Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC’s kindergarten and 1st grade teachers both told us that the daily 20min of reading included parents reading to children. So if you already read with your kids nightly, logging it shouldn’t be a huge burden.
"Logging" as in scribbling down on a worksheet 1/week "we read 15 books this week" is fine.
If by "logging" they want you to write down title, author, and date -- that's nuts and I would not do it.
Why? It takes 5 whole minutes to fill out a log and it gives the teacher an idea as to what your kid is interested in.
Because it's meaningless busywork for me. And would be much more than 5 minutes to write down every book I read in a week. Mental load, don't need more of it!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Some kids in K are 4 years old. No, they don't need homework in K. I'm almost 60, and we didn't have regular homework until we were in third grade. That was a fine model. It's ludicrous to say that you have to start homework in K to get them ready for middle school. A 5 year old is not the same as an 11 year old.
We did reading time at bedtime in K, and counted that on the damn reading logs. The indecipherable math homework of "real math" math word problems I threw in the trash. None of us understood it.
When you get to high school, you realize all that K stuff was hooey.
This, people. This is why we're falling behind other countries in our math performance.
I'm not much of a math fan, but it's my Ivy-league educated husband who threw it in the trash. So there goes that theory.
+
= ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Growing up in Asia, I have to laugh at these kinds of posts. 20 minutes a day of homework is nothing. This is why the US consistently ranks so low compared to other industrialized nations.
Except that it's not. Research shows homework in the early years doesn't lead to academic improvement- so why do it?
I think the studies sometimes reflect what they want to find.
A kid who knows their shapes, numbers, letters and sounds before they go into K is going to start reading and doing math sooner. The more practice they have with math facts and word recognition the easier it will be for them to learn other concepts in school.
Learning is cumulative. If they start off with a weak foundation they are going to have a harder time than a kid who has had daily practice.
Ok, well, as long as we're just making things up: informal, relaxed family learning is superior to busy-work homework. It teaches the child skills in a natural setting, which is more intellectual enriching. It improves the bond with parents and household routines, which helps the child learn more responsibility down the line. The more school disrupts the family routine, the less enriching the family routine is. In addition, since the homework doesn't actually reflect substantive learning, it inculcates a resentment and lack of respect towards formal schooling that will reduce the child's ability to learn in school over time.
The "busy-work" is assigned for a reason. Usually it is meant to help kids get used to completing tasks with multi-step instructions. Ex: Color the stars blue, the circles red, the rectangles green and count how many stars, circles and rectangles there are on this page.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC’s kindergarten and 1st grade teachers both told us that the daily 20min of reading included parents reading to children. So if you already read with your kids nightly, logging it shouldn’t be a huge burden.
"Logging" as in scribbling down on a worksheet 1/week "we read 15 books this week" is fine.
If by "logging" they want you to write down title, author, and date -- that's nuts and I would not do it.
Why? It takes 5 whole minutes to fill out a log and it gives the teacher an idea as to what your kid is interested in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Some kids in K are 4 years old. No, they don't need homework in K. I'm almost 60, and we didn't have regular homework until we were in third grade. That was a fine model. It's ludicrous to say that you have to start homework in K to get them ready for middle school. A 5 year old is not the same as an 11 year old.
We did reading time at bedtime in K, and counted that on the damn reading logs. The indecipherable math homework of "real math" math word problems I threw in the trash. None of us understood it.
When you get to high school, you realize all that K stuff was hooey.
This, people. This is why we're falling behind other countries in our math performance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Growing up in Asia, I have to laugh at these kinds of posts. 20 minutes a day of homework is nothing. This is why the US consistently ranks so low compared to other industrialized nations.
Except that it's not. Research shows homework in the early years doesn't lead to academic improvement- so why do it?
I think the studies sometimes reflect what they want to find.
A kid who knows their shapes, numbers, letters and sounds before they go into K is going to start reading and doing math sooner. The more practice they have with math facts and word recognition the easier it will be for them to learn other concepts in school.
Learning is cumulative. If they start off with a weak foundation they are going to have a harder time than a kid who has had daily practice.
Ok, well, as long as we're just making things up: informal, relaxed family learning is superior to busy-work homework. It teaches the child skills in a natural setting, which is more intellectual enriching. It improves the bond with parents and household routines, which helps the child learn more responsibility down the line. The more school disrupts the family routine, the less enriching the family routine is. In addition, since the homework doesn't actually reflect substantive learning, it inculcates a resentment and lack of respect towards formal schooling that will reduce the child's ability to learn in school over time.
I don't know about the first part but the last sentence, definitely. This poor OP's kid is actually having major panic over homework. At age 5. That's most definitely going to leave a residual hatred for/anxiety about homework and school, I would think. As long as we're just speculating here, I vote for this.
Obviously if your kid is having meltdowns over doing the homework you don't do it. I would never force it.
Seems like this is sort of kicking the can down the road. Some kids are fairly easygoing, and don't fight doing a bit of HW. Other kids have major anxiety about it, and in general have a more anxious temperament. Wouldn't it be better to try to address the HW anxiety, rather than just avoid it? Otherwise, what happens if it's again an issue in 1st grade or 2nd grade?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Growing up in Asia, I have to laugh at these kinds of posts. 20 minutes a day of homework is nothing. This is why the US consistently ranks so low compared to other industrialized nations.
Except that it's not. Research shows homework in the early years doesn't lead to academic improvement- so why do it?
I think the studies sometimes reflect what they want to find.
A kid who knows their shapes, numbers, letters and sounds before they go into K is going to start reading and doing math sooner. The more practice they have with math facts and word recognition the easier it will be for them to learn other concepts in school.
Learning is cumulative. If they start off with a weak foundation they are going to have a harder time than a kid who has had daily practice.
Ok, well, as long as we're just making things up: informal, relaxed family learning is superior to busy-work homework. It teaches the child skills in a natural setting, which is more intellectual enriching. It improves the bond with parents and household routines, which helps the child learn more responsibility down the line. The more school disrupts the family routine, the less enriching the family routine is. In addition, since the homework doesn't actually reflect substantive learning, it inculcates a resentment and lack of respect towards formal schooling that will reduce the child's ability to learn in school over time.
I don't know about the first part but the last sentence, definitely. This poor OP's kid is actually having major panic over homework. At age 5. That's most definitely going to leave a residual hatred for/anxiety about homework and school, I would think. As long as we're just speculating here, I vote for this.
Obviously if your kid is having meltdowns over doing the homework you don't do it. I would never force it.
Seems like this is sort of kicking the can down the road. Some kids are fairly easygoing, and don't fight doing a bit of HW. Other kids have major anxiety about it, and in general have a more anxious temperament. Wouldn't it be better to try to address the HW anxiety, rather than just avoid it? Otherwise, what happens if it's again an issue in 1st grade or 2nd grade?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Growing up in Asia, I have to laugh at these kinds of posts. 20 minutes a day of homework is nothing. This is why the US consistently ranks so low compared to other industrialized nations.
Except that it's not. Research shows homework in the early years doesn't lead to academic improvement- so why do it?
I think the studies sometimes reflect what they want to find.
A kid who knows their shapes, numbers, letters and sounds before they go into K is going to start reading and doing math sooner. The more practice they have with math facts and word recognition the easier it will be for them to learn other concepts in school.
Learning is cumulative. If they start off with a weak foundation they are going to have a harder time than a kid who has had daily practice.
Ok, well, as long as we're just making things up: informal, relaxed family learning is superior to busy-work homework. It teaches the child skills in a natural setting, which is more intellectual enriching. It improves the bond with parents and household routines, which helps the child learn more responsibility down the line. The more school disrupts the family routine, the less enriching the family routine is. In addition, since the homework doesn't actually reflect substantive learning, it inculcates a resentment and lack of respect towards formal schooling that will reduce the child's ability to learn in school over time.
I don't know about the first part but the last sentence, definitely. This poor OP's kid is actually having major panic over homework. At age 5. That's most definitely going to leave a residual hatred for/anxiety about homework and school, I would think. As long as we're just speculating here, I vote for this.
Obviously if your kid is having meltdowns over doing the homework you don't do it. I would never force it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Growing up in Asia, I have to laugh at these kinds of posts. 20 minutes a day of homework is nothing. This is why the US consistently ranks so low compared to other industrialized nations.
Except that it's not. Research shows homework in the early years doesn't lead to academic improvement- so why do it?
I think the studies sometimes reflect what they want to find.
A kid who knows their shapes, numbers, letters and sounds before they go into K is going to start reading and doing math sooner. The more practice they have with math facts and word recognition the easier it will be for them to learn other concepts in school.
Learning is cumulative. If they start off with a weak foundation they are going to have a harder time than a kid who has had daily practice.
Ok, well, as long as we're just making things up: informal, relaxed family learning is superior to busy-work homework. It teaches the child skills in a natural setting, which is more intellectual enriching. It improves the bond with parents and household routines, which helps the child learn more responsibility down the line. The more school disrupts the family routine, the less enriching the family routine is. In addition, since the homework doesn't actually reflect substantive learning, it inculcates a resentment and lack of respect towards formal schooling that will reduce the child's ability to learn in school over time.
I don't know about the first part but the last sentence, definitely. This poor OP's kid is actually having major panic over homework. At age 5. That's most definitely going to leave a residual hatred for/anxiety about homework and school, I would think. As long as we're just speculating here, I vote for this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Growing up in Asia, I have to laugh at these kinds of posts. 20 minutes a day of homework is nothing. This is why the US consistently ranks so low compared to other industrialized nations.
Except that it's not. Research shows homework in the early years doesn't lead to academic improvement- so why do it?
I think the studies sometimes reflect what they want to find.
A kid who knows their shapes, numbers, letters and sounds before they go into K is going to start reading and doing math sooner. The more practice they have with math facts and word recognition the easier it will be for them to learn other concepts in school.
Learning is cumulative. If they start off with a weak foundation they are going to have a harder time than a kid who has had daily practice.
Ok, well, as long as we're just making things up: informal, relaxed family learning is superior to busy-work homework. It teaches the child skills in a natural setting, which is more intellectual enriching. It improves the bond with parents and household routines, which helps the child learn more responsibility down the line. The more school disrupts the family routine, the less enriching the family routine is. In addition, since the homework doesn't actually reflect substantive learning, it inculcates a resentment and lack of respect towards formal schooling that will reduce the child's ability to learn in school over time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Growing up in Asia, I have to laugh at these kinds of posts. 20 minutes a day of homework is nothing. This is why the US consistently ranks so low compared to other industrialized nations.
Except that it's not. Research shows homework in the early years doesn't lead to academic improvement- so why do it?
I think the studies sometimes reflect what they want to find.
A kid who knows their shapes, numbers, letters and sounds before they go into K is going to start reading and doing math sooner. The more practice they have with math facts and word recognition the easier it will be for them to learn other concepts in school.
Learning is cumulative. If they start off with a weak foundation they are going to have a harder time than a kid who has had daily practice.
Ok, well, as long as we're just making things up: informal, relaxed family learning is superior to busy-work homework. It teaches the child skills in a natural setting, which is more intellectual enriching. It improves the bond with parents and household routines, which helps the child learn more responsibility down the line. The more school disrupts the family routine, the less enriching the family routine is. In addition, since the homework doesn't actually reflect substantive learning, it inculcates a resentment and lack of respect towards formal schooling that will reduce the child's ability to learn in school over time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC’s kindergarten and 1st grade teachers both told us that the daily 20min of reading included parents reading to children. So if you already read with your kids nightly, logging it shouldn’t be a huge burden.
"Logging" as in scribbling down on a worksheet 1/week "we read 15 books this week" is fine.
If by "logging" they want you to write down title, author, and date -- that's nuts and I would not do it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Growing up in Asia, I have to laugh at these kinds of posts. 20 minutes a day of homework is nothing. This is why the US consistently ranks so low compared to other industrialized nations.
Except that it's not. Research shows homework in the early years doesn't lead to academic improvement- so why do it?
I think the studies sometimes reflect what they want to find.
A kid who knows their shapes, numbers, letters and sounds before they go into K is going to start reading and doing math sooner. The more practice they have with math facts and word recognition the easier it will be for them to learn other concepts in school.
Learning is cumulative. If they start off with a weak foundation they are going to have a harder time than a kid who has had daily practice.