Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about UVA vs. Berkeley? Both good schools (don't know their exact rankings). Would folks really argue that equivalent experiences could be had at both places?
I think this just goes to show it highly depends on the schools in question.
I think if I had a techy kid, then I might consider Berkeley because of its location and its strengths in fields like comp sci and certain engineering fields. But for a generic psychology or business or English major who wants to go there just purely because they’d rather spend four years in Berkeley than Charlottesville? Hell no, what a waste of money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pitt and UMD are both good schools; I would consider them academic peers. I certainly wouldn’t pay extra just so my kid could go hang out in Pittsburgh for four years instead of College Park. That’s just crazy to me. If living in Pittsburgh was that important to my kid, she can take the money she saved by going to Maryland and move to Pittsburgh after graduation.
My kid’s merit scholarship from Pitt makes it cost about the same as UMD-CP for us. We like Pitt much better.
I agree they are academic peers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about UVA vs. Berkeley? Both good schools (don't know their exact rankings). Would folks really argue that equivalent experiences could be had at both places?
I think this just goes to show it highly depends on the schools in question.
I think if I had a techy kid, then I might consider Berkeley because of its location and its strengths in fields like comp sci and certain engineering fields. But for a generic psychology or business or English major who wants to go there just purely because they’d rather spend four years in Berkeley than Charlottesville? Hell no, what a waste of money.
Anonymous wrote:What about UVA vs. Berkeley? Both good schools (don't know their exact rankings). Would folks really argue that equivalent experiences could be had at both places?
I think this just goes to show it highly depends on the schools in question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pitt and UMD are both good schools; I would consider them academic peers. I certainly wouldn’t pay extra just so my kid could go hang out in Pittsburgh for four years instead of College Park. That’s just crazy to me. If living in Pittsburgh was that important to my kid, she can take the money she saved by going to Maryland and move to Pittsburgh after graduation.
I would. Pittsburgh is a much more interesting place for a young mind than College Park, a genetic campus in a bland suburb.
Anonymous wrote:Pitt and UMD are both good schools; I would consider them academic peers. I certainly wouldn’t pay extra just so my kid could go hang out in Pittsburgh for four years instead of College Park. That’s just crazy to me. If living in Pittsburgh was that important to my kid, she can take the money she saved by going to Maryland and move to Pittsburgh after graduation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pitt and UMD are both good schools; I would consider them academic peers. I certainly wouldn’t pay extra just so my kid could go hang out in Pittsburgh for four years instead of College Park. That’s just crazy to me. If living in Pittsburgh was that important to my kid, she can take the money she saved by going to Maryland and move to Pittsburgh after graduation.
I would. Pittsburgh is a much more interesting place for a young mind than College Park, a genetic campus in a bland suburb.
Sucker, as one person put it, sums you up nicely.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pitt and UMD are both good schools; I would consider them academic peers. I certainly wouldn’t pay extra just so my kid could go hang out in Pittsburgh for four years instead of College Park. That’s just crazy to me. If living in Pittsburgh was that important to my kid, she can take the money she saved by going to Maryland and move to Pittsburgh after graduation.
I would. Pittsburgh is a much more interesting place for a young mind than College Park, a genetic campus in a bland suburb.
Anonymous wrote:Pitt and UMD are both good schools; I would consider them academic peers. I certainly wouldn’t pay extra just so my kid could go hang out in Pittsburgh for four years instead of College Park. That’s just crazy to me. If living in Pittsburgh was that important to my kid, she can take the money she saved by going to Maryland and move to Pittsburgh after graduation.
Anonymous wrote:This conversation is very interesting to me! I am not originally from the US. In my country, students mostly live at home with parents and commute to school, with a much smaller fraction living in apartment shares near school. The concept of dorm life, the obsession with “finding yourself” in college, etc. are just not big considerations for students and their families. And yet, I’d say that in general, 18-22 year olds in my country problem solve with greater skill and are far more independent than their American counterparts, despite not “going away” to college.
I’m generally not a “get off my lawn!” type when it comes to American parenting, but I think posters here have it backwards. Instill the values of independence, diversity of thought/background/etc., when they are young. If they’ve already experienced those things throughout their lives, then the urgency of needing to go so far away to college (not to mention, the ungodly amount of money it takes to do so) won’t be such an issue. I see so many of my children’s friends and their families getting into debt or metaphorically killing themselves just for this purpose (and oftentimes to schools that aren’t even academically better than their in state options) and I just shake my head.