Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How old? Who is she going to see?
11 yrs. he wants to take her on half of his vacation with his (childless therefor clueless about children- sorry) new wife. I’m so angry he’s be such an idiot in regards to his parenting responsibilities, I’m shaking. He’s generally a blue ribbon, horrible jerk but even for him, this was a shock to me.
11 is not “young daughter”...she is a tween. Your jealousy is showing. How does DD feel about the flight? What other steps to independence does she take...ride the bus? Sleep away camp?
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So why not let them have the girls for the entire trip. That will be a great experience for them. It sounds like you are more angry that the ex got married and they do these things than what is best for the kids. Find a compromise.
What makes you think the ex and his wife want to have the two children for time beyond the vacation? Wouldn’t the ex have offered that as an option? Instead he wants to send the girls home on a flight alone so that he and is new wife can continue vacationing in Asia without children.
This is the impression i got too. I don;t know why everyone is assuming OP just won't let he ex have the kids. I think she would be fine if they were flying round trip with the ex. I also think the answer to this question depends on the maturity and experience of the kids. Sounds like they are not very experienced travelers. OP, in your shoes, I would also say no.
OP is saying no to any travel. She'd probably say no even if Dad or stepmom flew both ways with the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How old? Who is she going to see?
11 yrs. he wants to take her on half of his vacation with his (childless therefor clueless about children- sorry) new wife. I’m so angry he’s be such an idiot in regards to his parenting responsibilities, I’m shaking. He’s generally a blue ribbon, horrible jerk but even for him, this was a shock to me.
11 is not “young daughter”...she is a tween. Your jealousy is showing. How does DD feel about the flight? What other steps to independence does she take...ride the bus? Sleep away camp?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would not. I’ve recently flown two long haul flights and would not think it appropriate for a young unaccompanied female passenger. The flight attendants have many duties on long flights like that and even if you pay an unaccompanied minor fee that does not mean they will keep eyes on for the whole flight. It’s dark, people sleep, people roam around, people drink too much. If your daughter has experience doing this kind of solo travel on long flights and is mature and has good judgment then maybe but I personally would not. He can either send you a ticket too so you can bring her or they can plan a different trip together. Or he can fly back himself to get her.
Its a bit ironic that all these parents who probably minimally supervise at home are concerned about a plane ride. Its absurd. OP probably would not let the kids go even if Dad came and got them,
We have friend's daughters who regularly fly cross country alone to see us. Never been an issue.
Cross county is NOT the same as long haul transpacific.
For these purposes, what's the difference? Is it only the length of the flight?
Hey, can you tell us how many young unaccompanied minors you saw on that flight and how they fared?
The fact you are asking this suggests you have never flown long haul Trans-Pacific, even as an adult.
I have, within the last six months.
So, other than the length of the flight, what's the difference?
Anonymous wrote:There must be several bitter step moms here. I see no other way to explain the bizarre attacking of OP for sanely forbidding her ex from sending two elementary girls that have rarely flown before solo across the pacific. You people that think this is fine are nutso.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So why not let them have the girls for the entire trip. That will be a great experience for them. It sounds like you are more angry that the ex got married and they do these things than what is best for the kids. Find a compromise.
What makes you think the ex and his wife want to have the two children for time beyond the vacation? Wouldn’t the ex have offered that as an option? Instead he wants to send the girls home on a flight alone so that he and is new wife can continue vacationing in Asia without children.
This is the impression i got too. I don;t know why everyone is assuming OP just won't let he ex have the kids. I think she would be fine if they were flying round trip with the ex. I also think the answer to this question depends on the maturity and experience of the kids. Sounds like they are not very experienced travelers. OP, in your shoes, I would also say no.
OP is saying no to any travel. She'd probably say no even if Dad or stepmom flew both ways with the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So why not let them have the girls for the entire trip. That will be a great experience for them. It sounds like you are more angry that the ex got married and they do these things than what is best for the kids. Find a compromise.
What makes you think the ex and his wife want to have the two children for time beyond the vacation? Wouldn’t the ex have offered that as an option? Instead he wants to send the girls home on a flight alone so that he and is new wife can continue vacationing in Asia without children.
This is the impression i got too. I don;t know why everyone is assuming OP just won't let he ex have the kids. I think she would be fine if they were flying round trip with the ex. I also think the answer to this question depends on the maturity and experience of the kids. Sounds like they are not very experienced travelers. OP, in your shoes, I would also say no.
Anonymous wrote:At 9 and 11, and with no prior experience flying alone, I'd be inclined to say no, too. That is a long flight for kids who haven't done anything like that before, and 11 is too young to be responsible for the 9-year-old, especially if something unexpected happens.
The fact that it's back to the US would help, though. I'd look at the airline's UM policy to find out exactly what services are provided, including whether their father would have to wait at the departure gate with them until the plane takes off, whether someone physically walks with them through customs and baggage claim, and ensures that they are reunited with me. But again, I'd be inclined to say no. If they were more used to air travel, and had successfully taken a shorter flight as UM before, that would be different.
Anonymous wrote:Note an 11 year old flies as an unaccompanied minor. They're not going to lose their passport because the flight crew holds it for them, and they arne't going to get confused in immigration, because the staff will escort them the entire way until an adult shows up to collect them. This is different from sending your MIL on a flight -- she's an adult and doesn't get that special treatment.
Some airlines have a policy that a UM can't be seated next to a male traveling alone.
Anonymous wrote:For those responding...do you take long haul flights internationally several times a year? Ever done one from Asia? I do and have. The last one was 3 weeks ago. I don’t really understand all the fear around a long-haul flight. I find the customer service in Asia to be far superior to that of the U.S.