Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting document. I guess they determine if you have a cohort based on "receives enrichment/acceleration". the document says they are blinded to school and thus why CES students are affected more than non-CES.
This is beyond backwards. Is there any word on whether they have changed their admission process this year to make sure CES kids are not at a disadvantage?
CES kids aren't at a disadvantage. Because CES students received greater enrichment they should have higher map scores than kids who did not attend CES.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting document. I guess they determine if you have a cohort based on "receives enrichment/acceleration". the document says they are blinded to school and thus why CES students are affected more than non-CES.
This is beyond backwards. Is there any word on whether they have changed their admission process this year to make sure CES kids are not at a disadvantage?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I think if the original purpose of the magnet program is no longer applicable, then they should open up another magnet on the western side of the county, and not just because of academics but also for a shorter commute. And no, having one or two classes that have a similar magnet curriculum is not the same as a magnet program.
They did that already, in 2003.
http://www.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2003/200326/montgomery/news/164612-1.html
Which was 15 years ago. When MCPS had 23,000 fewer students than it does now.
They need one for the kids in Potomac, North Bethesda, Rockville etc.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting document. I guess they determine if you have a cohort based on "receives enrichment/acceleration". the document says they are blinded to school and thus why CES students are affected more than non-CES.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A friend pointed me to this document https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/schools/msmagnet/about/Middle%20school%20magnet%20selection%20process%20overview.PDF
Apparently one of the factors that is used for middle school magnet admissions is "whether the student receives enrichment/acceleration." (See the slide titled "Academic Performance.") She says based on this any student already in a CES will be at a disadvantage since that student is receiving enrichment/acceleration. Apparently last year the number of CES students admitted to the MS magnets went down drastically because of this, though the peer cohort (in the home middle school) criterion applied alone should affect both CES/non-CES students equally.
I am just wondering why MCPS looks at "whether the student receives enrichment/acceleration" as opposed to "whether the student NEEDS enrichment/acceleration." ? It sounds like because of this factor, students are better off not going to CES, if they want to improve their chances of qualifying for MS Magnets.
This is so messed up! Please tell me they have fixed this for this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I think if the original purpose of the magnet program is no longer applicable, then they should open up another magnet on the western side of the county, and not just because of academics but also for a shorter commute. And no, having one or two classes that have a similar magnet curriculum is not the same as a magnet program.
They did that already, in 2003.
http://www.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2003/200326/montgomery/news/164612-1.html
Which was 15 years ago. When MCPS had 23,000 fewer students than it does now.
They need one for the kids in Potomac, North Bethesda, Rockville etc.
Where is the MS magnet on the western side of the county that the ^^PP is referring to?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I think if the original purpose of the magnet program is no longer applicable, then they should open up another magnet on the western side of the county, and not just because of academics but also for a shorter commute. And no, having one or two classes that have a similar magnet curriculum is not the same as a magnet program.
They did that already, in 2003.
http://www.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2003/200326/montgomery/news/164612-1.html
Which was 15 years ago. When MCPS had 23,000 fewer students than it does now.
They need one for the kids in Potomac, North Bethesda, Rockville etc.
Anonymous wrote:A friend pointed me to this document https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/schools/msmagnet/about/Middle%20school%20magnet%20selection%20process%20overview.PDF
Apparently one of the factors that is used for middle school magnet admissions is "whether the student receives enrichment/acceleration." (See the slide titled "Academic Performance.") She says based on this any student already in a CES will be at a disadvantage since that student is receiving enrichment/acceleration. Apparently last year the number of CES students admitted to the MS magnets went down drastically because of this, though the peer cohort (in the home middle school) criterion applied alone should affect both CES/non-CES students equally.
I am just wondering why MCPS looks at "whether the student receives enrichment/acceleration" as opposed to "whether the student NEEDS enrichment/acceleration." ? It sounds like because of this factor, students are better off not going to CES, if they want to improve their chances of qualifying for MS Magnets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I think if the original purpose of the magnet program is no longer applicable, then they should open up another magnet on the western side of the county, and not just because of academics but also for a shorter commute. And no, having one or two classes that have a similar magnet curriculum is not the same as a magnet program.
They did that already, in 2003.
http://www.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2003/200326/montgomery/news/164612-1.html
Which was 15 years ago. When MCPS had 23,000 fewer students than it does now.
They need one for the kids in Potomac, North Bethesda, Rockville etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I think if the original purpose of the magnet program is no longer applicable, then they should open up another magnet on the western side of the county, and not just because of academics but also for a shorter commute. And no, having one or two classes that have a similar magnet curriculum is not the same as a magnet program.
They did that already, in 2003.
http://www.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2003/200326/montgomery/news/164612-1.html
Which was 15 years ago. When MCPS had 23,000 fewer students than it does now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I think if the original purpose of the magnet program is no longer applicable, then they should open up another magnet on the western side of the county, and not just because of academics but also for a shorter commute. And no, having one or two classes that have a similar magnet curriculum is not the same as a magnet program.
They did that already, in 2003.
http://www.gazette.net/gazette_archive/2003/200326/montgomery/news/164612-1.html