Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid's development will benefit for years to come because of having books in our home.
Team op.
Your kid didn’t need those books at minus 3 months, or even $200 in books a year later. OP needs to prioritize; yeah hormones, but at least recognize that you’re not thinking straight.
I'm very surprised that so many people here are opposed to having a lot of books for babies, toddlers and young kids. In fact, I don't actually believe that you people don't/didn't have books in your homes for your babies. If you truly believe it's best to not have books around, then you must be woefully uneducated. Are you?
I think op has just played you all: you're SO invested in being anti-op, that you've declared books are unimportant or unnecessary. Lol.
Anonymous wrote:My kid's development will benefit for years to come because of having books in our home.
Team op.
Your kid didn’t need those books at minus 3 months, or even $200 in books a year later. OP needs to prioritize; yeah hormones, but at least recognize that you’re not thinking straight.
My kid's development will benefit for years to come because of having books in our home.
Team op.
Anonymous wrote:I am not a fan of separate accounts. I think it makes it harder for the couple to keep track of the big financial picture and manage that. Add hormones and soon, a third member of the family, and suddenly you're arguing over $5 - why make it so hard for yourself?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, I just wanted to say that when my son was a baby, my dh and I got into an argument about books. It was the most bizarre thing for him to get pissy about. I can't even explain how perplexing it was to be that he would choose this to put his foot down about. I was being thrifty with everything, where's he was the one lobbying for the most expensive baby seat and crib mattress, yet he got all huffy about books. I told him that as ds gets older, the library will be a good option, but I wanted a nice collection for around the house. He eventually dropped the subject.
Op, just so you know for the future, my son is now 6. We get tons of books at garage sales and also new. But mostly from the library. I'm still glad we had lots of new books in our home when he was a baby and toddler.
You find it perplexing that your husband wanted to spend money on items direct.y related to your child’s health and safety, rather than on unessary luxuries like books?
This board never fails to surprise me.
Pp here. What are you even talking about? My husband wanted the most expensive baby seat (baby bouncer) and crib mattress. Top of the line baby bouncers and crib mattresses are unnecessary luxuries. You think that's more important than books, good for you. My kid's development will benefit for years to come because of having books in our home.
Team op.
.Anonymous wrote:Spending $200. on books for a child is crazy. Who does something like that? Better apologize, he’s right and your wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, I just wanted to say that when my son was a baby, my dh and I got into an argument about books. It was the most bizarre thing for him to get pissy about. I can't even explain how perplexing it was to be that he would choose this to put his foot down about. I was being thrifty with everything, where's he was the one lobbying for the most expensive baby seat and crib mattress, yet he got all huffy about books. I told him that as ds gets older, the library will be a good option, but I wanted a nice collection for around the house. He eventually dropped the subject.
Op, just so you know for the future, my son is now 6. We get tons of books at garage sales and also new. But mostly from the library. I'm still glad we had lots of new books in our home when he was a baby and toddler.
You find it perplexing that your husband wanted to spend money on items direct.y related to your child’s health and safety, rather than on unessary luxuries like books?
This board never fails to surprise me.