Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody lives on campus through senior year.
Actually, at e.g. Denison, students live on campus (are required to live on campus) all four years.
I'm a parent of Denisonian and I like the way they have it structured - as you progress the residence halls change and the rooms become more apartment/townhouse like. I think its a win-win - well except for the fact that they cost more
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody lives on campus through senior year.
This is so not true in some colleges. I went to Columbia and no one wanted to live off campus.
Anonymous wrote:I loved living on campus at my SLAC, you can more easily participate in lots more activities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son attends Grinnell where the expectation is for students to live in college housing all four years. Obviously there are a few exceptions (the two kids he knows who are actually from Grinnell could live at home - both chose not to, married students, etc) but 4 years on campus was a big selling point IMO.
I don’t think faculty knock on the door but I know if you miss 2 classes in a row the professor will text/email/call to see what’s going on.
Plus being on campus - and the associated dining privileges mean students have access to food. Grinnell has students who depend on the school for food and thankfully they dont get kicked out of the dorms to make room for the first years.
The dorms provide a community and, especially for students who are poor, a safety net.
And again, too many people are being admitted to college: THIS is the problem. This helps nobody. If colleges like this stopped admitting almost everyone, they would be able to award need-based scholarships and grants for the economically disadvantaged students. But admitting everyone, and then forcing economically disadvantaged AND less academically capable kids to take out huge loans and scrape by miserably, helps nobody, including those kids.
If you actually bothered to understand what you are commenting about you would know that Grinnell is highly selective and 100% need blind. The economically disadvantaged students on campus are quite academically capable. Some schools do admit anyone - Grinnell would not be in that category.
Anonymous wrote:Purdue actually studied student success in making the decision to expand on-campus housing. Living on campus has a statistically significant increase in year over year retention and GPA.
https://www.purdue.edu/purduemoves/initiatives/education/living-learning.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody lives on campus through senior year.
This is so not true in some colleges. I went to Columbia and no one wanted to live off campus.
How long ago were you there? Currently at Columbia just 32% of undergraduates live on campus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody lives on campus through senior year.
This is so not true in some colleges. I went to Columbia and no one wanted to live off campus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son attends Grinnell where the expectation is for students to live in college housing all four years. Obviously there are a few exceptions (the two kids he knows who are actually from Grinnell could live at home - both chose not to, married students, etc) but 4 years on campus was a big selling point IMO.
I don’t think faculty knock on the door but I know if you miss 2 classes in a row the professor will text/email/call to see what’s going on.
Plus being on campus - and the associated dining privileges mean students have access to food. Grinnell has students who depend on the school for food and thankfully they dont get kicked out of the dorms to make room for the first years.
The dorms provide a community and, especially for students who are poor, a safety net.
And again, too many people are being admitted to college: THIS is the problem. This helps nobody. If colleges like this stopped admitting almost everyone, they would be able to award need-based scholarships and grants for the economically disadvantaged students. But admitting everyone, and then forcing economically disadvantaged AND less academically capable kids to take out huge loans and scrape by miserably, helps nobody, including those kids.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody lives on campus through senior year.