Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She looks good for 70 but to claim she looks like she is in her 30s is bizarre.
+1
She looks about 10 years younger--tops. I'd give her 60---which is amazing, btw!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She looks good for 70 but to claim she looks like she is in her 30s is bizarre.
+1
She looks about 10 years younger--tops. I'd give her 60---which is amazing, btw!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She looks good for 70 but to claim she looks like she is in her 30s is bizarre.
+1
She looks about 10 years younger--tops. I'd give her 60---which is amazing, btw!
Anonymous wrote:She looks good for 70 but to claim she looks like she is in her 30s is bizarre.
Anonymous wrote:Elizabeth Warren is aging beautifully. I've met her a couple of times and I can assure you she glows in person even with very little makeup. Her skin and her neck are insane. It's tempting to think she's had work done, but up close, it really just looks like good genes to me.
Besides, her youthfulness is beyond her great skin. You can't buy that kind of energy. When she walks into the room her eyes are engaged and sparkling and she has a child-like excitement that's very refreshing. That woman's got a fire in her belly that makes her ageless. And her neck is insane.
Oh, and can we talk about how much she looks like Annette Bening? Or is that for another thread?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Compared to law school 30 years ago, she's definitely aged.
You went to law school with her or you attended Harvard?
Anonymous wrote:She was my professor 11 years ago in law school and she looks good but not that young! She did wear the exact same thing.
Anonymous wrote:She looks good for 70 but to claim she looks like she is in her 30s is bizarre.
Anonymous wrote:I am a supporter and don't want to trivialize her candidacy, but she looks INCREDIBLE for not just her age - ANY age. She looks 30 years younger than her age. Is she a runner? What are her secrets? I also love that she wears a "uniform." Black base + colored jacket. I'm a professor too and, to be honest, we all support her but then we comment on how amazing and vibrant she looks. What are the secrets?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You folks that think she looks her age are NUTS! Her
skin is perfect...not a line around her mouth or eyes.
Her skin is luminous. If she doesn't win, she should
start a skincare line. She would make millions.
She looks good, great even. But this is why everyone on DCUM thinks they have "NO WRINKLES!" at like 60 and is delusional. She has, many, many lines on her face. As she should at her age, but acting like they're not there is just ridiculous. She also has gone on record as saying the only product she uses, at all, is Ponds Cold Cream, so good luck with that skincare line; however you evaluate her skin, seems like it is genetics straight up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both of you above are being obnoxious and dense. It’s not about her overall image, just look at her skin.
She has a ton of wrinkles around her eyes and some around her mouth. If this is your idea of good skin, I’m guessing you are extremely old (60+) and look it.
So many mean and negative people in the beauty forum lately. Beauty begins on the inside, darling.
Go start your own forum then because this one is for physical appearances.
Anonymous wrote:You folks that think she looks her age are NUTS! Her
skin is perfect...not a line around her mouth or eyes.
Her skin is luminous. If she doesn't win, she should
start a skincare line. She would make millions.
