Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t like her, OP. We get it.
It may not be about not liking her but the child doesn't live there and is a visitor. Child is there to spend time with Dad, not babysit and depending on her mother, OP may get an earful. I didn't let my husband's kids babysit. They are there to spend time with Dad, not be our child care. Same for friends teenage kids who visit now. Those kids offer but they are there to spend time with all of us, not be babysitters.
It's her brother. Siblings are expected to babysit once in awhile and it's good for them to bond 1 on 1. It wasn't even the whole day. Part of the problem is that OP is treating the step DD as if she is a guest/stranger and not family - and I get your point about the DD being a visitor, but it's still her brother and her dad. OP really changed her tone after her initial post - this is about her not liking the step DD and her own control issues with how she wants "HER" family to operate.
Would she flip out if it was her own daughter babysitting her younger brother? Or is it that much different because the hypothetical bio DD would live there?
Anonymous wrote:A 4yo is not a toddler.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t like her, OP. We get it.
It may not be about not liking her but the child doesn't live there and is a visitor. Child is there to spend time with Dad, not babysit and depending on her mother, OP may get an earful. I didn't let my husband's kids babysit. They are there to spend time with Dad, not be our child care. Same for friends teenage kids who visit now. Those kids offer but they are there to spend time with all of us, not be babysitters.
A child shouldn't be made to feel like a visitor in their family home, even if they also have another family home. When there's a non-routine situation, like a preschooler home sick with a mild illness, then it's totally reasonable to expect a teenager to step up while their parent runs and errand and picks up another sibling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it. He didn't discuss with you first and you're freaking out about what else will he not partner with you on in the future. I understand why you'd feel panic-y. I would, too. I would try not to be reactive, given nothing bad happened, then try to strategize to get the outcome you want. Work in your self-interest. I don't mean to be manipulative about it, but in a way, it's what you're doing to get your needs met.
If it were me, my strategy would be to say, "Hey baby, thanks for running all of those errands. I wouldn't have made the same choice to let Larla babysit, given she's in a cast and Larlo is sick, but I understand you need the help and you did the best you can. Thanks for taking the reigns on this because I was really busy. Let's talk first next time so we're both comfy with the babysitting set up, and let's talk about paying Larla next time when she babysits, too, so she can pocket a little cash. Love you!"
This is why men have affairs.
Anonymous wrote:I think the bigger issue is why you feel you have to “approve” his decisions for one kid equally his and one all his. This “men have to be managed” crap spewed above is sick.[/quote]
Look at all the posts about all the shit women have to deal with in their marriage. It's because men are clueless. I'm really happy you found one that doesn't need to be managed. If he's got a big d*ck, then bonus!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t like her, OP. We get it.
It may not be about not liking her but the child doesn't live there and is a visitor. Child is there to spend time with Dad, not babysit and depending on her mother, OP may get an earful. I didn't let my husband's kids babysit. They are there to spend time with Dad, not be our child care. Same for friends teenage kids who visit now. Those kids offer but they are there to spend time with all of us, not be babysitters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t like her, OP. We get it.
It may not be about not liking her but the child doesn't live there and is a visitor. Child is there to spend time with Dad, not babysit and depending on her mother, OP may get an earful. I didn't let my husband's kids babysit. They are there to spend time with Dad, not be our child care. Same for friends teenage kids who visit now. Those kids offer but they are there to spend time with all of us, not be babysitters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t like her, OP. We get it.
It may not be about not liking her but the child doesn't live there and is a visitor. Child is there to spend time with Dad, not babysit and depending on her mother, OP may get an earful. I didn't let my husband's kids babysit. They are there to spend time with Dad, not be our child care. Same for friends teenage kids who visit now. Those kids offer but they are there to spend time with all of us, not be babysitters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it. He didn't discuss with you first and you're freaking out about what else will he not partner with you on in the future. I understand why you'd feel panic-y. I would, too. I would try not to be reactive, given nothing bad happened, then try to strategize to get the outcome you want. Work in your self-interest. I don't mean to be manipulative about it, but in a way, it's what you're doing to get your needs met.
If it were me, my strategy would be to say, "Hey baby, thanks for running all of those errands. I wouldn't have made the same choice to let Larla babysit, given she's in a cast and Larlo is sick, but I understand you need the help and you did the best you can. Thanks for taking the reigns on this because I was really busy. Let's talk first next time so we're both comfy with the babysitting set up, and let's talk about paying Larla next time when she babysits, too, so she can pocket a little cash. Love you!"
Please tell me you don't actually condescend to your husband like this. What. The. F*ck.
If my dh was stupid enough not to consult me before making that decision, then f**k yeah, I would. And he'd be too stupid to know I was doing it. But, I wouldn't care, because I'd get my way, and he'd be happy that I didn't nag him.
Anonymous wrote:You don’t like her, OP. We get it.