Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SM here. Difference is I work, but DH had two kids that I raised and we had a kid. 1/3 of half goes to each kid and half goes to my bio kid. I’ve been upfront with DH that is what I’ll do if he dies before me. I’m not penalizing my kid for having me as a mom.
This is what I am doing.
Gross
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You got $250,000 and you're complaining because your step mother is giving HER son money from HER share of the will. She may not have worked outside of the home since you were 14, but she certainly worked inside of the home taking on your dad and his two kids, loving you, raising you, and cleaning up after you.
You are incredibly ungrateful.
OP was 14 when her baby brother was born. I bet stepmom got a LOT of free babysitting from OP. Her stepmom lucked out in having a live-in babysitter to make her life easier. Now she’s doubling down on taking advantage of OP and her brother to direct all the inheritance to her biokid. What a user.
You sound unhinged.
Really? You’re invested in the story of a selfless stepmom “taking care of a teenager.” I’m presenting the more likely possibility that the teens helped their stepmom a LOT in taking care of her new baby. It wouldn’t surprise me if the teens were treated like unpaid au pairs.
I’m sorry you get so upset if someone challenges the version you’ve convinced yourself is the right one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You got $250,000 and you're complaining because your step mother is giving HER son money from HER share of the will. She may not have worked outside of the home since you were 14, but she certainly worked inside of the home taking on your dad and his two kids, loving you, raising you, and cleaning up after you.
You are incredibly ungrateful.
OP was 14 when her baby brother was born. I bet stepmom got a LOT of free babysitting from OP. Her stepmom lucked out in having a live-in babysitter to make her life easier. Now she’s doubling down on taking advantage of OP and her brother to direct all the inheritance to her biokid. What a user.
You sound unhinged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SM here. Difference is I work, but DH had two kids that I raised and we had a kid. 1/3 of half goes to each kid and half goes to my bio kid. I’ve been upfront with DH that is what I’ll do if he dies before me. I’m not penalizing my kid for having me as a mom.
This is what I am doing.
Gross
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You got $250,000 and you're complaining because your step mother is giving HER son money from HER share of the will. She may not have worked outside of the home since you were 14, but she certainly worked inside of the home taking on your dad and his two kids, loving you, raising you, and cleaning up after you.
You are incredibly ungrateful.
OP was 14 when her baby brother was born. I bet stepmom got a LOT of free babysitting from OP. Her stepmom lucked out in having a live-in babysitter to make her life easier. Now she’s doubling down on taking advantage of OP and her brother to direct all the inheritance to her biokid. What a user.
Anonymous wrote:You got $250,000 and you're complaining because your step mother is giving HER son money from HER share of the will. She may not have worked outside of the home since you were 14, but she certainly worked inside of the home taking on your dad and his two kids, loving you, raising you, and cleaning up after you.
You are incredibly ungrateful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think more than anything, he emotional aspect it’s what stings. If I lost my mom, and thought I had unconditional love from my stepmom - and then found out it wasn’t fair? It would hurt. A lot.
It doesn’t mean the SM is wrong, but it is absolutely something that’s insensitive and divisive. And it doesn’t have to be about giving $1000/mo to one child our of your three. It’s giving anything to one child that you don’t give to the other. Parenting 101.
If SM had a vacation but only invited her bio kid, etc - she’s wrong. She would be wrong if she were SM, biomom, grandmom, adoptive mom.
It’s the principle of family inclusion, ESPECIALLY since OP has lost BOTH bio parents before 40. And your Mom is going to start excluding affection, gifts, etc? Again, people have a right to do what they want in this case. But that doesn’t make it morally right.
It's a great lie that a woman will give equal affection to her own flesh and blood baby and a girl who was 12 already. No they aren't equal in the stepmother's eyes, what made you think they ever were?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SM here. Difference is I work, but DH had two kids that I raised and we had a kid. 1/3 of half goes to each kid and half goes to my bio kid. I’ve been upfront with DH that is what I’ll do if he dies before me. I’m not penalizing my kid for having me as a mom.
This is what I am doing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now comes the stay at home gold digger contingency...
You sound broke.
Anonymous wrote:Now comes the stay at home gold digger contingency...
Anonymous wrote:Are you seriously complaining after receiving $250K? Seriously?