Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well you aren't a genius that's for sure. The younger, sexy woman who wants to marry you for your money isn't going to think a pre-nup is a great return on her "investment."

Seriously. If you need a pre-nup then by definition you are NOT "fine with it".

I don't understand what you have written. I'm totally fine with a hot young thing wanting to marry my rich old ass. I'm not fine with her investing just a year or two in order to reap a cash windfall I've worked for since long before she was born. Of course I want a pre-nup and if she is serious about her love for my saggy balls, she should be fine with that.

Anonymous wrote:Well you aren't a genius that's for sure. The younger, sexy woman who wants to marry you for your money isn't going to think a pre-nup is a great return on her "investment."

I really am a genius and this is nothing new. The pre-nup would be pro-rated, like a marriage warranty in reverse. We divorce our first year, she gets almost nothing and it's a sliding scale after that through 20 years. You want the big payout, stick around until I'm dead.

There is a certain level of wealth and a lifestyle that comes with it that is probably unfathomable to most of you. You may think you have an idea of it and what it's like from watching TV or movies, but until you've truly been exposed to it and can see first-hand what it's like to live at such a level and everything that comes with it, it's probably very difficult to truly know what you would do if you had the opportunity to marry into that lifestyle, especially if single and unattached.

I am not implying everyone would sacrifice principles just to marry well. And not everyone wants to be loaded or cares about the lifestyle. But it's easier to take the higher road when you don't have the choice.

If that’s the criteria, then how is it much different than prostitution?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t agree. I think there is a difference between wanting the person to bring similar things that you bring to the relationship aka equal versus a trade/compromise or boxing. If an attractive person wanted to be with someone equally attractive or an employed person wants to be with someone equally employed no one bats an eye. Also, if it’s the thread I remember, most women said the guy had to be hard working and/or ambitious, and not a spend thrift, not that he had to make a specific amount. IRL a know a couple that met in high school at a job. They both went on to college and started a business together - doing quite well now but they met when they both made very little.

But why should the women care if the husband makes a similar amount as she does? She has an income/salary/income potential requirement, it's just not as high as someone trying to marry rich.
Even the women marrying the older rich guy is not marrying solely for money. If they guy was abusive, a total jerk, etc. she probably would not marry him. The fact that he has money means she may be willing to compromise on other things (e.g. age, looks, etc.).

How is expecting someone to be able to support him/he self an income requirement? I would call that adulting. But back to the original question. It’s not if a woman would marry a much older guy for his money - it’s if the older guy is either deluding himself or doesn’t mind being married for his money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of you are really underestimating how emotionally attractive a powerful person can be to a female. I say “person” because girls/women also tend to kiss the evil queen bee’s ass.

Ps: I’m obviously generalizing.

-Female, not into older guys.

Me again. I should have said “not into RICH older guys”.

I bet you would enjoy the attention from a rich(like does not work rich) old guy and the perks that go with it. He flies you out to LA for the 4th of July weekend. You walk into the shops at Rodeo Drive and everyone makes a big deal of you. You pick what you like and they carry your new Hermes bags, 5 pair of Louboutin and earring from Harry Winston to your waiting Bugatti Chiron....and it’s 11 am on Friday because you know...you do not have to work. Now you can continue to live like this or go back to your job on Monday. What would it be?

I would definitely go back to my job on Monday. Absolutely.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of you are really underestimating how emotionally attractive a powerful person can be to a female. I say “person” because girls/women also tend to kiss the evil queen bee’s ass.

Ps: I’m obviously generalizing.

-Female, not into older guys.

Me again. I should have said “not into RICH older guys”.

I bet you would enjoy the attention from a rich(like does not work rich) old guy and the perks that go with it. He flies you out to LA for the 4th of July weekend. You walk into the shops at Rodeo Drive and everyone makes a big deal of you. You pick what you like and they carry your new Hermes bags, 5 pair of Louboutin and earring from Harry Winston to your waiting Bugatti Chiron....and it’s 11 am on Friday because you know...you do not have to work. Now you can continue to live like this or go back to your job on Monday. What would it be?

I’d never make it on to the plane to LA in the first place. I have a body horror thing with being touched sexually by someone I have no attraction to. Makes me physically ill just thinking of it.

Anonymous wrote:Like Adam Sandler said, “You'll be missing me when you have that big white wrinkly body on top of you with his loose skin and old balls...“

Big Daddy!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of you are really underestimating how emotionally attractive a powerful person can be to a female. I say “person” because girls/women also tend to kiss the evil queen bee’s ass.

Ps: I’m obviously generalizing.

-Female, not into older guys.

Me again. I should have said “not into RICH older guys”.

I bet you would enjoy the attention from a rich(like does not work rich) old guy and the perks that go with it. He flies you out to LA for the 4th of July weekend. You walk into the shops at Rodeo Drive and everyone makes a big deal of you. You pick what you like and they carry your new Hermes bags, 5 pair of Louboutin and earring from Harry Winston to your waiting Bugatti Chiron....and it’s 11 am on Friday because you know...you do not have to work. Now you can continue to live like this or go back to your job on Monday. What would it be?

It seems like I’ve been thinking about this problem all wrong. Do you think a 47 year old man has a chance of bagging one of these guys? I mean, I’m fit, funny, handy around the house, etc. It sure would be nice to just stay home on Monday.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of you are really underestimating how emotionally attractive a powerful person can be to a female. I say “person” because girls/women also tend to kiss the evil queen bee’s ass.

Ps: I’m obviously generalizing.

-Female, not into older guys.

Me again. I should have said “not into RICH older guys”.

I bet you would enjoy the attention from a rich(like does not work rich) old guy and the perks that go with it. He flies you out to LA for the 4th of July weekend. You walk into the shops at Rodeo Drive and everyone makes a big deal of you. You pick what you like and they carry your new Hermes bags, 5 pair of Louboutin and earring from Harry Winston to your waiting Bugatti Chiron....and it’s 11 am on Friday because you know...you do not have to work. Now you can continue to live like this or go back to your job on Monday. What would it be?