Anonymous wrote:I agree there is far more to this story. The handcuffs are inappropriate but we don't know how out of control the situation was. Some of her comments were very dismissive of her child's behavior which makes me wonder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am sure that the ratio of bullying of Special Needs students by non-Special Needs students at Churchill is much higher than the other way around. Students can be cruel from teasing students about the attributes of their disabilities (ie. how they talk or walk), excluding kids from groups for lunch, Homecoming, or Prom, to calling them names like retard, Special Eddie, or Sped. Before you think mainstreaming is hard on your child without disabilities, take a moment to think about how hard high school (let alone a high school like Churchill) is for children with visible differences and challenges.
Ok so since some SN kids are bullied that means that they should be allowed to threaten the health and safety of the NT kids? Aren’t the NT kids equally entitled to a proper education as well?
Anonymous wrote:I am sure that the ratio of bullying of Special Needs students by non-Special Needs students at Churchill is much higher than the other way around. Students can be cruel from teasing students about the attributes of their disabilities (ie. how they talk or walk), excluding kids from groups for lunch, Homecoming, or Prom, to calling them names like retard, Special Eddie, or Sped. Before you think mainstreaming is hard on your child without disabilities, take a moment to think about how hard high school (let alone a high school like Churchill) is for children with visible differences and challenges.
Anonymous wrote:For anyone interested, here is the Introduction from a scholarly article in Science Daily. No one wants their child to be victimized. It isn’t a contest who gets harassed more than another. The point is to get MCPS to provide the right resources and placements for kids with disabilities. They don’t always do that.
Bullying rates remain higher for children with disabilities, even as they mature
Schools should refocus efforts to help these children develop social skills to combat bullying in more positive ways
Date:
November 28, 2016
Source:
University of Missouri-Columbia
Summary:
More than 22 percent of children ages 12-18 say they have been bullied in school within the last month; a significant portion of those children have disabilities. However, little research exists on how bullying rates for individual children change over time. Now, a researcher and bullying expert has determined that children with disabilities are victimized by bullying at a much higher rate over time than their peers without disabilities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am sure that the ratio of bullying of Special Needs students by non-Special Needs students at Churchill is much higher than the other way around. Students can be cruel from teasing students about the attributes of their disabilities (ie. how they talk or walk), excluding kids from groups for lunch, Homecoming, or Prom, to calling them names like retard, Special Eddie, or Sped. Before you think mainstreaming is hard on your child without disabilities, take a moment to think about how hard high school (let alone a high school like Churchill) is for children with visible differences and challenges.
Sorry, it's the precise opposite.
Show us the evidence that it's "the precise opposite."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am sure that the ratio of bullying of Special Needs students by non-Special Needs students at Churchill is much higher than the other way around. Students can be cruel from teasing students about the attributes of their disabilities (ie. how they talk or walk), excluding kids from groups for lunch, Homecoming, or Prom, to calling them names like retard, Special Eddie, or Sped. Before you think mainstreaming is hard on your child without disabilities, take a moment to think about how hard high school (let alone a high school like Churchill) is for children with visible differences and challenges.
Sorry, it's the precise opposite.
Anonymous wrote:I am sure that the ratio of bullying of Special Needs students by non-Special Needs students at Churchill is much higher than the other way around. Students can be cruel from teasing students about the attributes of their disabilities (ie. how they talk or walk), excluding kids from groups for lunch, Homecoming, or Prom, to calling them names like retard, Special Eddie, or Sped. Before you think mainstreaming is hard on your child without disabilities, take a moment to think about how hard high school (let alone a high school like Churchill) is for children with visible differences and challenges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Show me some evidence that it does work? What i know is that one more than one occasion my children have been assaulted and once sexually harassed by mainstreamed kids. In both cases they did not learn empathy, they learned that there are no consequences for the SN kids and that they just have to take it.
If your child was assaulted or sexually harassed, did you fill out the Bullying, Harassment, and Intimidation Form to report the incidents? Formally reporting incidents creates a record so the behavior is addressed. For Special Needs students, the report should be considered by the school’s IEP team to develop a plan to improve the student behavior.
For any student, if no one takes the time to submit the paperwork then the behavior goes unaddressed. BTW my child was attacked in a stairwell at Churchill this year and the students were not Special Needs as far as my child knows. They were just a group of bullies who thought they would have the advantage of 4 kids against 1.
Anonymous wrote:Show me some evidence that it does work? What i know is that one more than one occasion my children have been assaulted and once sexually harassed by mainstreamed kids. In both cases they did not learn empathy, they learned that there are no consequences for the SN kids and that they just have to take it.
Anonymous wrote:Show me some evidence that it does work? What i know is that one more than one occasion my children have been assaulted and once sexually harassed by mainstreamed kids. In both cases they did not learn empathy, they learned that there are no consequences for the SN kids and that they just have to take it.