Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a complete fantasy that excess weight (and I mean more than 20 lbs overweight) causes zero health problems.
When you have more weight for your body to carry, it necessarily puts more pressure on your muscles and bones. At the extreme, it's harder for doctors to do surgery because they have to cut through the fat.
For some people, they can't help it, but for many it's PREVENTABLE.
That's why it's completely different from having special needs and comparing the two is offensive.
You can say the same about being xs and s or at the bottom of your BMI. It causes health related problems.
When did I say it didn't?
Jeez, it's so triggering for all of you to hear that ANYONE who is fat might bear some responsibility for it and might be suffering health consequences.
Not nearly as triggering as it is for some people to hear that there are fat people out there who still love themselves and are happy.
They can love themselves and be happy, but they're likely still suffering health consequences from it and COULD bear responsibility for gaining that much weight.
And before someone attacks me -- the same can be said for people who are too thin.
Anonymous wrote:I feel like the body positive movement completely disregards the long term health problems with being overweight. Obesity is a public health problem and nothing to be positive about! Our society needs to address ultra processed foods and the burden of work demands on health.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a complete fantasy that excess weight (and I mean more than 20 lbs overweight) causes zero health problems.
When you have more weight for your body to carry, it necessarily puts more pressure on your muscles and bones. At the extreme, it's harder for doctors to do surgery because they have to cut through the fat.
For some people, they can't help it, but for many it's PREVENTABLE.
That's why it's completely different from having special needs and comparing the two is offensive.
You can say the same about being xs and s or at the bottom of your BMI. It causes health related problems.
When did I say it didn't?
Jeez, it's so triggering for all of you to hear that ANYONE who is fat might bear some responsibility for it and might be suffering health consequences.
Not nearly as triggering as it is for some people to hear that there are fat people out there who still love themselves and are happy.
They can love themselves and be happy, but they're likely still suffering health consequences from it and COULD bear responsibility for gaining that much weight.
And before someone attacks me -- the same can be said for people who are too thin.
Anonymous wrote:To get back to the actual question - I dont know what the movement you reference is, but if you're referring to people like Ashley Graham, Tess Holliday, Lizzo etc - I think part of it is that they see themselves as ambassadors who bring positivity to the lives of people who might not always feel it, from people who look like them. And to deny that someone should do that is really pretty crappy.
The average size 12, 14, and 16 woman is overweight bordering obese. It is unhealthy. Sorry snowflake, science doesn’t agree with you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a complete fantasy that excess weight (and I mean more than 20 lbs overweight) causes zero health problems.
When you have more weight for your body to carry, it necessarily puts more pressure on your muscles and bones. At the extreme, it's harder for doctors to do surgery because they have to cut through the fat.
For some people, they can't help it, but for many it's PREVENTABLE.
That's why it's completely different from having special needs and comparing the two is offensive.
You can say the same about being xs and s or at the bottom of your BMI. It causes health related problems.
When did I say it didn't?
Jeez, it's so triggering for all of you to hear that ANYONE who is fat might bear some responsibility for it and might be suffering health consequences.
Not nearly as triggering as it is for some people to hear that there are fat people out there who still love themselves and are happy.
They can love themselves and be happy, but they're likely still suffering health consequences from it and COULD bear responsibility for gaining that much weight.
And before someone attacks me -- the same can be said for people who are too thin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a complete fantasy that excess weight (and I mean more than 20 lbs overweight) causes zero health problems.
When you have more weight for your body to carry, it necessarily puts more pressure on your muscles and bones. At the extreme, it's harder for doctors to do surgery because they have to cut through the fat.
For some people, they can't help it, but for many it's PREVENTABLE.
That's why it's completely different from having special needs and comparing the two is offensive.
You can say the same about being xs and s or at the bottom of your BMI. It causes health related problems.
When did I say it didn't?
Jeez, it's so triggering for all of you to hear that ANYONE who is fat might bear some responsibility for it and might be suffering health consequences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a big difference between fat and healthy and obese and unhealthy.
I know larger size women and men that exercise regularly and while larger, they are not obese. They do not succumb to the fact that their genetic predisposition to being larger gives them any excuse to skip the gym and not eat healthy. They know they won’t ever be thin but they keep themselves from being obese. They are likely healthier than overly skinny members of society.
Then there is the other spectrum. Just stating “I’m fat, so deal with it”. Not exercising or eating healthy. They succumb to obesity. Their health is not good. They will have knee problems, back problems, heart problems, diabetes. They will be offended if anyone tells them they are at an unhealthy weight. They will act as if they have zero control over their fate of obesity and equate it with a disability.
The first group is what I would call body positive. The second group is not. Those that think they are body positive in the second group are delusional.
Was just about the post this when I saw the poster with two kids. There's a difference between being overweight and one that is morbidly obese. Yes, one's health is none of your business, but to tell a kid that being morbidly obese because of lifestyle choices is OK is just not right.
Why? What do you think will happen if we teach kids that being morbidly obese is ok?
What if your kid loves his obese preschool teacher, and you just say that you love her too without commenting on how shameful her body is? What if your kid has a beloved uncle who is morbidly obese, and you just talk about what a great uncle he is without ever commenting on his weight or what he should of shouldn’t eat? What if it is just ok? What horrible, terrible thing will happen?
They'll die early because of conditions directly correlated and primarily caused by being morbidly obese. Period. If that's fat shaming, then you're right I'm fat shaming and I'm not ashamed to shared that view. HAES is nonsense when you can objectively tell me being morbidly obese is "healthy".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a big difference between fat and healthy and obese and unhealthy.
I know larger size women and men that exercise regularly and while larger, they are not obese. They do not succumb to the fact that their genetic predisposition to being larger gives them any excuse to skip the gym and not eat healthy. They know they won’t ever be thin but they keep themselves from being obese. They are likely healthier than overly skinny members of society.
Then there is the other spectrum. Just stating “I’m fat, so deal with it”. Not exercising or eating healthy. They succumb to obesity. Their health is not good. They will have knee problems, back problems, heart problems, diabetes. They will be offended if anyone tells them they are at an unhealthy weight. They will act as if they have zero control over their fate of obesity and equate it with a disability.
The first group is what I would call body positive. The second group is not. Those that think they are body positive in the second group are delusional.
Was just about the post this when I saw the poster with two kids. There's a difference between being overweight and one that is morbidly obese. Yes, one's health is none of your business, but to tell a kid that being morbidly obese because of lifestyle choices is OK is just not right.
Why? What do you think will happen if we teach kids that being morbidly obese is ok?
What if your kid loves his obese preschool teacher, and you just say that you love her too without commenting on how shameful her body is? What if your kid has a beloved uncle who is morbidly obese, and you just talk about what a great uncle he is without ever commenting on his weight or what he should of shouldn’t eat? What if it is just ok? What horrible, terrible thing will happen?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I lost 60 pounds which makes me just 50 pounds overweight. I will likely never lose that other 50 pounds but I feel better, move more and look better in a smaller body. I had forgotten how it felt to try clothes on in a store and have them fit. To not feel like people were watching and judging me when I ate or tried to exercise. I did/do not love being fat. But it is unhealthy to hate my body, which gets me up every day and gets me around the world. I think the body positivity movement is about not hating your body and honoring what it can do.
This. I'm working on loving my body just so I *can* lose weight.
Body positivity is great. Healthy at every size is a fantasy. The OP asked about HAES.
I’m a registered dietitian in dc working in weight management and I think this sums it up perfectly
Maybe not every size but acting like a size 12, 14, 16 is unhealthy is incorrect.
The average size 12, 14, and 16 woman is overweight bordering obese. It is unhealthy. Sorry snowflake, science doesn’t agree with you.
Well that definitely depends on height...
Sure if you are 5 ft tall maybe. But calling those sizes large does not help or saying the are plus sized is ridiculous. That is literally body shaming. Just like if xs was called Skelton.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a complete fantasy that excess weight (and I mean more than 20 lbs overweight) causes zero health problems.
When you have more weight for your body to carry, it necessarily puts more pressure on your muscles and bones. At the extreme, it's harder for doctors to do surgery because they have to cut through the fat.
For some people, they can't help it, but for many it's PREVENTABLE.
That's why it's completely different from having special needs and comparing the two is offensive.
You can say the same about being xs and s or at the bottom of your BMI. It causes health related problems.
When did I say it didn't?
Jeez, it's so triggering for all of you to hear that ANYONE who is fat might bear some responsibility for it and might be suffering health consequences.
Not nearly as triggering as it is for some people to hear that there are fat people out there who still love themselves and are happy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a complete fantasy that excess weight (and I mean more than 20 lbs overweight) causes zero health problems.
When you have more weight for your body to carry, it necessarily puts more pressure on your muscles and bones. At the extreme, it's harder for doctors to do surgery because they have to cut through the fat.
For some people, they can't help it, but for many it's PREVENTABLE.
That's why it's completely different from having special needs and comparing the two is offensive.
You can say the same about being xs and s or at the bottom of your BMI. It causes health related problems.
When did I say it didn't?
Jeez, it's so triggering for all of you to hear that ANYONE who is fat might bear some responsibility for it and might be suffering health consequences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a complete fantasy that excess weight (and I mean more than 20 lbs overweight) causes zero health problems.
When you have more weight for your body to carry, it necessarily puts more pressure on your muscles and bones. At the extreme, it's harder for doctors to do surgery because they have to cut through the fat.
For some people, they can't help it, but for many it's PREVENTABLE.
That's why it's completely different from having special needs and comparing the two is offensive.
You can say the same about being xs and s or at the bottom of your BMI. It causes health related problems.
Anonymous wrote:It's a complete fantasy that excess weight (and I mean more than 20 lbs overweight) causes zero health problems.
When you have more weight for your body to carry, it necessarily puts more pressure on your muscles and bones. At the extreme, it's harder for doctors to do surgery because they have to cut through the fat.
For some people, they can't help it, but for many it's PREVENTABLE.
That's why it's completely different from having special needs and comparing the two is offensive.