Anonymous wrote:We have had 2 mayors, 3 DMEs, 3 chancellors and god knows how many Council members since the last boundary review, when Shaw middle school was promised, post closure.
Sometimes stuff changes and changes quickly. The people at DCPS and DGS are largely cogs in the wheel trying to keep up.
Save Shaw would be able to apply more pressure if they had a viable demand. As seen from this weeks oversight hearings their leverage is minimal.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Save Shaw folks are preoccupied with having been wronged. Prevents them from talking about any other solution than clawing the Shaw site back from Banneker. It’s a shame because a lot of effort has been wasted on a hopeless cause.
I think it is about time downtown and the mayor's office faced some blowback for their habit of treating families and schools like crap. Hopefully this results in some real improvements at Cardozo. But that is the compromise result and Save Shaw should keep the pressure on, not fold.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of times, if you want someone to change, you have to make them uncomfortable. Pointing out the reasons why there is a lack of trust made the DCPS people very uncomfortable- it was obvious. Pointing out the conflict of interest for one of the members of the team was totally appropriate and reasonable. So perhaps some nuggets got through to them. Perhaps they will think twice and/or change something about their ways.
That being said, I do agree that the constant pivot to mistrust, wrongdoings, conspiracy, etc, could derail any actual progress. Some of the problems that are occurring are so systemic, and above DCPS. Discussing potential FOIA conspiracies will not get solved in one community meeting about Middle Schools. It is important to think about the right time and place to make the arguments, the right person to drag through the coals for the right thing, etc. You cant throw every possible argument at the wall and hope one sticks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getting engaged and being heard does not mean getting what you want. I have seen some movement on this issue- it hasn’t been much and not nearly enough for most people, but I do think the engagement is working. Keep trying, keep engaging, keep getting your voice heard. But remember that successful engagement doesn’t necessarily mean only one thing.
I agree but I do expect to be treated with honesty and good faith. Downtown and the mayor's office are fillijg this process with their usual lies and incompetence.
With that sort of disdain and attitude toward them, you are surprised you have no support from elected officials or the government?
I get it. It feels personal to you. It isn’t. It is their job and they have more stakeholders to manage than you realize. Treat this as a business discussion and atop the angry live tweeting (to your 200 followers) and personal attacks.
I'm not the person with that account (or any twitter account at all) and I don't know why you would think I am. More than one person can believe them to be dishonest and in bad faith. It is not personal to me, but it is wrong and it is having bad results.
The acct represents the Save Shaw group. No one said you were responsible for it personally. But publicly calling people who disagree with you and your neighbors liars, repeated, isn’t going to work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getting engaged and being heard does not mean getting what you want. I have seen some movement on this issue- it hasn’t been much and not nearly enough for most people, but I do think the engagement is working. Keep trying, keep engaging, keep getting your voice heard. But remember that successful engagement doesn’t necessarily mean only one thing.
I agree but I do expect to be treated with honesty and good faith. Downtown and the mayor's office are fillijg this process with their usual lies and incompetence.
With that sort of disdain and attitude toward them, you are surprised you have no support from elected officials or the government?
I get it. It feels personal to you. It isn’t. It is their job and they have more stakeholders to manage than you realize. Treat this as a business discussion and atop the angry live tweeting (to your 200 followers) and personal attacks.
I'm not the person with that account (or any twitter account at all) and I don't know why you would think I am. More than one person can believe them to be dishonest and in bad faith. It is not personal to me, but it is wrong and it is having bad results.
Anonymous wrote:The Save Shaw folks are preoccupied with having been wronged. Prevents them from talking about any other solution than clawing the Shaw site back from Banneker. It’s a shame because a lot of effort has been wasted on a hopeless cause.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getting engaged and being heard does not mean getting what you want. I have seen some movement on this issue- it hasn’t been much and not nearly enough for most people, but I do think the engagement is working. Keep trying, keep engaging, keep getting your voice heard. But remember that successful engagement doesn’t necessarily mean only one thing.
I agree but I do expect to be treated with honesty and good faith. Downtown and the mayor's office are fillijg this process with their usual lies and incompetence.
With that sort of disdain and attitude toward them, you are surprised you have no support from elected officials or the government?
I get it. It feels personal to you. It isn’t. It is their job and they have more stakeholders to manage than you realize. Treat this as a business discussion and atop the angry live tweeting (to your 200 followers) and personal attacks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Getting engaged and being heard does not mean getting what you want. I have seen some movement on this issue- it hasn’t been much and not nearly enough for most people, but I do think the engagement is working. Keep trying, keep engaging, keep getting your voice heard. But remember that successful engagement doesn’t necessarily mean only one thing.
I agree but I do expect to be treated with honesty and good faith. Downtown and the mayor's office are fillijg this process with their usual lies and incompetence.
Anonymous wrote:Getting engaged and being heard does not mean getting what you want. I have seen some movement on this issue- it hasn’t been much and not nearly enough for most people, but I do think the engagement is working. Keep trying, keep engaging, keep getting your voice heard. But remember that successful engagement doesn’t necessarily mean only one thing.