Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For top 10 schools almost everyone is in the range but few get in. That’s why we have so many angry posters on this forum. Being in the range is not enough for most kids at a top 10.
In my 25 years in education, I've never seen a genuinely impressive kid get rejected from all of the top 15 (Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Hopkins, Duke, Chicago, Northwestern, Vandy), let alone the top 30 (Georgetown, UCLA, USC, UVa, Michigan). The pissed off parents have kids who are just not that impressive; they're largely just bullsh*t artists with striver bullsh*t artist parents who think their sort of lazy snowflake is entitled to 1 of ~ 30,000 top 15 freshman seats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For top 10 schools almost everyone is in the range but few get in. That’s why we have so many angry posters on this forum. Being in the range is not enough for most kids at a top 10.
In my 25 years in education, I've never seen a genuinely impressive kid get rejected from all of the top 15 (Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Hopkins, Duke, Chicago, Northwestern, Vandy), let alone the top 30 (Georgetown, UCLA, USC, UVa, Michigan). The pissed off parents have kids who are just not that impressive; they're largely just bullsh*t artists with striver bullsh*t artist parents who think their sort of lazy snowflake is entitled to 1 of ~ 30,000 top 15 freshman seats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For top 10 schools almost everyone is in the range but few get in. That’s why we have so many angry posters on this forum. Being in the range is not enough for most kids at a top 10.
In my 25 years in education, I've never seen a genuinely impressive kid get rejected from all of the top 15 (Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Hopkins, Duke, Chicago, Northwestern, Vandy), let alone the top 30 (Georgetown, UCLA, USC, UVa, Michigan). The pissed off parents have kids who are just not that impressive; they're largely just bullsh*t artists with striver bullsh*t artist parents who think their sort of lazy snowflake is entitled to 1 of ~ 30,000 top 15 freshman seats.
Anonymous wrote:Your kid wants to party and get laid in college. There I helped articulate that for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For top 10 schools almost everyone is in the range but few get in. That’s why we have so many angry posters on this forum. Being in the range is not enough for most kids at a top 10.
In my 25 years in education, I've never seen a genuinely impressive kid get rejected from all of the top 15 (Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Hopkins, Duke, Chicago, Northwestern, Vandy), let alone the top 30 (Georgetown, UCLA, USC, UVa, Michigan). The pissed off parents have kids who are just not that impressive; they're largely just bullsh*t artists with striver bullsh*t artist parents who think their sort of lazy snowflake is entitled to 1 of ~ 30,000 top 15 freshman seats.
Anonymous wrote:OP -
I can't tell you a damned thing about those expensive consultants who get kids into ivy league schools.
I can tell you about our experience. I paid a reasonable sum to have a person functioning as a competent guidance counselor because our school did not provide competence there.
The consultant helped our child articulate what he wanted from college, and helped us tell engineering schools apart (it is actually more complicated than I would have thought
and rank between 10 and 50 really doesn't matter). My kid was able to make judgments about where to apply and then where to go that was based on real characteristics about the educational environment, and not whether or not there was a beautiful gym, a chick-fil-A on campus, or any other stupid things.
My son wrote his own essay. They did talk about it, and he got some feedback, but all good writers get feedback.
Anonymous wrote:For top 10 schools almost everyone is in the range but few get in. That’s why we have so many angry posters on this forum. Being in the range is not enough for most kids at a top 10.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC may have gotten into his dream school without the consultant, but I do believe some of the advice we got from her was valuable and helped us tip the scale in his favor.
Some of the advice she gave us:
Each year we looked at course selections and advised on best course load to demonstrate rigor. Coming from her vs. us (his parents) made an impact and he was much more open to listening to her advice vs. having us try to guide him.
She helped us navigate getting accommodations for the ACT (we already had them for college board). With ACT, you have to actually register for the test before you request accommodations. We registered even though we knew he wouldn't take the test on that day (he wouldn't be ready) and requested accommodations. Then we rescheduled the date once we got the accommodations. This way, he knew how he should prep for the test based on the accommodations he was given. It was a one and done and he scored quite high.
She got us hooked up with an excellent tutor for test prep that was in our price range (only $150 per hour) and came to the house.
She provided him with checklists and deadlines of things to complete, i.e. send ACT scores to schools, have draft of supplemental essay done by this date, complete this section of common app by this date, etc. It provided structure to the process and we were able to be more hands off.
She helped him brainstorm ideas for essays and guided him toward the best approach, subjects to pursue. She proofread essays for punctuation/typos. She did not adjust content, other than to suggest taking out or adding concepts...but no actually editing.
She helped narrow down a list of colleges.
He made out quite well...got into a top 20 which was his first choice. He didn't want any ivies.
Gee, you should have asked me what courses your kid should have taken to demonstrate rigor. I bet I'd charge you a lot less than your consultant did!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We had a great experience with our college consultant - so OP I disagree that it was a waste of money.
We did, too. It was not a huge amount of money, and it was aimed at matching our kid rather than getting him in where he didn't belong.
I also thought it was a great way to protect my kid from my anxiety.
A child going to college should be able to handle the anxiety of applying to college.
And you cant read. He could handle his anxiety. I didnt think he should have to handle MY anxiety. And I stand by that.
Don’t sweat the keyboard judges here. They just need someone to attack. I thought it was honest and funny.
Anonymous wrote:My DC may have gotten into his dream school without the consultant, but I do believe some of the advice we got from her was valuable and helped us tip the scale in his favor.
Some of the advice she gave us:
Each year we looked at course selections and advised on best course load to demonstrate rigor. Coming from her vs. us (his parents) made an impact and he was much more open to listening to her advice vs. having us try to guide him.
She helped us navigate getting accommodations for the ACT (we already had them for college board). With ACT, you have to actually register for the test before you request accommodations. We registered even though we knew he wouldn't take the test on that day (he wouldn't be ready) and requested accommodations. Then we rescheduled the date once we got the accommodations. This way, he knew how he should prep for the test based on the accommodations he was given. It was a one and done and he scored quite high.
She got us hooked up with an excellent tutor for test prep that was in our price range (only $150 per hour) and came to the house.
She provided him with checklists and deadlines of things to complete, i.e. send ACT scores to schools, have draft of supplemental essay done by this date, complete this section of common app by this date, etc. It provided structure to the process and we were able to be more hands off.
She helped him brainstorm ideas for essays and guided him toward the best approach, subjects to pursue. She proofread essays for punctuation/typos. She did not adjust content, other than to suggest taking out or adding concepts...but no actually editing.
She helped narrow down a list of colleges.
He made out quite well...got into a top 20 which was his first choice. He didn't want any ivies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC may have gotten into his dream school without the consultant, but I do believe some of the advice we got from her was valuable and helped us tip the scale in his favor.
Some of the advice she gave us:
Each year we looked at course selections and advised on best course load to demonstrate rigor. Coming from her vs. us (his parents) made an impact and he was much more open to listening to her advice vs. having us try to guide him.
She helped us navigate getting accommodations for the ACT (we already had them for college board). With ACT, you have to actually register for the test before you request accommodations. We registered even though we knew he wouldn't take the test on that day (he wouldn't be ready) and requested accommodations. Then we rescheduled the date once we got the accommodations. This way, he knew how he should prep for the test based on the accommodations he was given. It was a one and done and he scored quite high.
She got us hooked up with an excellent tutor for test prep that was in our price range (only $150 per hour) and came to the house.
She provided him with checklists and deadlines of things to complete, i.e. send ACT scores to schools, have draft of supplemental essay done by this date, complete this section of common app by this date, etc. It provided structure to the process and we were able to be more hands off.
She helped him brainstorm ideas for essays and guided him toward the best approach, subjects to pursue. She proofread essays for punctuation/typos. She did not adjust content, other than to suggest taking out or adding concepts...but no actually editing.
She helped narrow down a list of colleges.
He made out quite well...got into a top 20 which was his first choice. He didn't want any ivies.
Except for the last two items (narrowing down essay topics and selecting a list of colleges), everything else you describe sounds like a disservice to your kid's development in the long run. Applying to colleges is one of the more complicated things a 17 year old does in their life, but tracking deadlines etc is a healthy way to build responsibility and an important part of preparing for the degree of independence one needs to be a college student. Same with choosing courses and studying for tests (though test prep has been around forever, so I guess that's just the way things are these days).