earn that money. If he was a billionaire who works for fun, sure, hire someone to wipe your butt. But you are not that rich. And LOL that people on DCUM are so out of touch they consider caring for two kids “being a martyr”. In most of the USA and world, not having to work outside the home and caring for only 2 kids while having a weekly housecleaner (plus a $750k lifestyle) would be considered living in the lap of luxury.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, if you’re a SAHM who wants to hire 24/7 help for 3 months, I’d balk at that too.
I don’t get this perspective. What are you working for if not to make your life better? The DH works all the time and does no household labor. Fine. What’s the point of this lady killing herself trying to do it all when a part time nanny and night nurse could significantly improve the family’s life? You can’t take the money with you.
OP, do you have an expensive car? Expensive jewelry? Tell him you want to sell it to pay for the night nurse/nanny. I think people who have family support don’t understand how difficult it is to take care of children on your own with zero breaks. It’s exhausting.
I’m the pp you’re replying to. I think 24/7 help for 3 months is absurd, but I’m definitely not arguing that OP shouldn’t hire help. Surely you can see that there’s a lot of leeway between never, ever being alone with your children for the first 3 months of baby #2’s life versus hiring enough help that you get some rest and have help feeding/bathing the children and doing their laundry? I was a SAHM to preterm twins and I had a lot of help, but I wasn’t afraid of spending a single hour alone with my babies.
You were really harsh in your first post and it implied that hiring help was a ridiculous idea. You backtracked ALOT from your original position. I actually think OP would be better off hiring a night nurse a few times a week for a month or 2, and hiring a part time nanny for the rest of the year. This would probably cost the same as 24/7 help for 3 months and be much more useful. She’s still going to need a break when the baby is 3 months old.
Anonymous wrote:I think hiring a night nurse is a sensible compromise. Having 24/7 care for three months probably means hiring three or four baby nurses to cover, which seems excessive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think hiring a night nurse is a sensible compromise. Having 24/7 care for three months probably means hiring three or four baby nurses to cover, which seems excessive.
OP here. I want someone there during the day too so I can spend one on one time with my toddler and not disrupt her routine, etc.
Basically it would allow me to come and go as needed.
I know it is expensive but it'll make the transition so much easier. We can afford it so I don't see what the issue is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think hiring a night nurse is a sensible compromise. Having 24/7 care for three months probably means hiring three or four baby nurses to cover, which seems excessive.
OP here. I want someone there during the day too so I can spend one on one time with my toddler and not disrupt her routine, etc.
Basically it would allow me to come and go as needed.
I know it is expensive but it'll make the transition so much easier. We can afford it so I don't see what the issue is.