Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So much couture that she's twinning with an 86-year-old. How embarrassing.



https://www.hellomagazine.com/fashion/royal-style/2019052173268/kate-middleton-wears-same-dress-duchess-of-kent/

Nicer shoes, better cuffline, NO LACE, thin belt, and a confident look was all it took to take this from Laura Ingalls Wilder to modern royal.

Anonymous wrote:So much couture that she's twinning with an 86-year-old. How embarrassing.



https://www.hellomagazine.com/fashion/royal-style/2019052173268/kate-middleton-wears-same-dress-duchess-of-kent/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the dresses are beautiful.

Especially compared to the "American" dresses someone just posted above. Just goes to show, taste differs...

Yep... some ppl like a matronly and unstylish look.

I mean, you can keep saying these women are not stylish but they are designers and literally make style. Maybe you are a designed too, I don't know. But I kind of do know and would guess I'm accurate that you are not.

I mean, a designer designed mom jeans, shoulder pads, culottes, Ugg's, Birkenstock’s, etc. They literally made style. Does that mean it looks good? Does everything a designer makes look good? You can try to justify these horrible and matronly frocks so you can think you are stylish, but, well you aren’t.

Ha!! Hahaha!! This is a sad post. I am quite sure you put more into trying to be stylish than I do, that's for sure.

Says the person who likes matronly frocks.

It’s not a secret that you obviously have no style. It also wouldn’t be hard to be stylish next to those frocks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the dresses are beautiful.

Especially compared to the "American" dresses someone just posted above. Just goes to show, taste differs...

Yep... some ppl like a matronly and unstylish look.

I mean, you can keep saying these women are not stylish but they are designers and literally make style. Maybe you are a designed too, I don't know. But I kind of do know and would guess I'm accurate that you are not.

I mean, a designer designed mom jeans, shoulder pads, culottes, Ugg's, Birkenstock’s, etc. They literally made style. Does that mean it looks good? Does everything a designer makes look good? You can try to justify these horrible and matronly frocks so you can think you are stylish, but, well you aren’t.

Ha!! Hahaha!! This is a sad post. I am quite sure you put more into trying to be stylish than I do, that's for sure.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the dresses are beautiful.

Especially compared to the "American" dresses someone just posted above. Just goes to show, taste differs...

Yep... some ppl like a matronly and unstylish look.

I mean, you can keep saying these women are not stylish but they are designers and literally make style. Maybe you are a designed too, I don't know. But I kind of do know and would guess I'm accurate that you are not.

I mean, a designer designed mom jeans, shoulder pads, culottes, Ugg's, Birkenstock’s, etc. They literally made style. Does that mean it looks good? Does everything a designer makes look good? You can try to justify these horrible and matronly frocks so you can think you are stylish, but, well you aren’t.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those aren't bridesmaids, she had baby bridesmaids per tradition (which I honestly prefer to telling your friends what to wear).

Princes Michael of Kent and Prince Michael look fabulous.