Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.
All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.
Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.
Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."
Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.
Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.
All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.
Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.
Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."
Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.
Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.
All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.
Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.
Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."
Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.
Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?
Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.
All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.
Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Attorney General William Barr called President Trump in April with a question: What was Rudy Giuliani doing?”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/tense-relationship-between-barr-and-giuliani-complicates-trump-impeachment-defense-11569942261?mod=mhp
The headline of that story is a big issue - "The president’s two highest-profile lawyers are struggling to get on the same page"
The Attorney General is NOT the President's lawyer.
Right. So this is a total "non story." Giulani and Barr have different clients. There is no reason to expect them to be "on the same page."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems that the real story here is how fearful former Obama and FBI officials are. They seek to discredit AG Barr as AG/Durham learn more about the origins of the Trump probe. It’s almost like they have something to hide and don’t want it found.
Imagine for a second that this was AG Lynch traveling around asking foreign officials to debunk an FBI report her boss didn't like.
It's more than that. They're actually asking foreign governments to say that Russia didn't hack us n 2016 but rather that Obama did!
Obama was the President during the 2016 campaign, was apparently aware of the alleged Russian interference, yet did absolutely nothing to stop it. If it's true that Russian interference occurred, investigation of the Obama Administration's failure to do anything to stop it is indeed warranted. On the other hand, if there wasn't significant Russian interference, that would explain why Obama did nothing about it. In either case, there is nothing wrong with Barr requesting the assistance of foreign governments to get to the bottom of this. Just as Obama's use of foreign governmental resources to spy on the Trump campaign is possibly not illegal, although maybe it was illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems that the real story here is how fearful former Obama and FBI officials are. They seek to discredit AG Barr as AG/Durham learn more about the origins of the Trump probe. It’s almost like they have something to hide and don’t want it found.
Imagine for a second that this was AG Lynch traveling around asking foreign officials to debunk an FBI report her boss didn't like.
It's more than that. They're actually asking foreign governments to say that Russia didn't hack us n 2016 but rather that Obama did!
Obama was the President during the 2016 campaign, was apparently aware of the alleged Russian interference, yet did absolutely nothing to stop it. If it's true that Russian interference occurred, investigation of the Obama Administration's failure to do anything to stop it is indeed warranted. On the other hand, if there wasn't significant Russian interference, that would explain why Obama did nothing about it. In either case, there is nothing wrong with Barr requesting the assistance of foreign governments to get to the bottom of this. Just as Obama's use of foreign governmental resources to spy on the Trump campaign is possibly not illegal, although maybe it was illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Attorney General William Barr called President Trump in April with a question: What was Rudy Giuliani doing?”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/tense-relationship-between-barr-and-giuliani-complicates-trump-impeachment-defense-11569942261?mod=mhp
The headline of that story is a big issue - "The president’s two highest-profile lawyers are struggling to get on the same page"
The Attorney General is NOT the President's lawyer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://apnews.com/7246ca01d5fc4444b0cc8ad65006c390
DOJ official said Trump initiated the calls at Barr’s request. The recent call with Australia was one of a “number of times” the president made similar calls for the AG as part of probe into the origins of the special counsel’s Russia investigation
Is this legal for the AG to coordinate investigation with Trump which politically benefit him?
Of course it is legal. Do you not think that investigating and impeaching Trump by various Democrats, using public funds and resources, will "politically benefit" them? Do you believe Schiff, Nadler, Pelosi, et al are violating any law just because using public resources and public employees to investigate Trump is of "political benefit" to them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems that the real story here is how fearful former Obama and FBI officials are. They seek to discredit AG Barr as AG/Durham learn more about the origins of the Trump probe. It’s almost like they have something to hide and don’t want it found.
Imagine for a second that this was AG Lynch traveling around asking foreign officials to debunk an FBI report her boss didn't like.
It's more than that. They're actually asking foreign governments to say that Russia didn't hack us n 2016 but rather that Obama did!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://apnews.com/7246ca01d5fc4444b0cc8ad65006c390
DOJ official said Trump initiated the calls at Barr’s request. The recent call with Australia was one of a “number of times” the president made similar calls for the AG as part of probe into the origins of the special counsel’s Russia investigation
Is this legal for the AG to coordinate investigation with Trump which politically benefit him?
Of course it is legal. Do you not think that investigating and impeaching Trump by various Democrats, using public funds and resources, will "politically benefit" them? Do you believe Schiff, Nadler, Pelosi, et al are violating any law just because using public resources and public employees to investigate Trump is of "political benefit" to them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Attorney General William Barr called President Trump in April with a question: What was Rudy Giuliani doing?”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/tense-relationship-between-barr-and-giuliani-complicates-trump-impeachment-defense-11569942261?mod=mhp
Not long afterward, he booked his end-of-year party at the Trump Hotel. That's the definition of a tense relationship, in Opposite World.
Anonymous wrote:https://apnews.com/7246ca01d5fc4444b0cc8ad65006c390
DOJ official said Trump initiated the calls at Barr’s request. The recent call with Australia was one of a “number of times” the president made similar calls for the AG as part of probe into the origins of the special counsel’s Russia investigation
Is this legal for the AG to coordinate investigation with Trump which politically benefit him?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Attorney General William Barr called President Trump in April with a question: What was Rudy Giuliani doing?”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/tense-relationship-between-barr-and-giuliani-complicates-trump-impeachment-defense-11569942261?mod=mhp
The headline of that story is a big issue - "The president’s two highest-profile lawyers are struggling to get on the same page"
The Attorney General is NOT the President's lawyer.
Anonymous wrote:“Attorney General William Barr called President Trump in April with a question: What was Rudy Giuliani doing?”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/tense-relationship-between-barr-and-giuliani-complicates-trump-impeachment-defense-11569942261?mod=mhp