Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

He is pig dog unfit for the court. He is bought and paid for and I bet there are a half dozen rapes out there.

Also never complain about “well funded and well organize groups who are opposed”. The name Merrick Garland should be figuratively burnt into your skin so you remember this.

You must be 17. One word: Bork.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

He is pig dog unfit for the court. He is bought and paid for and I bet there are a half dozen rapes out there.

Also never complain about “well funded and well organize groups who are opposed”. The name Merrick Garland should be figuratively burnt into your skin so you remember this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of us, on those multi-day Kavanaugh threads at the time, who said, the FBI wasn't investigating the allegations fully and were pooh-poohed by the apologists, I hope we come to a point where Kavanaugh is impeached for lying to the Senate committee.

Oh, and who paid his 6 figures debts?

+1
+1
+1
+1
+1

He’s a criminal and should be facing disbarment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

Gorsuch did not have this problem because he was highly qualified and exemplary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

He is pig dog unfit for the court. He is bought and paid for and I bet there are a half dozen rapes out there.

Also never complain about “well funded and well organize groups who are opposed”. The name Merrick Garland should be figuratively burnt into your skin so you remember this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this time they come from a man who says he saw kavanaugh shove his penis into a womaj’s face at a college party

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/461436-kavanaugh-accused-of-more-unwanted-sexual-contact-by-former

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was hit with another accusation of unwanted sexual contact by a male classmate who said he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself and press his genitals against a woman without her consent.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the latest allegation, which has until not been public, was reported to the FBI during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation process last year but was not investigated by the FBI.

In the Times report, two FBI officials told the newspaper that a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, D.C.-based nonprofit owner Max Stier, said that he had witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a party before other students pushed Kavanaugh's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent.

The Hill has reached out to the Supreme Court for comment.”

Ok, let me get this straight....

1) BK exposed himself at a party.

2) Other students "pushed" BK's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent

So, the other students somehow managed to "push" his genitals into the open (I'm assuming) hand of a girl without her consent? She was standing there, right next to BK, with her hand open in just the right spot so that others could "push" his junk into her hand?

Then, he told the FBI but did not tell any of the Dem senators who were like heat seeking missiles, looking for anything to pin on him?

He literally couldn’t keep it in his pants. This is 100% on the dirtbag with his pants unzipped.

Well... if you believe a 30+ year old allegation by a guy who may or may not have witnessed this. Obviously, you do. I’m extremely skeptical it happened at all.
-DP

We know. We know you never believe any woman. There’s never a woman who you believe no matter how small or how big the charge (unless she accused a Democrat - suddenly you guys are convinced, curiously. But I have them suspicion that you don’t really believe those women, you just hate Democrats). Even when you’re women and you’ve had gropes, crude remarks and rapes of your own. Your POV is patriarchy and misogyny wrapped up in sadistic little package meant to look reasonable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

Anonymous wrote:For those of us, on those multi-day Kavanaugh threads at the time, who said, the FBI wasn't investigating the allegations fully and were pooh-poohed by the apologists, I hope we come to a point where Kavanaugh is impeached for lying to the Senate committee.

Oh, and who paid his 6 figures debts?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is I'm sure is the least popular opinion on DCUM, but I did not find Ford's account believable. At all.

Kav is one of the most politically despised people in the history of America and haters will stop at nothing to destroy him. As such, we can expect random unverifiable allegations of the most heinous nature from time to time. It does not reflect well on anyone.

Eh. I wasn't really that interested in Ford, one way or the other. I was interested in Kavanaugh's more recent professional past and his behavior during the hearings.

Didn't pass muster, any of it. Which Republicans all knew and didn't care about. And they had their pick, could have put forward anyone. Insulting that they picked him and stuck with him. They deserve to lose the Senate for it.

Genuine question - what recent professional acts do you feel did not pass muster? I was under the impression he had a pretty spotless record.

He ran up 6 figure debts which were magically erased concurrent with his nomination and it was not disclosed on his financial filings.

That was just last year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.

He is pig dog unfit for the court. He is bought and paid for and I bet there are a half dozen rapes out there.

Also never complain about “well funded and well organize groups who are opposed”. The name Merrick Garland should be figuratively burnt into your skin so you remember this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These stories will forever circulate. This is why creepy men (or women if any) shouldn’t be SC judges. He is making everyone look bad.

No, this whole story is evidence that we not allow the well-funded and well-organized groups who are opposed to the nominee of a Republican president to derail the nomination of a highly qualified and exemplary candidate.
We have let it happen before. No more. We learned our lesson.