Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is it with some white people and “community” schools?

Here's a little clue: Most people like community schools. Remember how the Hispanic community fought --and failed--to keep Graham Rd in their community?

I taught in a school where kids were bused. I've posted on here before about it. The people who were bused in from a school in their own community had difficulty getting to the school. If the kids missed the bus (which they frequently did) they were out of luck. Absenteeism was a result. Conferences were difficult. Parents usually didn't show. My class performed in a play--only a handful of parents came from that community. Open House--almost none.

Kids were sweet--though there was a lot of fighting. This is not the way to get family support--which is one of the most important factors in a child's education. Calling this "One Fairfax" won't help them. It will just cover up problems.

I see. So the status quo should prevail?

What do you mean by status quo? Things are changing in FCPS in terms of diversity regardless of whether there are community schools or widespread cross-county bussing (which is both impractical and beyond our means in any event).

Anonymous wrote:

Most seem to be in violent agreement that FCPS should move some of McLean to Langley and leave the Langley/Herndon boundaries alone unless and until there is a new high school. Not sure why that has to keep being repeated.

Anonymous wrote:

What do you mean by status quo? Things are changing in FCPS in terms of diversity regardless of whether there are community schools or widespread cross-county bussing (which is both impractical and beyond our means in any event).

If changing kids to a school based on no other reason than SES is changing the "status quo," then, yes. If splitting up neighborhoods and creating more split feeders means changing the "status quo," then yes.

I don't in Mt. Vernon/West Potomac area. Sounds to me like eliminating IB might help that situation if a lot of kids are PP.

As for Langley, it seems to me that some of McLean should be sent there. But, as for taking the GF kids, I don't think it makes sense as long as Herndon is full. Certainly, it makes more sense to have a community that wants to go there and is alleviating an overcrowded school by doing so, to remain. Use a little common sense. There is no other practical alternative.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is it with some white people and “community” schools?

Here's a little clue: Most people like community schools. Remember how the Hispanic community fought --and failed--to keep Graham Rd in their community?

I taught in a school where kids were bused. I've posted on here before about it. The people who were bused in from a school in their own community had difficulty getting to the school. If the kids missed the bus (which they frequently did) they were out of luck. Absenteeism was a result. Conferences were difficult. Parents usually didn't show. My class performed in a play--only a handful of parents came from that community. Open House--almost none.

Kids were sweet--though there was a lot of fighting. This is not the way to get family support--which is one of the most important factors in a child's education. Calling this "One Fairfax" won't help them. It will just cover up problems.

I see. So the status quo should prevail?

What do you mean by status quo? Things are changing in FCPS in terms of diversity regardless of whether there are community schools or widespread cross-county bussing (which is both impractical and beyond our means in any event).

If changing kids to a school based on no other reason than SES is changing the "status quo," then, yes. If splitting up neighborhoods and creating more split feeders means changing the "status quo," then yes.

What do you mean by status quo? Things are changing in FCPS in terms of diversity regardless of whether there are community schools or widespread cross-county bussing (which is both impractical and beyond our means in any event).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is it with some white people and “community” schools?

Here's a little clue: Most people like community schools. Remember how the Hispanic community fought --and failed--to keep Graham Rd in their community?

I taught in a school where kids were bused. I've posted on here before about it. The people who were bused in from a school in their own community had difficulty getting to the school. If the kids missed the bus (which they frequently did) they were out of luck. Absenteeism was a result. Conferences were difficult. Parents usually didn't show. My class performed in a play--only a handful of parents came from that community. Open House--almost none.

Kids were sweet--though there was a lot of fighting. This is not the way to get family support--which is one of the most important factors in a child's education. Calling this "One Fairfax" won't help them. It will just cover up problems.

I see. So the status quo should prevail?

Anonymous wrote:What is it with some white people and “community” schools?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is it with some white people and “community” schools?

Here's a little clue: Most people like community schools. Remember how the Hispanic community fought --and failed--to keep Graham Rd in their community?

I taught in a school where kids were bused. I've posted on here before about it. The people who were bused in from a school in their own community had difficulty getting to the school. If the kids missed the bus (which they frequently did) they were out of luck. Absenteeism was a result. Conferences were difficult. Parents usually didn't show. My class performed in a play--only a handful of parents came from that community. Open House--almost none.

Kids were sweet--though there was a lot of fighting. This is not the way to get family support--which is one of the most important factors in a child's education. Calling this "One Fairfax" won't help them. It will just cover up problems.

Anonymous wrote:What is it with some white people and “community” schools?

This is not my understanding. If a student needs more intensive special ed supports than what's available TJ, he can't attend regardless of intellectual ability.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Why does every thread in this forum turn into a thread about TJ?


Because the lack of underrepresented minorities is unconscionable, correct?


...and what about students with disabilities who have the academic chops to get into TJ, but need the support an IEP or 504 provides? Does anyone have numbers on those students?

Legally, TJ would not be able to turn away the type of student you are describing above.

This is not my understanding. If a student needs more intensive special ed supports than what's available TJ, he can't attend regardless of intellectual ability.