Anonymous wrote:Why the uptick of homeless in SF?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh great, a friend and I are going next week for 5 days (just two women.) I really hope this is exagerrated.
I do know two older (early 60s) family members who just went in April and their only comment was that there were a lot of homeless people.... which SF is well known for. These are Fox News watching 60 year olds, so I hope that's an accurate representation of what they saw. They stayed in Union Square, which is also where we are staying.
Tons of homeless people in union square. I was targeted by homeless youth the last time I was there, and I was nearly mugged. A local saw then casing me, approached me and scared them off. I had noticed them as well and sensed something was off, so I was grateful to the local who stepped in. He said it happens a lot.
Where are you from? Have you ever interacted with any homeless people before? I'm the person going with a friend next week, and I have lived in Baltimore and my friend lives in DC. We both have had "encounters" with homeless before... so this is not unfamiliar for us. Just curious if this was something you'd never dealt with before, which is why it sticks out so much to you, or if it truly was a unique situation.
Obviously you have not seen or experienced California homelessness.
No I have not, hence the questions? Seems obvious to me. I have been to southern California (LA and San Diego) and never noticed any homeless/any difference from what you see everywhere.
Ok so first, it was all CA homeless. Now it's just SF homeless. And I've asked repeatedly what the difference is, and just keep getting "SF homeless are unlike any other." OKAY BUT HOW?
There is a huge difference between SoCal homeless and San Fran homeless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh great, a friend and I are going next week for 5 days (just two women.) I really hope this is exagerrated.
I do know two older (early 60s) family members who just went in April and their only comment was that there were a lot of homeless people.... which SF is well known for. These are Fox News watching 60 year olds, so I hope that's an accurate representation of what they saw. They stayed in Union Square, which is also where we are staying.
Tons of homeless people in union square. I was targeted by homeless youth the last time I was there, and I was nearly mugged. A local saw then casing me, approached me and scared them off. I had noticed them as well and sensed something was off, so I was grateful to the local who stepped in. He said it happens a lot.
Where are you from? Have you ever interacted with any homeless people before? I'm the person going with a friend next week, and I have lived in Baltimore and my friend lives in DC. We both have had "encounters" with homeless before... so this is not unfamiliar for us. Just curious if this was something you'd never dealt with before, which is why it sticks out so much to you, or if it truly was a unique situation.
Obviously you have not seen or experienced California homelessness.
No I have not, hence the questions? Seems obvious to me. I have been to southern California (LA and San Diego) and never noticed any homeless/any difference from what you see everywhere.
Ok so first, it was all CA homeless. Now it's just SF homeless. And I've asked repeatedly what the difference is, and just keep getting "SF homeless are unlike any other." OKAY BUT HOW?
There is a huge difference between SoCal homeless and San Fran homeless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hilarious. Please all you pearl clutchers stay away. SF is not interested in your business anyhow.
I know, right? They can stick to their vacations in the Hamptons and leave the fun places to the rest of us.
Anonymous wrote:I have walked around for blocks in both DC and NYC, and not once have I ever encountered one pile of human waste, let along 300 piles of human waste
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hilarious. Please all you pearl clutchers stay away. SF is not interested in your business anyhow.
I know, right? They can stick to their vacations in the Hamptons and leave the fun places to the rest of us.
Many of loved San Francisco.
Poop, needles and aggressive junkie homeless have ruined the city
Why are you so offensive about the idea of this? Do you like living in filth?
They consider it "culture" and "adventurous"![]()
Yes.
Nothing says adventure than feces and a raging case of hepititus.
You mean hepatitis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hilarious. Please all you pearl clutchers stay away. SF is not interested in your business anyhow.
I know, right? They can stick to their vacations in the Hamptons and leave the fun places to the rest of us.
Many of loved San Francisco.
Poop, needles and aggressive junkie homeless have ruined the city
Why are you so offensive about the idea of this? Do you like living in filth?
They consider it "culture" and "adventurous"![]()
Yes.
Nothing says adventure than feces and a raging case of hepititus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hilarious. Please all you pearl clutchers stay away. SF is not interested in your business anyhow.
I know, right? They can stick to their vacations in the Hamptons and leave the fun places to the rest of us.
Many of loved San Francisco.
Poop, needles and aggressive junkie homeless have ruined the city
Why are you so offensive about the idea of this? Do you like living in filth?
They consider it "culture" and "adventurous"![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hilarious. Please all you pearl clutchers stay away. SF is not interested in your business anyhow.
I know, right? They can stick to their vacations in the Hamptons and leave the fun places to the rest of us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hilarious. Please all you pearl clutchers stay away. SF is not interested in your business anyhow.
I know, right? They can stick to their vacations in the Hamptons and leave the fun places to the rest of us.
Many of loved San Francisco.
Poop, needles and aggressive junkie homeless have ruined the city
Why are you so offensive about the idea of this? Do you like living in filth?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hilarious. Please all you pearl clutchers stay away. SF is not interested in your business anyhow.
I know, right? They can stick to their vacations in the Hamptons and leave the fun places to the rest of us.
Anonymous wrote:This is hilarious. Please all you pearl clutchers stay away. SF is not interested in your business anyhow.